We’re going to have to face a painful fact: Mitch McConnell and the Senate Republicans are just not that bright.

The body of the late Justice Antonin Scalia was barely cold before McConnell and his lackeys rushed to warn everybody not to politicize this solemn moment, about three seconds before they began politicizing it for all they were worth.

McConnell, Toddler-Terrifying Ted Cruz and Young Marco Robotto — sorry, I mean Rubio — declared that there’s an 80-year-old “rule” against a president nominating a Supreme Court Justice in the last year of his term.

They had discovered this rule by the research method known as “making stuff up.”

Turns out, this situation where one of the Supremes shuffles off this mortal coil in the last year of a presidency just doesn’t happen all that often, certainly not often enough that one could glean so much as a guideline, let alone a rule, from history.

The Constitution — which the wingnuts claim to revere but apparently know jack-squat about — is very clear that the president “shall” nominate, among various other officers, “Justices of the Supreme Court” and appoint them “with the advice and consent of the Senate.”

So we have the spectacle of the president doing his constitutional duty, and the Senate saying, “We won’t advise, we won’t consent. Heck, we won’t even meet the nominee.” Having demonstrated their own uselessness as a Senate, they now appear to be dead-set on rendering another of the three branches of government as paralyzed as they are.

Where the “three no’s” (no meetings, no hearings, no vote) that McConnell et al. have promised to stick to are found in the Constitution has never been explained. Like the supposed “80-year rule” against nominating in an election year, this appears to be pure applesauce, as the late Justice Scalia was fond of saying.

Not only is this behavior by the Republicans against both the letter and the spirit of the Constitution, but it’s also foolish. If the Republicans hold the line on their promise to delay even a hearing till after the election, they’ll keep this issue open until Election Day.

They’ll give whoever the Democratic nominee is a perfect example of the kind of mulish obstructionism that people are so heartily and vocally sick of.

They are handing even a half-smart candidate a club the size of a California Redwood to thrash them with on a daily basis, and both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are not half-smart — they are both very, very smart.

The current course of action by the Senate Republicans seems perfectly calculated to lose not only the presidency but the Senate. When that happens, folks, stuff’s gonna get real, as the kids say.

Or consider this alternative scenario: A few Senate Republicans actually do their jobs, defy the leadership, and give the candidate nominated by the president a hearing.

Centrists and independents say, “Hey, maybe these guys are reasonable after all,” but the wingnuts scream, “OMG! We are betrayed again by the evil party establishment!” and tear the party to shreds before handing the raggedy, bloodstained banner of the presidential nomination to “outsider” Donald Trump.

Democrats win the presidency and the Senate, and get to replace not only Scalia, but Ginsburg, Kennedy and probably Breyer as well.

Majority Leader McConnell is leading his party into the political equivalent of the Valley of the Little Big Horn. He and his supporters in the Senate should turn their horses around and get the heck back to the high ground.

They should face the reality that President Barack Obama was indeed elected to that job, by large margins, and he’s going to do the job till the last day in office.

But they should also demand the sort of bland centrist that Obama will almost certainly give them to avoid a fight, then run for the rest of the year on who gets the next three appointments.

They've really not thought this through, which I suppose is no surprise to anyone. I hate to say it, but they’re just not that smart.

OK, that’s a lie. I love to say it.

Dusty Rhoades lives, writes and practices law in Carthage. His new novel, “Ice Chest,” is available now.

(8) comments

Mark Hayes

There is reasoning behind this columnist not offering a rebuttal to his critics here, he would have to offer examples offering support to his accusations, something that would make appear even more bazar. Unlike Robert Levy and others who do often reply, this columnist has shown in the past his odd and sometime erratic behavior when confronted. It is meaningless to offer opinions when no call for validating them is required, his columns are just a continuing condescending rants that contain very little intellectual content and display the need one has for recognition, in the end, it is all about him.

jerry hart

Trusty the Rusty Dusty fails to mention that Joe Biden did the exact same thing back in the 1990's when George Senior was in office.

Why is it that Mrs Rhodes fails to ever mention both sides of the issue?

Mark Hayes

Obama has already mentioned a replacement, Robert L. Wilkins, why am I not surprised.

Isaac Levi Cohen

Aaaaah, Mr. Rhoades,
and his usual LWNJ clap-trap ,, filled with the usual sophomoric talking points,
name calling, and standard left-wing hate speech.

So predictable

Peyton Cook

Check the efforts of Democrats to deny consideration of Republican presidents Judicial nominees. The Senate Judiciary Committee should consider any that Obama nominates. If none pass the test of strict adherence to the US Constitution, they should be voted down. Of course, Obama is going to attempt to find a judge just conservative enough to pick off RINO Republican Senators.

Scott Bowers

Mr. SeniorLee, thank you for your input. Actually, I’ve been leaning more toward unaffiliated. My understanding is that in North Carolina that would allow me to vote in whichever party’s primary I choose. I need to do a bit more research first, but I’ve heard there’s been a lot of North Carolinians switching to unaffiliated. On the other hand, I may very well just stay right where I am. Things may just work themselves out in the not-too-distant future. I would like to ask one thing though. Is it really wise to alienate so many groups of voters? Young voters, minority voters, and even centrist Republicans like myself (I can’t believe I’m alone in this considering the rising number of unaffiliated voters in the state) are having a hard time buying what the Republicans are currently selling. And, when anyone offers an opinion that differs from the Republican Shibboleth their opinion is more often than not met with insult. I’ve been very proud to be a Republican for most of the past 35 years or so, but not so much lately I’m sad to say.

Dwight Kidd

Mr. ScottB, I think the Democrat party would welcome you. Goodby.

Scott Bowers

Mr. Rhoades, as a Republican I really cannot disagree. It’s been painful to watch. From the party’s decision to become obstructionist immediately after President Obama was elected, to how they decided to become a kinder, gentler, more inclusive party after Mr. Romney lost (that really went well…), to the current primary season, to jumping the gun over Justice Scalia’s death, it reminds me of a never ending Three Stooges movie, just with a bunch more stooges.

The only thing I would add to what you’ve said concerning the Supreme Court vacancy; more than one Supreme Court Justice has been appointed by a president during the Senate recess. If the Senate does not act, the President could elect to fill the position unilaterally, albeit temporarily. If nothing else, that would fill the position in the meantime and force the Senate to act sometime during their next session.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

The Pilot

Get unlimited digital access and support award-winning local journalism, for just $5 a month. This includes access to the electronic replica edition of The Pilot.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Already have a Print Subscription? Get Digital Access Free.

The Pilot

As a print subscriber, you also have unlimited digital access. Connect your account now. Or, call customer service at 910-693-2487 for help.


Our system has been updated, if you are a current print subscriber and cannot obtain your unlimited access, please contact customer support 910-693-2490. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Home Delivery

The Pilot

Our best deal: Get all the news of Moore County delivered to your home each Wednesday and Sunday — and receive unlimited digital access to thepilot.com.

Starting at
$27.82 for 90 days