On Jan. 3, we woke to news that a U.S. drone strike had killed Iranian Gen. Qassim Suleimani.

He commanded Iran’s most elite military unit, the Revolutionary Guards Quds Force, and was in charge of virtually all Iran-sponsored foreign military terrorist operations, particularly in Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and Iraq.

Retired U.S. Gen. David Petraeus, who commanded American forces during the war in Iraq, once called Suleimani “our most significant and evil adversary in the greater Middle East.”

The United States has been engaged in a world war on terrorism since Sept. 11, 2001. Gen. Suleimani was the most senior terrorist leader in the world and therefore a valid target.

One’s initial reaction to the news of his death might simply be, “Oh my, now there will be a revenge attack on the U.S. mainland and/or against military or civilians stationed overseas.”

While that may be true, a simple knee-jerk reaction hardly explains the larger issue and justification for taking him out at this point in time.

To put the Suleimani incident in perspective, it may be helpful to go back in time and review Middle East policy in general, and Iran in particular since 9/11.

President Bush’s policy/strategy in the Middle East post-9/11: After building a justification for invading Iraq and Afghanistan, the Bush administration’s strategy evolved into one of nation building. That is, if we could successfully establish two valid and enduring democracies, Iraq to a greater extent and Afghanistan to a lesser extent, they could be the catalyst to transform the Middle East.

Unfortunately, we discovered — after spending trillions of dollars and many American lives — that the Middle East is not up to the task. It is so deeply entrenched in authoritarian rule that its people cannot conceive the concept of freedom as we know it.

On Sept. 27, 2013, President Obama called Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, marking the highest-level contact between the U.S. and Iran since 1979. What evolved from that was a strategy toward Iran of, for lack of a better word, appeasement. It was essentially a reset of U.S. policy in the Middle East. It was also blind to the Iranian goal of dominance in the Middle East.

What followed was two years of hard work by Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry at the negotiating table with Iran. The Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, was sealed in July 2015. Part of the deal was to offer Tehran billions of dollars in sanctions relief in exchange for agreeing to curb its nuclear program. The agreement was aimed at ensuring that “Iran’s nuclear program will be exclusively peaceful.”

Meanwhile, throughout the two years of negotiations, on any given Friday, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could be viewed repeating his weekly message, “death to Americana and destruction of Israel.”

During negotiations, Obama/Biden/Kerry gave observers the impression that they would do anything to consummate the agreement. When completed, many believed it was not worth the paper it was written on and, in fact, it gave Iran the green light to continue its drive toward Middle East domination and development of nuclear weapons and long-range delivery missiles.

In May 2018, President Trump pulled out of the nuclear agreement with Iran and since has strangled them with economic sanctions. Interestingly, since the pullout, Iran admitted to advances in its nuclear weapon development.

The Trump foreign policy/Middle East strategy can be summed up as follows: “America First.” We will rebuild our economy and our military while imposing harshest possible economic sanctions against those who wish to do us harm.

On New Year’s Eve, an Iranian-backed terrorist organization in Iraq attacked the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. Dozens of terrorists breaching the compound did so in support of Kataeb Hezbollah, which the State Department has designated as a foreign terrorist organization.

Gen. Suleimani had led Iran foreign policy toward the U.S. through an 18-month lead-up to the U.S. Embassy attack. He flew into Baghdad to become personally involved with the Kataeb Hezbollah terrorist operations, thereby presenting himself as a perfect target of opportunity.

The Trump doctrine does not seek a land war with Iran. But three loud and clear messages have been sent to the Iranian leadership. One, when we identify a “red line” we do not cross it. The second is an implied message that the next air strike could take out your entire oil refining capability, which is your last and only source of revenue. Finally, the take-down of Suleimani says it all: We know where you are, and you might be next.

Marvin L. Covault is a retired U.S. Army lieutenant general.

(10) comments

Peyton Cook

I wholeheartedly agree with General Covault. Iran has been at war with the United States since November of 1979 when it seized the US Embassy in Tehran and held American citizens for over a year. It is the leading supporter of terrorist organizations since then. General Soliemani has orchestrated deadly attacks on American soldiers using IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices). There was a UN travel ban on Soliemani. There is ample evidence of provocative attacks against the US in the region: shooting done a US drone, seizing an American naval vessel and abusing the crew. The US has not responded in kind. Soliemani deserved what he got.

ken leary

When I awoke on Jan 3 I learned that some snake in the grass murdered an Iranian patriot who was trying to facilitate healing in a country devastated by the United States interminable imperialist efforts to maintain its hegemony. Let’s face it general, we, the USA, in 1953, through the CIA and the criminal Dulles brothers, overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran because that government wanted to free itself from foreign economic control of its resources. We put in power a man who murdered his country men for the purpose of pleasing his American masters. People like you general, people without integrity, mislead people. Anyone who defies the USA’s dominance is a terrorist (it used to be communist) and our method of response is always to stir up some unrest, pay off a bunch of fascist dictator types to effect regime change, and then turn a blind eye on the terror we unleash. Since 2001 we have spent 6 plus trillion dollars on the fiasco in the Near East according the Cost of War study done by Brown University. Hundreds of thousands of people have been murdered or displaced as a result of what is now known to have been manufactured evidence, ie., lies. Just like the bs you spout in this column. I pity any man or woman who would follow someone like you into battle, and I pity any man or woman who sacrifices their future in a futile effort to enable the real terrorists in this world (Bush, Cheney, Trump, Pompeo, Wolfowitz, Nixon, Obama, Kissinger, Clinton, Rumsfeld, etc.) to wallow in their pyrrhic victories.

Jim Tomashoff

"...an Iranian patriot who was trying to facilitate healing in a country..." You're as warped on the Left as Kent, Peyton, et.al. are on the Right.

Dan Roman

He does have a point about the invasion of Iraq

Ed Pieczynski

Copy that.

ken leary

Typical liberal reply.

ken leary

Actually Jim, it's not just liberal silliness. Your's is the effort of a person who has no rational argument to offer in response to something they disagree with, a cliché. Call the opponent "warped" or crazy. Tell me Jim, why will the USA not leave a sovereign country when told to go? What right do you allocate to your belief system that allows you to do whatever you want, wherever you want, whenever you want, to anyone you want to do it to? That's the way you and your neocon liberal democrat cohorts roll. Whose nuts? Or as I say, just plain evil.

Peyton Cook

The previous President pulled out of Iraq in 2011 and ISIS stepped in. When we sent a new contingent of the military back to Iraq, its mission was to train the Iraq security forces. We would not engage in combat except in a defense posture and protection of the American Embassy. The resolution by the Iraq Parliament is non binding and have of the members were absent.

Mark Hayes

By following comments being made here, Ken I believe the only Presidential candidate that can deliver on matters you seem so deeply concerned, that would be Bernie Sanders .

Peyton Cook

Yes, Soliemani was an Iranian patriotic but a deadly one. He his responsible for the death of over 600 Americans because of road side bombs. You really have a bad case of TDS.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for Reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

Thank you for visiting ThePilot.com and supporting award-winning community journalism. Not everyone wants to have a newspaper delivered to their home, but they want to keep up with the latest news in Moore County. Click here to gain digital-only access and support local journalism.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Connect Print Subscription to Digital Access

Thank you for visiting ThePilot.com. Your Pilot subscription entitles you to unlimited digital access. Simply log in. From the home page, click on Subscription Services. Then click on "Pilot All Access Print Subscribers." It should show your phone number . If so, click "Sign Up." After a few seconds, it will take you back to the home page. Log out, then log back in. You're set! For any problems, call our customer service number at 910-693-2487 or 693-2488.

Free access for current print subscribers