Of all the times I’ve done school drop-off over the years, the hardest was Monday, Dec. 17, 2012.

That prior Friday had been the horrific shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. Parents and schools across the country wrestled all weekend with how to approach Monday.

That morning, our sixth-grade daughter got on the bus as usual. Ayden, in kindergarten, also normally rode the bus, but I chose that day to drop him off at Pinehurst Elementary.

I will never forget the scene at the drop-off lane. Police cars lined the curb. Unsmiling officers stood on the sidewalks in positions of vigilance. Military-fatigued parents walked back and forth.

Ayden endured a too-long hug and kiss and walked blithely into school. Tears still roll down my cheeks when I think back on that day.

Newtown, CT; Marysville, WA; Roseburg, OR, Rancho Tehama Reserve, CA; Parkland, FL; Santa Fe, TX — our children have grown up in an age of mass school shootings and our struggle to respond appropriately.

The days of open schoolhouse doors were gone before these shootings, but in their wake security measures have taken on greater urgency. Heavier doors, controlled access that requires buzzers, surveillance cameras, greater police presence — they’ve all come at a cost. We have all paid it willingly for the sake of our children’s safety and security and a belief that we at least are not standing still. We have hardened our schools while trying not to harden our hearts.

But again, what’s an appropriate level of security? Let’s not fool ourselves. No amount of security can prevent an act of madness. The doors at Sandy Hook were locked and secured; the gunman shot his way in. At Parkland, an armed officer was on campus but out of position.

Everyday life is full of risk and trade-offs. How far do we go to obtain a reasonable sense of security?

This question has weighed on me for two weeks since receiving an automated call from Moore County Schools advising that the district would soon partner with Southern Pines-based K2 Solutions to use detection dogs for random searches for drugs and weapons in the five middle schools and three high schools. Since I have a child in each, this hit home, literally.

Moore County has used police dogs in the past for random searches and displays of deterrence. But the cops are busy and can’t spare their dogs’ time. So on Feb. 14, Moore County Schools entered a contract with K2.

The first word of this came in Schools Superintendent Bob Grimesey’s February monthly communication to the Board of Education.

“MCS and K2 Solutions have entered into a … mutually beneficial partnership that, at no cost to the district, would provide a canine presence for safety and security purposes specifically for the deterrence and detection of drugs, weapons, or explosives on Moore County Schools campuses,” his briefing states.

It goes on: “There are elements of our plan that we prefer not to share with the general public as doing so might limit the intended impact. For this reason, I encourage you to contact Dr. Seth Powers directly with any questions related to this partnership and its operation.”

In The Pilot’s story last Sunday, Powers said the dogs would be limited to common areas like courtyards, parking lots and cafeterias, and that no individual student would be sniffed. He said that “a number of our secondary principals” asked about having the dogs as a show of deterrence, more than anything else.

Last Monday, I asked for a copy of the district’s contract with K2. Three days later, I got a copy moderately blacked out by school attorneys. The exact scope of work and details are redacted, so we still don’t know what will be done. I posted the documents with this column on thepilot.com.

Some details that weren’t censored:

  • K2 can’t search so as to bias a particular group of students;
  • The company can’t use “canines that are commonly perceived as aggressive.” Breeds specified include German shepherd, Belgian Malinois and pit bull.
  • With a principal’s permission, K2 can bring puppies to elementary schools “for socialization purposes as part of the training for future detection canines. As a part of this early training young canines will only search for toys.”

So just how real is the threat to our schools? To answer that, I studied 10 years of data on “reportable crimes” submitted by Moore County Schools to the state Department of Public Instruction. The state issues a report annually cataloguing each district’s report of serious offenses. These range from assault, arson, robbery and bomb threat to possession of a firearm, possession of drugs, or possession of weapons other than a gun.

Here’s what that data showed:

  • Going back to the 2008-09 school year, Moore County has reported seven instances of possession of a firearm. Of that number, three were in 2008-09. So in the last nine years, there have been four incidences of weapons among its 23 schools.
  • Possession of weapons other than a firearm: 336 incidences reported over 10 years. There’s no detail on what weapons, but I’d guess many were pocket knives, hunting knives — in deer season some kids have their knives handy — or mace.
  • Possession of drugs other than alcohol: 579 incidences over 10 years.

The number of reportable offenses has also been trending down over the years. In 2008-09, there were 148 reported incidents. Last year, there were 112, the highest count since 2009-10, when 132 offenses were reported.

The school district says the mere appearance of the dogs deters bad behavior. I think I know the juvenile mind — as the parent of two of them — enough to say that kids aren’t rational thinkers. They’re more likely to try to sneak something by a dog, assuming they even remember they’re carrying contraband on them.

In the end, three main things bother me about this whole deal.

First, where’s the documented need? Will this contract make our kids safer than they are now? How does one quantify that? By the mere presence of a deterrent? If the presence of weapons is a significant problem — and the data doesn’t support that — then take the logical step some other school districts have done and install metal detectors. Make kids carry only clear bags. That’ll be more of a deterrent than a random search from a dog team.

Second, the district is proud that this service is free. But what it’s really doing is providing free training opportunities to a private business, K2. The company is obtaining valuable time putting its dogs in crowds and developing feedback on those animals they can then use for their own commercial purposes.

Moore County Schools is helping to build a better detection dog and getting no compensation for it. So if we’re really going to do this, how about we bid this out and get some value from our kids? Sound mercenary? It kind of already is.

Lastly, at what point do we sacrifice the notion of freedom for security? Would our schools be safer if a fencing contractor offered free concertina wire around the perimeter? Absolutely. What about parking a donated military-surplus armored personnel carrier at the front entrance? Let’s drop our objections and just allow teachers to carry firearms or Tasers.

I want my children — your children — safe at school. And they are — more so than they were five or 10 years ago.

But in the process, are we conditioning them to life under a state of constant surveillance? It all feels rather dystopian.

Most kids will just shrug off the prospect of random dog searches. They’re so keyed in to security, they’re not likely to understand what they’re sacrificing for it. Do we?

(5) comments

ken leary

I'm going to have to look into this Mark. Your point is that all of our economic, political, and social problems, the fact that our main export is death and destruction, that our representatives are all bought and consider the interests of Boeing, General Electric, Booze Allen, etc, before their constituents, that people are dying due to lack of income, medical care, a war on safety regulations, and despair, that we have to continuously expand the systems of violence ( ICE, Border police, canine patrols, private prisons, Prisons, Prison guards, FBI, CIA, ATF, DEA, militarized community police gangs, School of the America programs, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, is all because of the influence of the arts and Hollywood? And here I thought the USA's owners just wanted to dominate the world and its resources for their own profit no matter how many people had to suffer and die. Thanks for straightening that out for me.

Mark Hayes

Ken, look behind you, I believe my comment may have passed over .

ken leary

This is just another normalizing step perpetrated by a sociopathic group bent on consolidating their authority and control over externalities. "We the people" are the externalities. Our needs and wants are irrelevant if they are in conflict with the power structures agenda. Hence their need for militarized police, secrecy, the FBIs cointelpro legacy, the CIAs drone wars, the AUMF which negates constitutional law, perpetual, incessant war, the ability to magically make themselves financially whole when their scams go belly up by robbing "we the people" etc. The noose is tightening. The "dogs" are just another link in the chain intended to maintain control through the use of state sponsored violence. You should be frightened for your children. Any economist not affiliated with the status quo will tell you that the next economic failure of this existing system is just around the corner. That is when the Boltons, Pompeos, Trumps, Abrams, Cheneys will need their dogs; and all the nationalist numbnuts with guns will be searching the abyss for someone to blame. We didn't get to having someone suggest bringing dogs to police children over night. It is a process. Wake up.

Mark Hayes

Ken... Gotta hand it to you, this is one of your most entertaining comments to date. The content has the reminiscence of a Ted Kaczynski manifesto, along with overtones rebuking of Alexandria Ocasio Cortez planned Socialist government, although you cannot have it both ways. What you have failed to mention, the root cause of much of the problem, Hollywood celebrities and their masters, those that make millions peddling movies with horrific scenes of violence. And then there is the music industry with the violent music videos, gang slang, glorification of drugs and guns, all have demonized Trump and his associates. The profiteers of this have been those singers,rappers, and actor celebrities, who promote acts of violence. Many gave celebrity performances for their Democratic favorite, of those many have rap sheets and criminal records. Economic failure will occur if we continue to provide government programs that are funded by 35% of the population in order to appease the other 65%. Wake up.

Kent Misegades

I’d bet there is little need for this at home, private and charter schools. Send your children to government schools and this is what you get.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for Reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

Thank you for visiting ThePilot.com and supporting award-winning community journalism. Not everyone wants to have a newspaper delivered to their home, but they want to keep up with the latest news in Moore County. Click here to gain digital-only access and support local journalism.

Starting at
$1.07 for 1 day

Connect Print Subscription to Digital Access

Thank you for visiting ThePilot.com. Your Pilot subscription entitles you to unlimited digital access. Simply log in. From the home page, click on Subscription Services. Then click on "Pilot All Access Print Subscribers." It should show your phone number . If so, click "Sign Up." After a few seconds, it will take you back to the home page. Log out, then log back in. You're set! For any problems, call our customer service number at 910-693-2487 or 693-2488.

Free access for current print subscribers