The size of the Moore County Board of Education will be reduced to seven members next year under a law enacted late Thursday afternoon by the N.C. General Assembly.

The state Senate gave final approval Thursday morning to legislation that eliminates one of the three at-large seats. The House quickly gave its concurrence several hours later by 108-0 vote since the reduction was added to a bill that chamber passed earlier this year allowing the  Moore County Board of Commissioners to look into redrawing its residency districts to make them more geographically compact.

Sen. Jerry Tillman, who represents Moore and Randolph counties, added the school board reduction provision to the bill, which had been held up in the Senate Rules Committee since April.

State Rep. Jamie Boles, who sponsored the original redistricting bill at the commissioners’ request, supported the reduction.

"There was no controversy, so we pushed it on through," he said Thursday evening.

The commissioners and school board voted to back the reduction, both agreeing that it would be better to have an odd number of members to avoid situations such as the one that happened last December, when it took 78 votes to break a four-four deadlock to elect a chairman.

“I believe it was appropriate for Rep. Boles to pursue this legislation, which will provide for Moore County to join the vast majority of districts in the state that have odd-numbered boards,” school board Chairman Bruce Cunningham said Thursday morning.

Under the legislation, the school board will have five members who must live in the districts they represent but are elected countywide — just like the five commissioners — and two at-large members.

Under the legislation, the seats for Districts 1, 2, 4 and 5 will be up for election next year — the same as it is now under the current eight-member setup. The District 3 and two at-large seats, instead of three, will be up for election two years later, in 2018. The District 3 seat is currently held by Charles Lambert.

In order to bring the board down to seven members next year, the terms of two at-large members, Libby Carter and Pamela Thompson, who were appointed to fill unexpired terms created by resignations earlier this year, will end. Voters will then elect one member to serve out an at-large term through 2018.

That would potentially pit Carter and Thompson against each other should they decide to run for election to serve out the term. Ed Dennison also holds an at-large seat and was re-elected last year.

“It is my understanding that Ed Dennison’s at-large seat will not be affected,” Cunningham said. “Both Pam and Libby, as well as any other persons interested in serving on the school board, would have to run for the same seat.”   

Carter and Thompson were appointed to fill the unexpired terms of Sue Black and Becky Carlson, who were elected as at-large members last year. Black and Carlson resigned, along with Kathy Farren and Ben Cameron, under tremendous public pressure two days after voting to fire Superintendent Bob Grimesey on June 4. A scaled-down board voted June 8 to reinstate Grimesey.

Farren, who represented District 2, was replaced by Helena Wallin-Miller. Cameron, who represented District 1, was replaced by Stacey Caldwell. Those two seats, along with the District 5 seat now held by Chairman Bruce Cunningham and the District 4 seat held by Laura Lang, are up for election next year. Lang was among the five who voted to fire Grimesey. She refused to resign.

In the fallout from the Grimesey firing, which drew nearly universal public condemnation, momentum also built for having a recall election process to replace the five members who fired Grimesey. Boles obtained a temporary restraining order the day after the firing to prevent the board as it was constituted then from hiring a permanent superintendent to give him time to have legislation passed for a recall process should the five members refuse to resign.

Since four of the five resigned the following day, Boles said the need for a recall process was not as urgent. But he has vowed to push for it during next year’s legislative session.

The Board of Commissioners voted to support seeking legislation for a recall election process, initially asking that Moore County be added to a House-passed bill for Stanly County. The board later backed off that idea. But after another public outcry, the board voted to ask Boles to pursue a recall provision.

The Stanly County bill was recently changed and would now allow for partisan elections of the school board in that county. Ten other counties were added to the bill, including Lee and Harnett.

“We did not want to get caught up in the controversy,” Boles said of the partisan election issue. “That is something we don’t want.”

A push for partisan elections of the Moore County Board of Education in the late 1990s was derailed by heavy public opposition. School board members in Moore County do not run under political party labels.

Boles said the idea of a recall still has merit. He said he wants to make sure it is done correctly and not in haste.

“That is something we will have to look at next session,” he said.

Staff writer John Lentz contributed to this report.

(4) comments

David Lambert

This example works especially well since Thompson and Carter will already have to run in 2016. (But as it stands now they will have to run again in 2018 to keep seats) District 1 seat held by Caldwell can be moved to 2018 and it will be closer to a full term.

David Lambert

To fix the problem with electoral opportunity we only need to have one At-Large seat elected during each election cycle.

Possibly:

2016:
District 5 (Cunningham)
District 4 (Lang)
District 2 (Wallin-Miller)
At Large Seat (Thompson/Carter seat)

2018:
District 3 (Lambert)
District 1 (Caldwell)
At-Large Seat (Dennison)

Currently all the district seats are are up in 2016 except for District 3. District three and all 3 At-large seats (2 now) are up in 2018.

Betty McGuire

David what is your proposed solution to this issue? You may have put it forward before but I have forgotten.

David Lambert

Glad that it is an odd number!!! But, this is not enough. We need to have one At-Large seat in each election... The current and proposed solution (which lumps the At-Large seats in with District 3) ignores very real issues about electoral opportunity for the residents of District 3.

District 3 residents will still only be allowed to vote for a member of their community every four years while everyone else can vote for a neighbor every 2 years.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

The Pilot

Get unlimited digital access and support award-winning local journalism, for just $5 a month. This includes access to the electronic replica edition of The Pilot.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Already have a Print Subscription? Get Digital Access Free.

The Pilot

As a print subscriber, you also have unlimited digital access. Connect your account now. Or, call customer service at 910-693-2487 for help.

 

Our system has been updated, if you are a current print subscriber and cannot obtain your unlimited access, please contact customer support 910-693-2490. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Home Delivery

The Pilot

Our best deal: Get all the news of Moore County delivered to your home each Wednesday and Sunday — and receive unlimited digital access to thepilot.com.

Starting at
$27.82 for 90 days