Village of Pinehurst logo

Pinehurst, known far and wide for its tightly controlled appearance standards when it comes to homes, is about to loosen up, and not willingly.

Newly enacted state legislation making it clear that towns and counties cannot regulate such things as the color of new single-family homes means it could be perfectly legal for someone to build a purple house in Pinehurst.

Planning Director Kevin Reed told the Village Council last week that "in a nutshell, not to exaggerate," someone could do just that. He clarified later in the meeting that since he took over as planning director last July, no one has asked for something that outlandish.

The legislation, now awaiting the governor's signature, clarifies existing state law that prohibits towns and counties from regulating the design and other aesthetic controls for new single-family homes, including ordinances already on the books.

Pinehurst and Whispering Pines are among the municipalities in the area that have such standards for single-family homes in general.

The new bill, expected to garner the governor’s signature and become law, makes an exception for historic districts. Towns can continue to regulate the design and appearance of homes in locally established districts as well as those designated on the National Register of Historic Places and National Historic Landmarks.

That covers a large area of Pinehurst’s village center. But new homes in what are called “infill areas” would not be subject to design regulations.

Reed said private gated communities that have architectural review boards, such as Pinewild Country Club, and existing subdivisions that have their own restrictive covenants are also exempt and can continue to enforce their standards. He said a developer of a new subdivision would also be able to propose his own architectural standards, but the village cannot require them.

The current Pinehurst Development Ordinance (PDO) has a palette of acceptable colors for the exterior of homes, doors and trim. Last year, Reed said, a homeowner who had repainted a home bright yellow agreed to "tone down" the color after being told by the village that the original paint was "slightly too bright."

The PDO also includes regulations on such things as siding, roof type and other materials.

"We would lose the ability to essentially regulate any type of design standard relative to color, placement of windows and doors, that sort of thing," Reed told the council.

The village can still regulate such things as the size of the home, the height and setbacks.

Interim Manager Jeff Batton told the council that it will have to approve amendments to the PDO to remove the regulations and standards that are now prohibited by the state.

Reed said the staff will go through the PDO to find all of the language and regulation that must be deleted in preparing an amendment for the council's approval. In the meantime, the village will no longer be able to enforce those standards once it becomes law, he added.

The state House gave final approval to the legislation Tuesday, the same day of the council meeting. It passed on a 98-17 vote after already winning approval in the Senate. It was sent to Gov. Pat McCrory Thursday. If he does not sign it within 10 days, June 21, it becomes law.

State Rep. Jamie Boles, whose district includes most of the county, voted for the bill. He said the state has a building code that all local governments must follow that include basic standards.

"Towns have taken it a step further regulating the aesthetics and other things," Boles said. "It increases the cost to consumers. At what point does local government overstep the N.C. building code? It is not only here (Moore County), it is statewide."

Local home builder Densel Williams, a board member of the N.C. Home Builders Association, which lobbied for the legislation, agreed with Boles that the state building code should suffice.

"Over the years it has been pushed out and pushed out," Williams said of towns interpreting what they think it allows them to regulate. "Some push way beyond what the the state building code says, what common sense says."

He said attorneys for some towns have advised them to continue with these regulations until they get sued, arguing that it is a "gray area" in the law.

"That led to this legislation," Williams said. "It is costly to citizens. You don't have this legal authority to do this. You take away the citizens' right, the architects' right to design what they think is appealing, what will sell. This gives the citizens the power back to build what they want to build as long as it meets the state building code. I think common sense will prevail. I don't think municipalities will find that this legislation will hurt them."

Williams said it may actually be a good thing so that all new development will not look the same.

Four of the five council members seem resigned to the fact that the battle was lost and that it would be pointless to fight it.

"That ship has sailed," Mayor Nancy Fiorillo said.

But that did not sit well with John Strickland, who was adamant that the village should have gone on record much earlier by letting state Rep. Jamie Boles, who voted in favor of the legislation, and leaders at the N.C. General Assembly know that the village wants "to be able to retain our standards as much as possible." He said other towns had expressed opposition and that the village should still make its feelings known to the General Assembly.

"The village of Pinehurst has had a wonderful architectural heritage for a hundred-some years," he said. "I think we need to go on record trying to defend that even in the face of losing the current battle in the legislature. But it seems to me that we owe ourselves, our history, we owe our current residents who have moved here with a certain expectation of what the architectural standards and the color standard of the village would be, to at least go on record as trying to support what we have."

Council member Clark Campbell responded, "It's interesting you mention our history because the first 100 years of that history, we didn't have any standards. We celebrate our Old Town and that is because the free market did it the way they did it."

"There weren't a lot of purple paints in those days either," Strickland replied.

Campbell pointed out that neighboring Southern Pines does not impose design standards on new single-family homes.

"How many purple houses are in Southern Pines?" he asked.

Strickland said the village needs to do everything possible to maintain its standards.

"I think we have a standard that our residents expect us as a council to try to defend," he said. "We should at least go on record, even in defeat in trying to defend that history."

Fiorillo said the village and individual members did share their concerns with the N.C. League of Municipalities, which lobbies on their behalf.

"I like to rely on the league and the league made, I think, a very good attempt at compromise, and it failed," she said.

"I don't know what good it would do to go on record now."

Claire Phillips agreed, saying, "It's done."

The proposed compromise called for allowing towns to continue imposing design regulations on existing undeveloped lots in infill areas. It was rejected by a House committee.

Fiorillo also agreed with Campbell that the legislation is just a clarification of what is allowed by the state.

"Being creatures of the state, we're only allowed to do what the state allows us to do," she said. "We will still have the controls in our historic district. We certainly hope any infill development would be sensitive to what development is already there. And if the new subdivisions, if they want to have covenants, they can certainly do that."

But Strickland said state legislators "need to understand there are at least some of us out here who do believe in certain standards and want to protect residential areas."

In response to a question from Fiorillo, Village Attorney Mike Newman concurred that the legislation simply clarifies existing law.

"It couldn't be any clearer," Campbell said. "It clarified a law that has been in place a long time. So this isn't something new. Again, you wouldn't have what we have in our historic district, the real historic center of our town with today's PDO. You wouldn't be able to build what is there."

Whispering Pines Mayor Bob Zschoche said this week that should the legislation be signed into law, he would ask the village attorney to prepare an analysis for the council to discuss. He said the council has not taken a position on it.

"As a general statement, I am not generally pleased the General Assembly would take away any local authority and autonomy," he said. "I understand why they are doing it. I don't like it. Some (towns) have abused their local privilege."

Zschoche said the latest version of the bill is an improvement over the initial proposal last year in that it allows subdivisions with private restrictive covenants to retain them through their homeowners' associations.

"We've got a bunch of new subdivisions with homeowners' association covenants ," he said, noting that this will apply to new homes on infill lots.

"Will it be the end of life as we know it?" he asked. "Probably not. I would prefer to retain that authority."

(4) comments

Chris Williams

Not sure where rightfield gets the idea that only a "few" use the greenway system in Pinehurst. Any time I am on it it is packed with people walking dogs, cycling, and jogging. Looks like once again we have an elderly Village resident that thinks the only citizens the Village should cater to is the old wealthy retired set that only want to lunch with the ladies and play golf. The demographics in the Village are slowly changing to include younger and younger residents and that old guard is just fighting it as hard as they can. Plus the streetlights are a matter of public safety that benefits us all, unless of course you already live in a gated community or in ritzy village center and are "above" contact with the riff-raff.

Richard Wright

Mr. Campbell - Who cares that Southern Pines has no purple houses, we (and you) live in Pinehurst? And why would the Mayor use the League to convey the village's concern rather than call Mr. Boles? Is Mr. Strickland the only council member who cares about the VOP? Zoning laws protect most taxpayer's greatest investment. Instead the VOP council focuses on sidewalks, bike paths and street lights, none which will enhance the quality of life for most citizens in Pinehurst. Instead, the majority will subsidize lights and sidewalks for a few. Thank about it. The sidewalks will be from where to what? I propose another $50K study.

Chris Williams

Great points Skippy! One thing that always has amazed me is how many people will move to a town or area and not bother to research the regulations or standards that are already in place. If you find a place to live based partially on that you will be happier in the long run. Very simple, find the location that matches the type of restrictions or lack thereof that you will mesh well with. Want unlimited freedom to build and modify your property as you wish? Buy acreage in the country. Like an established neighborhood with standards for the type of homes and yards? Buy a home or lot in the Village. Above all remember that the best way to be a good neighbor is to be considerate to those around you and follow the rules for the area of your choosing. So many people are so wrapped up in the mindset of "I can do anything that I want" that they immediately discard the thought of how their actions impact those who live closest to them. Find where others with the same mindset as you are and move in. You (and those around you) will be much happier.

Peter Mulcahy

I have lived in areas in this country where Saudi princes have built vacation houses and decorated them with the most (I'm sorry, I'm about to express an opinion based on an American perspective of what is considered attractive in 99% of American neighborhoods) tacky, gaudy statuary that immediately begin to negatively affect the local property values. I have also lived in a registered Historic District that required permission to paint your house purple and that permission was never given. After living there 25 years, the end result of those zoning restrictions was a triple rise in what my home would have been worth on the existing market. Finally, long ago, after I bought my first house, in what would prove to be a wonderful area, I watched my neighbor across the street build a cinder block memorial to the late JFK. It was lit continuously with Christmas lights and was a re-creation of Michelangelo’s "Pieta" with the head of JFK instead of the head of Jesus. I put my house up for sale a month later and swore I would never live in an area that didn't have zoning laws. The moral of all this is that many people think the government should get out of their lives but, believe me, when it comes to having your neighbor build a memorial to whomever next to you ...the government has got it just right. Pinehurst has to protect their homeowners.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

Get unlimited digital access and support award-winning local journalism, for just $5 a month. This includes access to the electronic replica edition of The Pilot.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Already a Print Subscriber? Get Digital Access Free.

As a print subscriber, you also have unlimited digital access. Connect your account now. Or, call customer service at 910-693-2487 for help.

Free access for current print subscribers

Home Delivery

Our best deal: Get all the news of Moore County delivered to your home each Wednesday and Sunday — and receive unlimited digital access to

Starting at
$27.82 for 90 days