House Speaker Nancy Pelosi should not have ripped up her copy of the State of the Union speech earlier this month. It was wrong of her to do it. But I digress.

This is in response to a column written by Lt. Gen. Marvin Covault (ret.) that appeared in the Feb. 12 edition of The Pilot. He is a very strong supporter of the president. He is entitled to his beliefs, as is everyone else. What he is not entitled to, however, is twisting the facts.

Gen. Covault focused on the president’s State of the Union speech and the speaker’s opposition to that speech. One should keep in mind that while the Constitution requires the president to provide Congress and the American people with his annual assessment of the country, it is not mandatory to do so in a joint session of the Congress. He must first be invited to speak to the Congress, an invitation that can only be extended by the speaker, which it was in January. He is a guest of the House. He hardly acted like a guest.

The general indicated that the president was factual for the full 82-minute speech. Rather than list the 20 to 30 examples of how this is not true, I invite any reader to Google any recognized fact-checking organization and inquire as to the speech. PolitiFact, NPR or Politico would be three sources. You will find that there were many misstatements, exaggerations, twisted statements and, yes, mistruths uttered by the president regarding everything from energy production to the economy to foreign affairs.

My focus, however, is Covault’s criticism of Pelosi. While she may be controversial, to not recognize her as one of the strongest speakers ever elected is to expose one’s naivete. You may not like her or her politics, but she is a strong leader of congressional Democrats and one of the most politically astute speakers in modern history.

Last spring, Pelosi made a statement, cited by Covault, indicating her opposition to any impeachment of the president “unless there was something so compelling, so overwhelming and so bipartisan in support of the impeachment process.” One should note that she was referring to the Mueller investigation, for which there was no impeachment resolution considered by the House. Her statement was not in response to Trump’s abuse of power phone call on July 25 to the president of Ukraine. However, once that call was made, and once the facts unraveled, the House had no choice but to begin impeachment proceedings. In fact, it was its duty.

Of course, there was no way the president was going to be found guilty by those lemmings in the Senate, including Senators Thom Tillis and Richard Burr, and thus removed from office, but the House moved on impeachment because it was the right thing to do.

As for Speaker Pelosi’s reactions to the president’s speech, Covault was wrong by implying she “sat on her hands” not applauding for the accomplishments of the guests of the president. Apart from awarding the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Rush Limbaugh for reasons totally unknown, the speaker did applaud each instance. The president made a mockery of what has become a tradition of inviting guests to his speech, but Pelosi and the Democrats still recognized them, except for Rush Limbaugh. Awarding the nation’s highest civilian honor to someone who has only further divided this country is wrong and diminishes the great accomplishments and humanitarian efforts of the other recipients.

As for what Covault calls “unforgivable behavior” by Pelosi, let’s also look at the president. He flat-out rejected her extended hand to shake. Further, the Republican members of the House chanted “four more years” like they were in a political rally. This was totally wrong and against any decorum of the House. Nevertheless, not a word of condemnation from Covault. Trump and the Republicans can do no wrong in his eyes.

In answer to Covault’s two questions at the end of his diatribe, both can be answered “yes.” Lowering prescription drug prices, improving health care, providing gun safety legislation, protecting our elections from foreign influence and protecting the environment are all examples of legislation passed by the House under Pelosi’s leadership since January 2019 and that lie on Sen. Mitch McConnell’s desk waiting for him to do something other than renaming post offices and approving federal judge nominees. And, yes, General, to be clear, I do love our country more than I dislike the president.

But I have a question for Covault and those of his ilk. Is there no limit to the president’s lying, his deceit, his acts of revenge and recrimination, his destruction of great institutions of our country that you will not accept? Or, are you willing, as Trump himself said, to let him “shoot someone on 5th Avenue and never lose a vote?”

There is a lot of blame to go around for what is wrong with this country. No one has clean hands here. But to disavow any wrongdoing on the part of the president is nothing more than blind loyalty with no substance.

Jim Hart, of Pinehurst, spent 38 years in Washington, D.C., as a lobbyist and chief of staff to four U.S. congressmen.

(8) comments

Peyton Cook

The columnist was watching a different State of the Union speech than I did. The Speaker failed to introduce the President with the proper traditional words. During the search she chewed her lip and appeared to not pay any attention. The kicker was tearing up a positive, upbeat and informative speech. Overall it was a great night for the President.

Kent Misegades

PolitiFact, NPR or Politico would be three sources? Why not also Mother Goose, just as factual as those three laughably slanted sources.

Conrad Meyer

38 years as a lobbyist in the swamp. Speaks volumes.

Jim Hart

just for the record, Conrad, I was not a lobbyist for 38 years. I lived in Washington for 38 years. I spent 32 working on behalf of people in Ohio helping with getting veterans assistance, working out individuals' problems with Social Security, working with local governments to help with federal funding, writing legislation that provided improved pension plans for workers, just to name a few things. And as for being a lobbyist, I worked to make sure pension legislation benefited those with 401k retirement plans, provide better education about saving for retirement, and helping to create better tax policy that helped the middle income earners. I worked on behalf of good honest hard working citizens for 38 years and am very proud of the work i did.

Conrad Meyer

Thanks for the clarification Jim - I appreciate it. Yet you would have to agree that the word lobbyist has a negative connotation these days - worse than Member of Congress, or lawyer. In the future, I'd suggest that the Pilot's tagline read something like "worked in Washington for the benefit of people in Ohio when interacting with the Federal Government" (or something to that effect). Sounds better in today's polarized environment doesn't it? (Personally I am involved in a lawsuit against the Obama Feds when they illegally seized our pension assets over 10 years ago. Might sound familiar if you helped people in the Mahoning Valley).

Jim Hart

I appreciate your suggestions, Conrad, and I understand your why you said what you did about lobbyists. I can only assure you that the negative connotation given to them is grossly overblown. YOu are talking about a handful of registered lobbyists, and we must all be legally registered, who have a history of not playing by the rules, but I can assure you that 99% do play by the rules. It is not worth the price to not do so. Please believe me when i tell you that as a lobbyist, I literally could not buy a cup of coffee for a Member of Congress or a member of that Congressman's staff. I could well be in violation of the law that would then subject me to criminal, not civil other words, I could have gone to jail. Most dont know this or believe it, but it is the law. and that is the truth. If you have any other questions, contact me at

Mark Hayes

Conrad Meyer, when someone has spent over three decades in Washington as a political aide, a lobbyist, and then defends those careers by stating " I can assure you " twice within a short reply, and then ask " please believe me ", " ending with " that is the truth ", well I believe you had it correct the first time.

Robert Zschoche

Speaking of blind loyalty, does the writer of this column explain/justify the calls for impeachment by members of congress and the Washington Post before Trump had executed any actions as President. How did you think it would play out when Dems did nothing for 3 years but search for an excuse to impeach. But we should thank the dems because now voters throughout the country will return Republicans to a majority in the house. Nancy's hand waving days will be over. Bob Zschoche Whispering Pines

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

Get 24-7 digital-only access and support award-winning community journalism. This gives you access to and its electronic replica edition.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Already a Print Subscriber? Get Digital Access Free.

As a print subscriber , you also receive unlimited digital access. You can do that here. For any problems, call our customer service number at 910-693-2487 or 693-2488.

Free access for current print subscribers

Home Delivery

Get all the news of Moore County delivered to your home each Wednesday and Sunday with home delivery. Your home delivery subscription also includes unlimited digital access to

Starting at
$27.82 for 90 days