Two mega-firms — the third- and fourth-largest cellular communications companies— want to merge. Is it a good idea? Is it permissible?

In a free market economy, private companies own the means of production and control their use through voluntary decisions made in the marketplace. The government plays a small role, ideally serving as an economic promoter and preventer of abuses.

Two forces make the free market system work: self-interest and competition. Self-interest is a given. We are all motivated by the betterment of our lives. Self- interest is the primary motivator of economic activity. We go to school so we can get a better job someday and earn more money to buy the things we want. In fact, most of the economic activity we see around us is the result of self-interested behavior.

Adam Smith described this foundational drive in his epic book, “The Wealth of Nations”: “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.” Self-interest in generating revenue is not greedy; it is not evil; it is a truism is existence.

The role of competition is somewhat different. It is external to self-interest, but it was described by Smith over 200 years ago as foundational to the benefits of a free market economy. Unconstrained self-interest can easily and naturally lead to price gouging, corruption and cheating, but in a competitive market, it is held in check by the natural forces of competition. A producer must provide a high-quality good or service at a reasonable price.

But this assumes the producer has competitors keeping an eye on him. If there is no competition, the producer can charge a high price, sell inferior products, or ill-treat customers. Thus, competition is the regulator, a check on self-interest, because it restrains one’s ability to take advantage of the market. Such is the natural and magical “invisible hand” described by Adam Smith.

The discussion of self-interest and competition usually results in a discussion of the proper role of government regulation. Some see a market economy as largely self-regulating, assuming there are enough firms competing in the market to be a check on self-interest. Others point to examples of fraud where competition has failed to be an adequate check on self-interest; they argue that government must take a more active role in promoting competition in economic activity.

This conviction was the motivating force of Republican Sen. John Sherman of Ohio in sponsoring federal legislation to broadly outlaw combinations in restraint of trade, an act now called the Sherman Act. It was later augmented by a more specific law called the Clayton Act.

Attorneys general from 10 states have filed a lawsuit under principles enunciated in the Sherman and Clayton acts, seeking to block the merger of the cellphone mega- companies T-Mobile and Sprint. These third- and fourth-largest U.S. wireless phone service providers have been pursuing a deal to combine since April 2018. The deal has been under extensive federal regulatory review ever since, with approval required both from the Federal Communications Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice.

Sprint and T-Mobile believe that joining forces would give them the scale to better compete with industry leaders AT&T and Verizon. Critics of the merger argue that shrinking the field from four major players to three would reduce competitive intensity and lead to higher prices for consumers.

The deal secured the backing of the head of the Federal Communications Commission chairman last month. But the path to consummation is still in question. The Department of Justice antitrust division staff members reportedly recommended opposing the merger, and the state AG lawsuit is just beginning. The state AG complaint, filed in a federal court in New York, argues that the merger would cause consumer harm by making it easier for the carriers to collude in raising prices. They project a combined cost to Sprint and T-Mobile subscribers of over $4.5 billion a year.

Notwithstanding that the basic anti-trust laws were initiated by trust-busting President Teddy Roosevelt and championed by Sen. John Sherman, recent Republican administrations have not been exuberant in enforcing the anti-trust laws. George W. Bush advised The Economist prior to taking office that his administration would be laissez-faire on anti-trust and would prosecute only direct price fixing.

Anti-trust enforcement under Donald Trump has fallen to its slowest rate since the 1970s, according to figures compiled by the Financial Times. Fewer than 20 new cases were publicly filed by the Department of Justice in the most recent fiscal year, a level last seen in 1972, almost five decades ago.

So far, the White House has been silent on the Sprint-T Mobile merger.

Don Tortorice is a former attorney and professor at the Law School of the College of William and Mary.

(1) comment

ken leary

In 2008 financial terrorists concocted a number of financial products. No "invisible hand" informed them that these products would devastate the world's economies. The only thing that informed them was greed. The way to this event was paved by eliminating Glass/Steagal and any number of other policy changes the army of lobbyists paid the politicians to adjust in their favor. Maybe the invisible hand is actually presenting a universally understood gesture of contempt towards people who will not take responsibility for their own "welfare." 60 fortune 500 companies paid no taxes in 2018. They got 40+ billion dollars in government subsidies. That 40 billion is someones tax money paid to firms who's profits are in the billions. My point, I guess, is that if these "leaders" are not stopped, no divine invisible hand is going to interfere with the consolidation of wealth into fewer and fewer "hands." Of course it will make it easier to nationalize these enterprises when the time comes.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for Reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

Thank you for visiting and supporting award-winning community journalism. Not everyone wants to have a newspaper delivered to their home, but they want to keep up with the latest news in Moore County. Click here to gain digital-only access and support local journalism.

Starting at
$1.07 for 1 day

Connect Print Subscription to Digital Access

Thank you for visiting Your Pilot subscription entitles you to unlimited digital access. Simply log in. From the home page, click on Subscription Services. Then click on "Pilot All Access Print Subscribers." It should show your phone number . If so, click "Sign Up." After a few seconds, it will take you back to the home page. Log out, then log back in. You're set! For any problems, call our customer service number at 910-693-2487 or 693-2488.

Free access for current print subscribers