Moore County’s annual budgeting method has always been a little unstructured when it comes to its public schools. For years, the Board of Commissioners and Board of Education would look at the current budget; estimate new costs and needs vs. impact on taxes and the county’s overall budget; and then come up with an allotment to go with state and federal dollars.

In 2016, commissioners attempted to apply some budgeting consistency. Since education spending regularly was about 40 percent of the county’s overall revenue, it decided to tell the school district to plan on that percentage amount year-to-year. The district’s budget would rise in years when the county had more revenue and contract accordingly in bad times.

That lasted four years. Commissioners last year scrapped it after realizing that it wasn’t really being adhered to by either board.

But now a new plan for school funding has emerged, and while the details have yet to be outlined, the concept has real merit.

A Massive Change

New school board member David Hensley last week proposed the county mimic the state in setting up a per-pupil funding method for Moore County Schools. Funding would fluctuate each year based on state per-student funding and enrollment.

In addition, such a formula would also supply the district with additional local funding to cover cost increases driven — but not funded — by the state. That alone would be a massive change, for the school board is forever bemoaning having to cover the cost of new requirements imposed — but not paid for — by the state.

But wait, there’s more. Hensley’s proposal could address a long-standing thorn in the district’s side: charter school funding. Charters receive per-pupil funding from the state and the county in which that child lives. The district passes that money along to the charters.

In theory, money follows the child, so a student who was in the school district but transfers to a charter “takes” their funding with them. But there are charter school students who have never attended a district school. The commissioners do not allocate money specific to those students. Instead, the district, essentially, has to cover those students from other students’ per-pupil funding.

Hensley’s formula would have commissioners provide real funding for those students, as well as accounting for enrollment increases at those schools.

‘Very Healthy’

We can only imagine Schools Superintendent Bob Grimesey’s heart bursting with joy at hearing this proposal come from a staunch conservative Republican, but he remained in character.

“Currently there is no funding formula, which leaves us with just a process by which we try to build school board consensus on what the needs are, and what the cost of those needs are and to run that up against what the county projects as its revenues absent a tax increase,” he said. “It would be the superintendent’s desire that the board work with the county commissioners to come up with a funding formula. I think a funding formula, regardless of the metrics of it, would be very healthy for our community and our school district.”

We can also imagine what the heart of County Manager Wayne Vest must be doing about now. Someone should check on him.

Vest and the commissioners have done their level best to keep education spending in check over the years. It’s not like asking for more money hasn’t been tried before. God bless David Hensley if he thinks he’s got a new trick for this old dog.

“There’s not a soul in this county who doesn’t want to get our schools up to speed. I believe the county commissioners will share that view,” he said. “They just need a proposal that they can get behind that doesn’t include tax increases or a big bond issue that needs to be voted for.”

So while God is in the details, so is the devil. Let’s see more on this idea to figure out which.

(3) comments

jimmie canabera

IF you are concerned about education in Moore County be sure to read an unbelievable article in Sandhills Sentinel "Low-performing schools given permission to relax regulations in hopes of increasing student performance."

Peyton Cook

Good for Mr. Hensley! His formula for student-based funding is right on.

Barbara Misiaszek

It's a good idea if he can get the County Commissioner's to agree to it and then live with it.

John Misiaszek

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

The Pilot

Get unlimited digital access and support award-winning local journalism, for just $5 a month. This includes access to the electronic replica edition of The Pilot.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Already have a Print Subscription? Get Digital Access Free.

The Pilot

As a print subscriber, you also have unlimited digital access. Connect your account now. Or, call customer service at 910-693-2487 for help.

 

Our system has been updated, if you are a current print subscriber and cannot obtain your unlimited access, please contact customer support 910-693-2490. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Home Delivery

The Pilot

Our best deal: Get all the news of Moore County delivered to your home each Wednesday and Sunday — and receive unlimited digital access to thepilot.com.

Starting at
$27.82 for 90 days