In an April 28 report, the Gallup Poll published data showing that 64 percent of all Americans favored allowing voters to vote by mail or absentee ballot.

There were differences among key demographic subgroups: 83 percent of Democrats said they favor such a measure, but only 40 percent of Republicans expressed the same sentiment. Among independents, 68 percent supported laws that would allow mail ballots, similar to the level among the aggregate of all Americans.

As the coronavirus loomed over the 2020 election, President Trump repeatedly attacked the concept of vote by mail. Unfortunately for him, that was a losing argument. A Brennan Center poll found that, in response to coronavirus, four out of five Americans believed states should give all voters the option of mail ballots during the November election. The poll tracked a recent Reuters poll that found 72 percent of Americans, including 65 percent of Republicans, wanted a mail ballot option.

This makes sense. Americans did not — and do not — want to put their health in jeopardy by going to crowded polling places. President Trump, however, saw a dark conspiracy afoot. He said voting by mail creates a “tremendous potential for voter fraud” and that it “doesn’t work out well for Republicans.”

Actually, it didn’t work out well for him, though it seemed to have done well for down-ballot Republicans. They gained seats in the U.S. House and will do no worse than 50 seats in the Senate.

The argument, though, misses the real issue, and that is whether the practice serves our democracy. If it promotes more voting, it reflects a positive voice of the people.

Essentially all states already allow vote-by-mail ballots, and it has been carried out with infinitesimal fraud. Five states run their elections almost entirely by mail. In 28 states and the District of Columbia, voters have the right to request a no-excuse absentee ballot.

There is also no evidence that vote-by-mail benefits one party more than another. It’s noteworthy that it is used in all states with Republican governors or legislatures. To bolster this conclusion, conservative publications and groups, such as The Washington Times, National Review and the American Enterprise Institute published pieces favoring mail-in voting.

If the president believes vote by mail is “corrupt,” he has essentially no data to prove it. Politicians of the right have repeatedly claimed that the 2016 and 2018 elections were marred by millions of people voting illegally. However, research reveals that such is essentially untrue.

Voter fraud is virtually nonexistent. The Brennan Center’s seminal report, “The Truth About Voter Fraud,” conclusively demonstrated that almost all allegations of fraud turned out to be baseless.

In a June 21 column in The Pilot, the writer made a serious point of voters registered in multiple states. Such registrations may be true, but multiple registrations do not prove fraudulent double voting.

For example, President Trump’s then-strategist, Steve Bannon, was registered to vote in Florida and New York, as reported by the Sarasota Herald-Tribune; Tiffany Trump, Mr. Trump’s youngest daughter, was registered in Pennsylvania and New York, as reported by NBC News; Sean Spicer, his former press secretary, was registered in both Virginia and Rhode Island; his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, was registered in New York and New Jersey, according to The Washington Post; and Steven Mnuchin, secretary of the Treasury, was registered in both New York and California, as reported by CNN.

They were all registered in multiple states, but there is no report that they voted more than once. The illusory claim that multiple registrations fosters vote fraud is contradicted by President Trump’s family and associates.

In a similar vein, the reports of dead people voting is a phantom argument. First, whenever a person dies, that fact is not usually correlated to the voting rolls. And there is no data to demonstrate voting by ghosts — or anyone who poses as the deceased. The data simply isn’t there, because if it were, right-wing pundits would be waving it like the checkered flag at a NASCAR race.

Finally, much is made of the fact that people continued to be carried on California voting rolls who were not eligible to vote. That is true, because they had moved to another state — or had died. The same is true of the voter rolls of Alabama, Oklahoma, Missouri and a score of other “red” states.

Don Tortorice is a former attorney and professor at the Law School of the College of William and Mary.

(5) comments

Roy Ross

Mail in voting leads to manipulation and leaves the door wide open for abuse. Ballot harvesting is a tried and true method used by the dem's in California to maintain a one party state, and mail in voting provides the perfect opportunity to enhance that process.

If you want good examples of fraud live in Chicago or California where there is a long and rich history of the lefts manipulation of elections at every level. I've lived in both.

In my opinion you have to be truly naive or politically strident to not believe that this past election was not manipulated in many areas of the country. Fortunately for those who were involved the media has their backs by denial that it ever exists.

Of course it could have been Chinese interference to get Biden elected...how about a 4 year investigation and a "Meuller Investigation".

Jim Tomashoff

This just out, in what must be terrible news to Kent, among others who regularly write on The Pilot's comment pages. Attorney General Barr has just announced that the Justice Department's investigation into voter fraud has found no evidence to substantiate Trump's ongoing assertions that he easily won the election. Now it seems that even Trump's hand-picked Attorney General has now joined "The Deep State" conspiracy to deny this President a second term. My gosh, it must have taken tens of thousands of co-conspirators to pull off the greatest fraud in the history of this Country. But never fear, Kent and his minions will ferret out the truth. Right?

WASHINGTON (AP) — "Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

His comments come despite President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that the election was stolen, and his refusal to concede his loss to President-Elect Joe Biden.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election.

“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.

The comments are especially direct coming from Barr, who has been one of the president’s most ardent allies. Before the election, he had repeatedly raised the notion that mail-in voter fraud could be especially vulnerable to fraud during the coronavirus pandemic as Americans feared going to polls and instead chose to vote by mail."

Mark Hayes

Jim, although there may not have been sufficient voter fraud to upend the election, there were some election fraud detected, had the election favored Trump, there would have been little doubt, Democrats would have cried foul, that alone should send out an alarm for future elections. Where there is a will, there is a way, and what worked for, can also work against. Personally I don't want to pay taxes that are used in spending the next four years with politicians doing little more than arguing among themselves, doing little else than getting paid. Unfortunately that has become the norm for our elected officials, those funding these cat fights are either you, me and others, it has become more of a sport than politics, and we are the spectators, only there to cheer or jeer.

Jim Tomashoff

Mark, I don't think you'd go so far as this, declaring martial law and redoing the election: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/michael-flynn-martial-law-new-election_n_5fc7d3e6c5b6f3fe59724a45 But I'm pretty sure Kent, and maybe some other "conservative" commenters, would love the see this happen, all in the name of defending "freedom" of course. I think your first thought might be, "Oh it's in the Huffington Post, a far-left progressive/socialist publication. But all they are doing is providing links and whole pages of appeals for this from the websites so arguing. What is the "same election fraud detected" to which you allude?

Mark Hayes

Jim, reading your comment, my first thought is, just what my comment above stated, no more. If you believe that there was no voter fraud and are 100% sure of that, well I guess we have nothing to discuss, have a good evening.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

The Pilot

Get unlimited digital access and support award-winning local journalism, for just $5 a month. This includes access to the electronic replica edition of The Pilot.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Already have a Print Subscription? Get Digital Access Free.

The Pilot

As a print subscriber, you also have unlimited digital access. Connect your account now. Or, call customer service at 910-693-2487 for help.

 

Our system has been updated, if you are a current print subscriber and cannot obtain your unlimited access, please contact customer support 910-693-2490. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Home Delivery

The Pilot

Our best deal: Get all the news of Moore County delivered to your home each Wednesday and Sunday — and receive unlimited digital access to thepilot.com.

Starting at
$27.82 for 90 days