“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.”

Those are the transcendent words that begin the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson. But was he a true American hero? Does he deserve the major monument building erected in his honor and superbly visible to all as they cross the Potomac into Washington, D.C.?

Let us consider some facts that can be assembled about the man. He owned more than 600 people over the course of his life and profited directly from the institution of slavery. It is also contended, with convincing evidence, that he fathered a number of children with one of those slaves.

Just stopping here, we might conclude that he was no hero, but just another enslaving despot who should have the historical cloak of heroism snatched from his back. But if we look closer — if we look broadly with an eye that is not only critical but discerning and circumspect — a singular conclusion becomes more difficult.

At the time of the American Revolution, Jefferson was actively involved in legislation that he hoped would result in slavery’s abolition. In a draft of the Virginia Constitution (actually the second draft he submitted on June 13, 1776) he would have prohibited the importation of enslaved Africans.

Then again, on June 18, 1779, he proposed an ordinance that would ban slavery in the Northwest territories. Admittedly, in a sea of complacency, he always maintained that the decision to emancipate slaves would have to be part of a democratic process.

Abolition would be stymied until slave owners consented to free their human property, together, in a large-scale, orchestrated act of emancipation. To Jefferson, it was contrary to the principles of the American Revolution for the federal government to enact abolition by forcing planters to free their slaves. He knew that realistically, it would never happen.

But in a preserved letter to Thomas Cooper on Sept. 10, 1814, he continued to describe slavery as a “moral depravity” and a “hideous blot,” and in another to William Short on Sept. 8, 1823, he voiced the opinion that slavery presented the greatest threat to the survival of the American nation.

Jefferson consistently espoused the opinion that slavery was contrary to the laws of nature, views that were radically liberal in a world of Southern states where slave labor was the norm and reality was that slavery was becoming more economically entrenched. The slave population in Virginia skyrocketed from 292,627 in 1790 to 469,757 in 1830.

Jefferson had hoped that the slave trade would weaken, and slavery would come to an end. Instead, slavery became more widespread — and profitable. In an attempt to erode Virginians’ support for slavery, he discouraged the cultivation of crops heavily dependent on slave labor, specifically tobacco, and encouraged the introduction of crops that needed less field labor, such as wheat, sugar maples, short-grained rice, olive trees and wine grapes. But by the 1800s, Virginia’s most valuable economic asset was neither crops nor land but slave labor.

Jefferson’s belief in the necessity of ending slavery never changed. From the mid-1770s until his death, he advocated the same plan of emancipation. First, the trans-Atlantic slave trade would be abolished. Second, slaveowners would “improve” slavery’s most violent features, by bettering — Jefferson used the term “ameliorating” — living conditions and moderating physical punishment. Third, all born into slavery after a certain date would be declared free, followed by total abolition.

Like others of his day, he supported the removal of newly freed slaves to the lands of their origin. However, the unintended effect of his plan was that the goal of “improving” slavery, as a step toward ending it, was used as an argument for its perpetuation. Pro-slavery advocates after Jefferson’s death argued that if slavery could be “improved,” abolition was unnecessary.

Jefferson had written that maintaining slavery was like holding “a wolf by the ear. We can neither hold him, nor safely let him go.” He was concerned that his cherished federal union, the world’s first democratic experiment, would be destroyed by slavery.

To emancipate all slaves, immediately, on American soil, Jefferson feared, could result in a large-scale race conflict that could be as brutal and deadly as the slave revolt in Haiti in 1791. But he also believed that to keep slaves in bondage, with part of America in favor of abolition and part of America in favor of perpetuating slavery, could only result in a civil war. It did, and the result was more young American deaths than any other war we have ever fought.

Our forefathers should have listened to him — early on — from the beginning. He was right. I submit that his monuments should stand.

Don Tortorice is a former attorney and professor at the Law School of the College of William and Mary.

(7) comments

John H Hamblen

Slavery ended in the Northern States 1804. Slavery ended in British Empire 1834.

Slavery was a common practice in many so called civilized nation untill the 19th century.

Yes Plantations were the life blood of the economy of the United States in the 18th and 19th century. Slavery in United States did not really end untill 1940 thru 1950. Tennant Farming like working in Industrial mills owned towns was a form of Slavery. So economics and growth were the real driver of unjust treatment of the lower working class. So we must be careful of our judgement of the Founding Fathers from the North and the South untill we look at our total history.

Sally Larson

All animals choose the easiest path towards personal gain and survival whether it's food or in the human form, money. As long as people are making money they will ignore the moral repercussions until forced into it by social expectations. In other words, if people can get away with it they will do it.

Kent Misegades

Well put. Nearly all the Founders as well as the leaders of the Confederacy frequently stated that slavery was destined to end. In all other countries around the world where slavery was legal and common in the 18th century - with people of all skin colors enslaved - the practice ended without the bloodshed and destruction caused by the Union. That fact alone is proof that the War of Northern Aggression was not fought over the question of slavery. I just finished reading the Personal Memoirs of Ulysses Grant, who failed at everything as an adult other than destroying property and killing people, especially his own troops. In his conclusions, he states “Prior to the time of these encroachments the great majority of the people of the North had no particular quarrel with slavery, so long as they were not forced to have it themselves.” They also had no major issue with the continuation of slavery during the war in six states controlled by the Union, namely Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia ( which unilaterally seceded from Virginia), Kentucky, Missouri and Tennessee. The bottom line - slavery was on its way to a peaceful end in the USA and the war could have been avoided. Its long, sad legacy rests on the shoulders of the Union states, the Secret Six that agitated for it, the railroaders who backed Lincoln’s campaign in exchange for federal support for their westward expansion, and mass murderers like Grant and Sherman who were among the most effective killing machines in human history.

Barbara Misiaszek

Kent, that "War of Northern Aggression" as you term it is known as "The War of the Great Rebellion" where I come from. Please get the terminology right in the future. We won.We get to write the history.

John Misiaszek

Mark Hayes

" We won " ? Which unit were you in ?

Barbara Misiaszek

The North won.The North gets to write the history.

John Misiaszek

Judi Rhodes

I prefer "the failed war of secession."

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

Get 24-7 digital-only access and support award-winning community journalism. This gives you access to thepilot.com and its electronic replica edition.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Already a Print Subscriber? Get Digital Access Free.

As a print subscriber , you also receive unlimited digital access. You can do that here. For any problems, call our customer service number at 910-693-2487 or 693-2488.

Free access for current print subscribers

Home Delivery

Get all the news of Moore County delivered to your home each Wednesday and Sunday with home delivery. Your home delivery subscription also includes unlimited digital access to thepilot.com.

Starting at
$27.82 for 90 days