TEASER Moore County Schools sign

Some school board members would like to put the brakes on Moore County Schools’ implementation of new state guidelines for teaching social studies.

Effective this fall, North Carolina’s standard course of study will more actively incorporate the contributions and experiences of women and minorities throughout history. The state’s standards for social studies have been rewritten at each level from kindergarten through eighth grade, and for each high school social studies course.

A team of about two dozen Moore County Schools teachers is currently combing through the new standards. Their goal is to develop a framework for how teachers in each grade and class might structure their teaching in accordance with the new guidelines.

But in the interest of time, they’re starting that work before the state’s Department of Public Instruction finishes writing its own supporting documents for those standards.

That process hit a snag earlier this month when the State Board of Education delayed a vote on the first set of materials related to the new standards. Those materials included a “crosswalk” comparing the previous standards to the new ones in kindergarten through 12th grade and a glossary of terms that frequently appear in the standards.

But due to an oversight, the glossary presented to the state board was a draft that had not been fully edited. In addition to misspelling former President Ronald Reagan’s name, the glossary did not cite sources to help teachers and others understand what its definitions were based on.

Directors from DPI’s standards, curriculum and instruction division are now working with State Superintendent Catherine Truitt to revise the glossary, rewriting some definitions and including a more extensive list of citations.

Also sidelined were what’s known as “unpacking documents,” which outline learning objectives at each grade level, give an overview of what students should understand and provide examples of topics that relate to each objective. State DPI staff presented draft unpacking documents for kindergarten through fifth grade earlier this month. The state board is scheduled to review documents for grades 6-8 and for high school courses in July.

At the end of its June 3 meeting, the state board planned to reconsider those materials no later than June 18. But a bill now moving through the state legislature might give the state and local districts more time to streamline their curriculum.

Earlier this week the N.C. House of Representatives passed a COVID-19 relief bill that includes a one-year delay in the implementation of the new standards. That rewritten bill will be back in front of the state Senate this week.

But regardless of the outcome of that legislation, this week some members of the Moore County Board of Education were ready to halt the district’s work on any changes to its social studies curriculum.

During the board’s work session on Monday, board member David Hensley went so far as to accuse state education officials of “plagiarizing” the proposed glossary from politically biased sources and said the district should hold off on developing any curriculum based on the new standards.

“It’s going to delay us getting the unpacking documents, and I’m not sure that we’re going to have time to develop a social studies curriculum if we don’t receive the unpacking documents in a timely manner,” Hensley said.

“I’m not sure why we even have people working. We should delay them working.”

DPI officials told the State Board of Education that most of those definitions don’t have a single source, and were developed entirely in-house. But there are a few exceptions.

Much of the proposed glossary’s definition for “racism” is consistent with widely-used language originating in a “race equity and inclusion action guide” published in 2014 by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Similarly, the definition for “equity” draws heavily from a 2019 publication from the Center for the Study of Social Policy.

Monday’s school board agenda includes an update on Moore County Schools’ planning around the new social studies standards and goals for the district’s summer curriculum workshop.

Board member Robert Levy also expressed reservations about some of the state’s proposed supporting documents.

“I can see a request to delay based at least upon the unpacking documents that I’ve seen so far,” said Levy.

Last month Levy was the sole board member who did not vote to endorse teachers’ summer work to incorporate the new standards into their classroom plans. Levy abstained from that vote rather than opposing it.

After viewing the proposed K-5 unpacking documents presented to the State Board of Education earlier this month, Levy said some of the guidelines appear to be politically motivated.

Levy took issue with the inclusion of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor on a list of 18 “historical people” who could be taught in first grade, along with the objective “Explain how the experiences and achievements of people throughout history have helped contribute to the changes in various local communities and communities around the world over time.”

That list does not include Sandra Day O’Connor, the first female Supreme Court justice, but includes Thomas Jefferson, Martin Luther King, Sacagawea and Condoleezza Rice.

Levy also objected to the suggestion that the Rev. Dr. William Barber, formerly president of the North Carolina NAACP, be taught in third grade in connection with the objective: “Explain how the experiences and achievements of women, indigenous, religious and racial groups have contributed to the development of the local community.

“(Barber) is certainly a great man, and does a lot of interesting work, but he’s extremely, extremely, extremely political and is current and is not an historical figure,” said Levy. “At every place that you turn, this becomes a political document and I hope we’re going to have an educational document when we finally take care of this.”

But much of what’s in the unpacking documents serve as guidelines for teachers rather than hard-and-fast rules for what must be taught. Those decisions will be made at the district level and by teachers themselves.

“What our teachers need to be able to do, if nothing else, they need to be able to sort this out. They’re not waiting for you all to make their decisions for them. They’re the ones who are going to write the curriculum,” said Superintendent Bob Grimesey.

“You can provide guidance, but they’re not looking for you to come and dictate the curriculum that they’re going to teach. This is a very complicated situation and if this week they just take this video and watch it, it informs them of your concerns and your perspectives. They’re not ignorant of that and they’re not trying to look for a way to get around you. They are concerned about what you’re concerned about.”

The district brings in small groups of teachers to refine curriculum every summer — even when the state isn’t changing its standards. Grimesey maintained that teachers have enough information as it stands to start planning for the upcoming school year.

“I just simply wanted our teachers to be paid to be able to come in, look at the situation we have at hand with social studies given what they’ve learned from the past year, which is the kind of work we do anyhow, and bring as much perspective to that for them and their colleagues in the coming year as they possibly can under these unusual circumstances,” he said.

“The state has not made that easy, and the whole dynamics of politics in America have not made that easy. I think we owe it to them to let them … come in and see what they have on hand and talk to each other about what they’re going to need between now and the end of the year.”

The Moore County Board of Education’s regular meeting will be held on Monday at the district’s central office in Carthage. The board is scheduled to meet in closed session at 4 p.m. before the 6:30 p.m. open session.

(9) comments

Stephen Woodward

The headline misinforms before readers make it to the story's first sentence. The imposition on county schools by the State Board of Education is no so-called "refinement of social studies curriculum". It is a sledgehammer. It is a an overt attempt to hijack our public classrooms and transform them into indoctrination labs, where every aspect of America's heritage and every leader who has risen up in the struggle to achieve and sustain independence is diminished by a permanent dark cloud of "systemic/institutionalized racism". There is so much daylight out there exposing the actual tenants of "revised history standards" that many states with strong governors have banned them altogether. From whence does Moore County Schools stenographer Murphy derive her conclusion that the state's "standards" are merely an attempt to "more actively incorporate the contributions and experiences of women and minorities throughout history"? I suggest she read the proposed rule currently under review by the U.S. Department of Education. The "guidance" contained in it is tied to how federal education grants would be issued to the states. In other words, it's not merely a proposed rule, it is a ransom note. The language includes the requirement that history curricula “take into account systemic marginalization, biases, inequities, and discriminatory policy and practice in American history.”

Hysterically, Murphy reports that the desire of some Moore school board members to delay the review of the state standards stems from concern about a "(curriculum) glossary presented to the state board (that) was a draft that had not been fully edited". In fact, school board member David Hensley and a reporter for the Locke Foundation's Locker Room blog independently verified that that so-called glossary was comprised of definitions lifted directly from Wikipedia and it's numerous, radical left wing sources. He did not accuse the state's curriculum staffers of "plagiarism"; he and others have proven it. If the glossary created to support curricula is fundamentally based on radical ideology and rooted in the assumption that America's story is merely a tale of oppressors dominating the oppressed, then who can take comfort in the assurance made by Superintendent Bob Grimesey that Moore teachers "(are) the ones who are going to write the curriculum"? Oh, by the way, the Biden administration and the U.S. Department of Education will beg to differ on that assertion.

Linda Adams

Exactly. Schools are indoctrinating our youth to hate this country and divide students into oppressors and oppressed which manifests in division, hatred and inhibits each student from reaching their full potential. Politics should not be in a classroom!

Sally Larson

Why does Robert Levey think he knows everything? It takes more than one person to make good decisions and Levey is more political than anyone on the board.

Stephen Woodward

Mr. Levy knows how to correctly spell his surname which is more than can be said of Ms. Larson. He also know more about American history than any sitting board member, hands down. He knows that excluding Justice O’Connor is about her heritage as a white woman appointed by Ronald Reagan, a white Republican President. He knows a hijacking of history curricula when he sees it. As do many in our community. You will hear from us on Monday.

Sally Larson

Get over yourself.

Matthew Hintz

Sally you make me laugh.

Matthew Hintz

Amen Mr. Woodward, Amen

Matthew Hintz

Sally. You are too funny.

David Hensley

“Didn’t cite sources”?

You mean plagiarized word for word from Wikipedia. In turn, Wikipedia cited slate.com

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

The Pilot

Get unlimited digital access and support award-winning local journalism, for just $5 a month. This includes access to the electronic replica edition of The Pilot.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Already have a Print Subscription? Get Digital Access Free.

The Pilot

As a print subscriber, you also have unlimited digital access. Connect your account now. Or, call customer service at 910-693-2487 for help.

 

Our system has been updated, if you are a current print subscriber and cannot obtain your unlimited access, please contact customer support 910-693-2490. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Home Delivery

The Pilot

Our best deal: Get all the news of Moore County delivered to your home each Wednesday and Sunday — and receive unlimited digital access to thepilot.com.

Starting at
$27.82 for 90 days