What is a wealth tax? Today, wealthy Americans pay taxes on things like yachts and fine art when they purchase them, but not after. A wealth tax would make them pay taxes on their assets every year.

Democratic presidential candidate

Elizabeth Warren would apply an annual asset tax of 2 percent on households worth more than $50 million and 6 percent of worth greater than $1 billion (recently revised up from 3 to 6 percent).

There are some significant downsides to the wealth tax that the Democratic presidential candidates fail to mention while campaigning. First, rich folks do not put their excess cash under a mattress; they invest it and pay taxes on the interest and dividends. The wealth tax takes money out of the hands of those who invest and provide the continuous flow of capital which, of course, is the fuel for capitalism.

Second, the wealth tax would apply to an estimated 75,000 households. There are already 73,500 full-time IRS employees. How many more thousands of employees would they need to expertly administer the wealth tax? Big government getting bigger.

Third: Wealthy people have competent tax lawyers who know how to apply tax avoidance measures. The only way to prevent this is to rewrite the tax code and eliminate the loopholes. Additionally, the wealthy can move assets to trusts and family foundations or shift property among generations.

Fourth: The wealth tax is a proven failed system. In 1990, a dozen nations in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development imposed wealth taxes. By last year, it was down to three. France was the latest casualty.

Fifth: A significant amount of wealth held by the rich is in hard-to-value assets, such as art. Will the valuation be accomplished in 75,000 households by thousands of contract experts or by IRS amateurs? How will the taxpayers appeal contested valuations? Thousands of households could end up in litigation for months or years.

So let’s look at a possible scenario. A 40-year-old entrepreneur is worth $500 million and therefore required to pay a wealth tax. His 2 percent wealth tax due is $10 million. Because he consistently invests excess cash and after paying state and federal income taxes, he is short of cash to pay the wealth tax.

Not to worry, Elizabeth Warren says, “l have a plan.” Rather than force the taxpayer to sell resources and pay cash, he can tender a portion of his non-liquid assists to the government. Now he has a new business partner who may well be some nameless, faceless, possibly incompetent bureaucrat in Washington. Extend this over the next 20 or 30 years, 2 percent every year, and what does he have remaining? Then he dies and his estate pays a 40 percent death tax on the remaining assets. This is a nightmare scenario that could play out across the country.

Because of the downside reasons to these things above, rich people figure out how to move their wealth abroad. This is the principle reason other countries dropped the wealth tax.

Warren has developed the wealth tax issue in response to questions about how she proposes to pay for Medicare for All. And she sells this new tax revenue stream as if it is all that will be needed. The wealth tax on personal fortunes exceeding $50 million would raise $3.75 trillion over the next decade, ($375 billion per year) as part of the $34 trillion needed. That $375 billion would provide about 13 percent of what is required for one year of Medicare for All. Will the middle class pick up the remaining 87 percent?

Warren’s economic advisers, Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman, have been widely criticized by economists writing for The Wall Street Journal as being overly optimistic about both the amount of wealth tax that will be available for Medicare for All and also for the overall cost of Medicare for All.

While it has been widely reported and generally accepted that Medicare for All will cost about $34 trillion over a 10-year period, Warren and her advisers have set that figure at $22.5 trillion. Thereafter their tax-raising goal has been $22.5 trillion, or $2.25 trillion per year.

As if the above numbers are not misleading enough, Warren also claims Medicare for All will actually save money because of economies of scale for a government-run program. There is zero data to support such an outrageous claim, but there are numerous examples of the incompetence of government whenever it is charged with running a large operation.

For example, government-run Amtrak has reported operating losses every year since its inception in 1971, averaging $900 million per year with 93 percent of its routes unprofitable. The per-ticket taxpayer subsidy over the past five years has been $51 per Amtrak ticket sold.

It’s time to look at the whole Medicare for All story. And while you are at it, look at Warren’s list of 56 other new programs that will require more funding, more government control, more bureaucracy and more regulation.

Lt. Gen. Marvin L. Covault U.S. Army (ret.), is the author of “Vision to Execution,” a book for leaders.

(7) comments

Peyton Cook

A wealth tax is double taxation. Therefore, it is likely unconstitutional.

Mark Hayes

I always look forward to the reasonable columns being criticized by the ineptness and ignorance that follows, it must be a challenge to go so far of course. Now, where were we on this Healthcare issue ? If taxes are going to fund this proposed healthcare plan for all, free tuition, college debt forgiveness, along with welfare, government subsidized entitlements, and a list of other government programs longer than a assembly line, how will it be funded when the next economic downturn returns, and it will return. Politician know it will, along with any mentally competent person that pays taxes, only those feeding off the works of others are those not concerned, they never seem to be without. Best way to survive a recession, already be a member of the government entitlement programs. Sanders, Warren, Biden, all are at the age where they will never feel the impact of the burden of these grandiose proposals, all are dependent on the economic estimates and predictions of some bean counter who will fade into the shadows when the funding falls short, what then ?

ken leary

Who do you mean by those "feeding off the works of others?" Are you talking about the trillions of dollars created by the Fed to prop up the financial terrorists? Are you talking about the subsidies given to the extraction industries? Are you talking about the so called defense industries? Are you talking about people like Mnuchin who are allowed by people like Kamala Harris to rob people of their homes? Or are you talking about people trying to feed their children? Probably the latter. Be specific. If you are suggesting that I am 'inept and ignorant' I'll grant you that may be the case; but I'm on page 359 of Steve Keen's "Debunking Economics", and I will challenge you to read it. I've read most of Piketty's book. I've read Michael Hudson's and Mark Blyth's books, etc. I'm trying to emerge from my ignorance rather than cowering in my need to punish others in order to feel better about myself. And Peyton, can't say much for your reading for comprehension skills.

Mark Hayes

More impressed I could not be. I would challenge you to read Susan Krauss Whitbourne Ph.d titled " 7 Things Insecure People Do To Try To Seem Important ", I'm sure that the General and Peyton were forced to make a decision, enter the Military and become leadership officers , or spend their lives as a dashboard contracting handymen, a nail bending wood butcher, ending up as a disgruntled belittling narcissistic condescending individual.

ken leary

As I have suggested previously, you should probably write about events of which you have some knowledge or experience. I'd really like to hear your opinion on the Gallagher pardon, the recent revelations concerning Afghanistan, or maybe your experience during the Los Angles riots. A statement such as, "First, rich folks do not put their excess cash under a mattress; they invest it and pay taxes on the interest and dividends" should make anyone with any awareness of reality doubt the veracity of your article. Perhaps you are unaware of the Panama papers, or any other information regarding the trillions of dollars squirreled away in offshore accounts. That must be it. You wouldn't purposely gaslight us would you?

Peyton Cook

Not one word to refute what he has written. He is absolutely correct.

Kent Misegades

In the 1800s England imposed a tax on windows to fund its growing Navy and colonies. Tenement and factory owners bricked in the windows to avoid the tax, leading to darkness, lack of fresh air and epidemics. Dickens’ ‘Oliver Twist’ describes these conditions well. The best tax is no tax - achieved by lowering government costs. This implies shutting down all government activities that are not among the enumerated powers or are offered by the private sector. This of course includes all forms of education as well as things like government trash collection. Stop paying people not to work - end Welfare of all forms including Medicaid. For the remaining small need for taxes for national defense and to pay down our national debt, replace all forms of taxation by the Fair Tax, a single tax on all new products and services. No exceptions through loopholes allowed. This would eliminate the need for tax returns, tax attorneys, most lobbies, the IRS and NCDOR, etc. Everyone pays the same percentage, including illegals. Tax successful people and they simply create wealth in other places where taxes are lower. Even the great Pocahontas can not stop people from leaving.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for Reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

Thank you for visiting ThePilot.com and supporting award-winning community journalism. Not everyone wants to have a newspaper delivered to their home, but they want to keep up with the latest news in Moore County. Click here to gain digital-only access and support local journalism.

Starting at
$1.07 for 1 day

Connect Print Subscription to Digital Access

Thank you for visiting ThePilot.com. Your Pilot subscription entitles you to unlimited digital access. Simply log in. From the home page, click on Subscription Services. Then click on "Pilot All Access Print Subscribers." It should show your phone number . If so, click "Sign Up." After a few seconds, it will take you back to the home page. Log out, then log back in. You're set! For any problems, call our customer service number at 910-693-2487 or 693-2488.

Free access for current print subscribers