Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once said free speech does not allow “falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic.” Thus, according to the Supreme Court, the Constitution allows states to adopt laws that regulate non-commercial signs.

This is evident in the state law that regulates political signs in the right of-way of state highways. You know, those environmentally obnoxious, vision-polluting road signs. My research shows that there is a high probability that most, if not all, of the political signs placed in the state right of ways at the Pinehurst Traffic Circle and in the Airport Road circle at N.C. 22 have been placed there illegally.

In doing research, I checked with the state Department of Transportation’s right of way office. They and their maps show the outside and entire inside of the Pinehurst and Airport Road circles are state “right of ways.”

State law allows political signs in the right of ways but only if seven conditions are followed. If those conditions are not met, a class 1 misdemeanor has been committed. Six of those conditions are listed. The signs: can’t be on a limited access highway; can’t be closer than 3 feet from a road; can’t obscure visibility; can’t be higher than 42 inches nor bigger than 864 square inches; and can’t obscure another sign.

The seventh condition, apparently ignored universally by the candidates, states that “the permittee must obtain the permission of any property owner … fronting the right of way where a sign would be erected.”

I have checked with some of the landowners whose properties front the Pinehurst or Airport Road right of ways. Unanimously, they have said that no candidate had sought permission, nor been given permission, to place a political sign in either of those circles.

How can it be that the guardians of our safety and our political leaders have unknowingly committed a crime? The answer appears to be straightforward

Instead of candidates taking it upon themselves to know the law, they have relied on the Board of Elections’ published summary of the conditions set forth in state law. That summary does not mention the requirement of permission from the fronting landowner. Permission of the adjoining landowner is set forth on another page published by the board where the statute, in its entirety, is printed. It is readily apparent that the candidates and their campaigns have not read the entire law, and their laziness has resulted in a commission of a crime.

It should be noted that the board also published the state’s littering statute, obviously as a warning to candidates. Since it appears that most, if not all, of the politicians or their agents have committed a crime by failing to comply with the state’s political sign law, it also follows that they have committed a second crime (littering), which is a class 3 misdemeanor and subject to a fine of no less than $250, nor more than $1,000.

There is an absurdity here that cannot be ignored. If the politician is a candidate for sheriff, district attorney or judge, who is going to prosecute and adjudicate the crime that has been committed?

There is one other 800-pound gorilla in the room: Even if the candidates fully complied, their actions would still, in all probability, be illegal littering. Why? Because it appears that the law regulating signs is unconstitutional.

In 2015, the Supreme Court said that laws regulating non-commercial signs are invalid if they differentiate signs on the basis of content. In this case, the state law only allows ‘“political sign”’ and not signs with other content; you are not allowed to put up signs such as “Jesus Saves,” in a state right of way.

UNC School of Government assistant professor Adam Lovelady in a blog post says: “ That statute … will need to be revised to either, prohibit all signs … or allow (all) … compliant signs … in the right of way.”

What can we do? As citizens tired of this ugly litter, maybe we should complain to the Pinehurst police chief or Moore County sheriff and demand prosecution. What would happen then?

Robert “Skip” Gebhardt is an attorney retired from the New York Bar and Florida Bar. He studied constitutional law at Georgetown University Law Center.

(5) comments

Chris Smithson

Does it seem like the signs are getting worse? Does it seem like this wasn't as big of a problem a few years back?

In 2011, the NC Legislature, including Moore County's representatives specifically carved out this exemption for political signs on state highways. Before that, regulation of such signs were considered to fall under municipal ordinances.

Conrad Meyer

Legal or illegal, I still hate the signs. Nothing more than litter on a stick (for the 10th time).

So are all you telling me that in our HOA, you can put signs on your own property?

Ken Owens

Thank you, Mr. Gebhardt for making the effort that the Village Council and all the political candidates have not made to research the sign problem.

Special thanks for pointing out that the signs are unconstitutional.

Mr. Cook is mistaken. The signs are not legal.

I have already contacted our representatives.

After this election cycle, if I ever see a political sign again, I will file a complaint with the Pinehurst Police and the Moore County Sheriff. The fact that the Board of Elections 'hid' the fact that candidates must obtain permission of landowners. That show how political the unconstitutional statute is.

Peyton Cook

My understanding is that political speech is “protected “ speech. Signs on public land are legal. Any on private land without permission are illegal. Since this is the “silly” season they are part of the landscape. In a Communist nation there are no elections or the candidates are selected by the ruling leader. So be thankful that we can cast secret ballots.

Kent Misegades

Placing a campaign sign on private property is inconsiderate of the property’s owner who has every right to remove them. Leaving signs up after elections is a reflection of the character of the candidate and his supporters, regardless the outcome. On campaigns I supported in years past we worked hard to keep signs upright and according to such ordinances and we picked them all up within a day or two of the election. Otherwise signs are important and an American tradition and great expression of citizen politicians - not elections of parties as is the case in other countries.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

Get 24-7 digital-only access and support award-winning community journalism. This gives you access to thepilot.com and its electronic replica edition.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Already a Print Subscriber? Get Digital Access Free.

As a print subscriber , you also receive unlimited digital access. You can do that here. For any problems, call our customer service number at 910-693-2487 or 693-2488.

Free access for current print subscribers

Home Delivery

Get all the news of Moore County delivered to your home each Wednesday and Sunday with home delivery. Your home delivery subscription also includes unlimited digital access to thepilot.com.

Starting at
$27.82 for 90 days