By now, I assume most of you have figured out that I’m not a huge fan of Sen. Ted Cruz. I’m even less of a fan, however, of what passes for journalism in this country these days, by which I mean the shallow, image-driven, trivia-obsessed folderol that seeks to find the “gotchas” in the most ridiculous things.

Did Obama ordering orange juice on the campaign trail mean he’s not a “regular guy” who can relate to the kind of simpletons these overpaid celebrity journalists assume we are? Did Hillary Clinton not tipping in a diner mean she’s insensitive to working people, or did her overtipping mean she’s a “limousine liberal” who’s insensitive to working people? And on and on.

One of the most obnoxious practitioners of this kind of “celebrity” journalism dressed up as political analysis is Mark Halperin, who goes out of his way to prove that being a “senior political analyst for Time magazine, Time.com, and MSNBC” (according to his Wikipedia entry) does not mean you’re not a shallow, clueless hack.

This became painfully clear from viewing Halperin’s latest atrocity, an interview with Sen. Cruz for Bloomberg.com that was so embarrassing (not to mention more than a little racist), it actually made me feel bad for the candidate. Yes, you heard that right. I actually felt bad for the “Green Eggs and Ham” guy. It really was that awful.

The interview started off with Halperin asking Cruz, who’s Cuban-American, if he thought Hispanics would vote for him. This was bad enough. It became truly cringe-worthy when Halperin prefaced his next line of questioning with “people are interested in you and your identity.” Oh, dear, I thought, this will not end well.

Halperin asked if Cruz listed himself as “a Hispanic” when he applied to Princeton and to Harvard Law School. Of course, Cruz responded, that’s part of his heritage. Then the wheels really began to come off. Halperin began grilling Cruz about whether he had an “affinity for or connection to, anything part of your Cuban past.”

He asked such hard-hitting questions as: Does Cruz have a favorite Cuban food? Does he like Cuban music? Could he identify his favorite Cuban singer? And then, as I watched in fascinated horror, Halperin hit rock bottom — and started to dig.

“I want to give you the opportunity to directly welcome your colleague Sen. Sanders to the race,” he said, “and I’d like you to do it, if you would, en español.”

To his credit, Cruz declined to be Halperin’s dancing Cuban pony. “You know,” he said, “I’m going to stick to English, but I appreciate the invitation, Señor.” It may shock you, but I will give the senator mad respect for not saying, as I did while I was watching this train wreck online, “Mr. Halperin, what the [bad word] is wrong with you?”

I mean, really. Can you even imagine asking Hillary Clinton, “So, who’s your favorite white musician? Do you like mac and cheese? Say something white to welcome Sen. Bernie Sanders to the race!” Or, for that matter, asking Sanders, “So, how about that Jewish food? Gefilte fish, am I right? Do you have a favorite klezmer band? While we’re at it, can you say something in Yiddish to Hillary Clinton?”

One thing is for sure: We need to keep Mark Halperin as far away from Dr. Ben Carson as we can.

Look, there’s a lot to criticize when it comes to Ted Cruz. I’ve done it recently, and I’m sure that before this whole long electoral nightmare is over, I’ll do it again. But I really do not give a rat’s wazoo about the music he listens to or whether he eats the food of his forbears. And I don’t think the vast majority of the American people do either, just as they are incredibly uninterested in the dining, tipping or musical inclinations of JEB!, Mike Huckabee, Rand Paul, et. al.

Ask them how they’re going to deal with the rapidly growing income gap in this country, if they plan to at all. Ask them about how they’re going to fix our crumbling infrastructure. Ask them about their position on warrantless surveillance, assassination by drone, or nuclear proliferation.

In other words, Mr. Halperin and others of your ilk, do your freakin’ jobs for a change.

(6) comments

Tom Hill

What a hilariously hypocritical column, amidst the hundreds of similar light weight questions lobbed at Democrats by so called journalists. But of course this guy was guilty of deviating from the liberal medias game plan of always lobbing hard hitting questions to opponents of liberal ideas.

Richard Wright

Halperin was over the line, playing games rather than ask relevant questions. Would he ask Warren about her Native American heritage, you know the one where Warren said "well she looks like a Native American in old pictures. Halperin's questions were racist on the surface and liberal quack speak at their best.

I can see Halperin asking Hillary something like "Bill said you have Bill's to pay. May I ask exactly what bills you have that amount to $25M annually?"
Or to Bernie "Senator, since you have lived off the taxpayers since 1981, what makes you qualified to tell others that they do not pay enough taxes? And why do you believe in Marx and socialism in a few words?"

Roger Glass

Rusty, One way to avoid these types of questions would be for a candidate to avoid any news conferences with interviews. Oh, wait, that role is reserved for Hillary. Perhaps one day she will break from her staged appearances and you can comment on her.

Conrad Meyer

Speaking of "celebrity" journalism, how about that ankle-biter George Stephanopoulos laying into Peter Schweizer, the author of the book "Clinton Cash" this past week? (Great book, by the way - all liberals should read it before voting).

We all know little George was a big player in the Clinton regime - we saw his smiling face at White House pressers for years. But wait, little George was contributing $25,000 a year to the much maligned Clinton Foundation, and he FAILED to notify ABC or have the integrity to let someone else do the interview. His paltry apology is not accepted in this household. This man has no integrity and should be ashamed of himself. But then again, who has any integrity left when they get cozy with the Clintons?

Frank Staples

Did I read that right, Dusty?? Not a "huge fan of Sen. Ted Cruz"??? You're not a fan of any Republican or Conservative and you've never met a liberal you couldn't bend over and kiss the hiney of no matter how slimy or crooked that individual might be...billary and bumma come to mind rather quickly.

gail hanley

Dusty, none of the candidates will be able to fix anything. The best thing they can do is get out of the way of the innovators. They have always been America's best chance. Better worry about them instead of some political hack no matter what team they play on.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for Reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

Thank you for visiting ThePilot.com and supporting award-winning community journalism. Not everyone wants to have a newspaper delivered to their home, but they want to keep up with the latest news in Moore County. Click here to gain digital-only access and support local journalism.

Starting at
$1.07 for 1 day

Connect Print Subscription to Digital Access

Thank you for visiting ThePilot.com. Your Pilot subscription entitles you to unlimited digital access. Simply log in. From the home page, click on Subscription Services. Then click on "Pilot All Access Print Subscribers." It should show your phone number . If so, click "Sign Up." After a few seconds, it will take you back to the home page. Log out, then log back in. You're set! For any problems, call our customer service number at 910-693-2487 or 693-2488.

Free access for current print subscribers