There is a massive national debt but do we really care about it?

That’s a relevant question, but a hard one to answer definitively because the answer has to be yes and no.

We say we do care. Our elected leaders talk about it constantly, and in polls of national issues, it is invariably one of our top five. But, are we serious enough to hold our elected candidates to a meaningful standard of fiscal integrity? No, we aren’t.

During the last presidential campaign, candidate Trump promised that he would eliminate the nation’s debt in eight years. But so far, he has robustly steered in the opposite direction. His budgets have added $9.1 trillion to the national debt and if unchanged, will ultimately increase the total debt to $29 trillion, according to Congressional Budget Office projections.

When elected, candidate Trump promised two strategies to reduce the debt. He promised to grow the economy at 6 percent annually to increase tax revenues. But once in office, he lowered his growth estimate to 3.5 percent.

The 3 percent level is a healthy growth rate. When growth is more than that, it creates inflation. Too much money chases a plethora of speculative business projects. Irrational exuberance grips investors. They create a boom-bust cycle that ends in a recession.

But most recently, the president’s fiscal year 2020 budget lowered annual growth rates to between 2.4 percent and 2.9 percent. Remember, he had promised to achieve 4 percent growth — with tax cuts.

In his first 100 days, Trump released the outline of what would become the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2018. The big negative to increasing tax revenues came in the form of a cut to the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent beginning immediately after passage of the act. The top individual income tax rate also dropped to 37 percent. The corporate cuts are permanent, while the individual changes expire at the end of 2025. In a monument to fiscal irresponsibility, our tax-cut obsession eclipsed entirely any concern for the national debt.

According to the CBO, the new tax cuts will never stimulate the economy enough to make up for lost tax revenue. Tax cuts worked in the Reagan administration when the highest tax rate was 90 percent.

Trump’s second strategy was to “eliminate waste and redundancy in federal spending.” He preached cost-consciousness in his campaign. He was right that there is waste in federal spending. However, the problem isn’t finding it. Both Presidents Bush and Obama did that. The problem is cutting it. Each major spending program has a constituency that lobbies Congress very, very effectively. Eliminating benefits loses voters and contributors. Congress will agree to cut spending in someone else’s district, but not in their own. And the problem is, they all feel that way. There have been no cuts in government waste to come close to reducing, in any meaningful way, the national debt.

Any president must cut into the biggest programs to make an impact on the debt. More than two-thirds of government spending goes to mandatory obligations made by previous acts of Congress. To lower the debt, military spending must be trimmed. Yet in terms of pure expenditure, the current president is holding nothing back, in spite of the fact that our defense spending is more than China, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and India combined. And please note that all but two of those countries are allies.

After defense spending, only $676 billion remains to pay for everything else. You can’t reduce the debt without major cuts to defense and mandated benefit programs. Cutting waste simply will not do the job.

On Feb. 11 of this year, the U.S. debt exceeded $22 trillion. The CBO projects that interest alone will double in four years. Interest costs are projected to climb from $382 billion in 2019 to $921 billion by 2029. Over the next decade, interest will total nearly $7 trillion. We will soon be spending more on net interest costs than we do in other essential areas such as Defense and Medicare.

And, this year it is projected that interest alone will exceed what we spend on all national programs that serve children. But does that matter — does anyone care?

In spite of the lip service we pay to fiscal responsibility, as long as the president boasts that he has just passed the biggest tax cut in history and as long as that line is greeted with vigorous cheering and desultory inaction by Congress, it is proof that the answer is “no,” we simply don’t care.

Don Tortorice is a former attorney and professor at the Law School of the College of William and Mary.

(9) comments

Kent Misegades

If our $21T national debt - of which Mr. Obama contributed nearly half in a mere 8 years - is to be ignored, then I suggest we ignore our $210T unfunded liabilities, ie pensions for former government workers including military and teachers. My guess is that would not be very popular. Ignore debt and cutting expenses and you get a Weimar Republic or a Venezuela.

Sally Larson

One of the real problems with our debt is it's owned by foreign governments. "Foreign - $6.2 trillion. In June 2018, China owned $1.18 trillion of U.S. debt and Japan owned $1.03 trillion." Quoted in The Treasury Bulletin, June 2018. Who needs to go to war, they just need to call in their loan to ruin us. Ignoring our debt is irresponsible.

Barbara Misiaszek

Yes our debt is a problem. However, the ace in the hole is the Fed. can print money. That though comes with it's own problem,inflation. For those on fixed incomes, that's not a good thing.

John H Hamblen

If I am correct every US CITIZEN now owes approximately $ 69,000.00 the day they are born. Yes, we have allowed the Congressman and Senators to mortgage our Children and Grandchildren down the road to a financial collapse that the no one has ever seen. Guess what we have only our selves to blame.

ken leary

Michael Hudson: "and forgive them their debts" He describes various social/economic systems that came to failure throughout history. Many civilizations have seen financial collapse.

ken leary

Nobody is going to pay that debt. Ever. Stop talking about it like future generations are not only going to pay it off they are going to be able create surplus value for the corporations, and have enough to live on. It's silly.

Barbara Misiaszek

This sounds like socialism to me.

Barbara Misiaszek

Just Sunday a Pilot opinion writer commented that the Dems. wanted to tax too much. Hmmm. If we want to continue to spend we better start paying for it on a pay as you go basis ,or begin cutting costs,as the above author indicates. There are not any free lunches to be had.

John Misiaszek

ken leary

"There are not any free lunches to be had." Unless of course you are an arms manufacturer or connected to the system which protects financial terrorists who seem focused on privatizing any assets the bought and paid for politicians can obtain for them. Then it's sidle right up to the trough.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for Reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

Thank you for visiting and supporting award-winning community journalism. Not everyone wants to have a newspaper delivered to their home, but they want to keep up with the latest news in Moore County. Click here to gain digital-only access and support local journalism.

Starting at
$1.07 for 1 day

Connect Print Subscription to Digital Access

Thank you for visiting Your Pilot subscription entitles you to unlimited digital access. Simply log in. From the home page, click on Subscription Services. Then click on "Pilot All Access Print Subscribers." It should show your phone number . If so, click "Sign Up." After a few seconds, it will take you back to the home page. Log out, then log back in. You're set! For any problems, call our customer service number at 910-693-2487 or 693-2488.

Free access for current print subscribers