Robert Levy

A proposed policy change that would restrict school athletic teams and gender-segregated facilities like bathrooms and locker rooms to students with the corresponding reproductive organs failed to find support with two of the Moore County Board of Education’s three policy committee members on Thursday.

So did new policies — proposed by committee chair Robert Levy — delaying new North Carolina social studies standards some believe to be influenced by what’s known as Critical Race Theory. Levy’s proposed changes also called for renouncing that school of thought and any potential curriculum based on it.

Those debates are not over, though. They will soon move to the full board without the endorsement of the full committee. Libby Carter and Ed Dennison, the other two policy committee members, said that they won’t support the changes.

Thursday’s committee meeting began with an hour spent behind closed doors receiving confidential legal advice. The committee agreed to some policy changes that clarify the procedure for adding agenda items to upcoming meetings and allow for public comment via telephone. Those will move to the full board for approval.

‘Colorblind institution’

But the bulk of the two-and-a-half hour open session dealt with the controversial matters. The first was a proposed addition to the board’s existing discrimination and harassment policies. It would prohibit preferential treatment of students and staff who are racial minorities or in another legally protected class.

“It also seeks to get rid of the whole idea that you can discriminate so long as you discriminate against a person of a majority race or a majority ethnicity or a majority group,” Levy said.

The board’s existing policies specifically prohibit unreasonable or unfavorable treatment of any individual based on race, color, national origin, religion or disability.

“This actually is adequately covered in the paragraph that’s already in here, that we are not going to discriminate intentionally or unintentionally, based on any one of those categories,” Carter said. “I think it opens a divide among the equity of treatment when we begin to dig into it this way.”

Dennison brought up federally designated Title I schools that receive additional funding according to the population of students from low-income families enrolled there. Levy said that the policy’s definition of discrimination is based on legal designations that don’t include socioeconomic background.

“What we’re trying to do is we’re trying to create a meritocracy, and in creating a meritocracy rather than a free pass based upon the color of your skin or our ethnicity, then we need to give our economically disadvantaged students the extra help that they certainly need,” said Levy.

“It was rather obvious that there is certainly a split between certain board members, and I was not likely to get this passed through this committee today, but that does not mean that I’m not going to still push it because I feel extremely strongly about making sure that when we deal as a school we do not deal with things such as we do not promote critical race theory or we do not discriminate in any way and we are a colorblind educational institution,” Levy said, restating the word “colorblind” twice.

Curriculum backlash

Race — and how public schools’ social studies classes deal with racism throughout the nation’s history — has already become an incendiary topic in education throughout the state.

In February, the State Board of Education approved new social studies standards aimed at incorporating the experiences of minorities and marginalized groups as well as their perspectives on government, economic systems and historic events. The new standards are timed along with a realignment of high school history and civics courses, but apply from kindergarten up.

The state Department of Public Instruction is in the process of developing a full curriculum based on the new standards. The Moore County Board of Education is scheduled to conduct a more thorough review of the standards and how they’ll actually be taught in classrooms during its May work session.

The full school board, during its meeting last Monday, heard from eight speakers alarmed by the new standards and their perceived connection to Critical Race Theory. Those speakers included members of the Moore County Republican Women, who bestowed upon each board member and Superintendent Bob Grimesey more than 100 typed letters in support of their position.

An impassioned speech from Pauline Bruno, president of the Republican women’s group, prompted a standing ovation from most of the room, including Levy and board members David Hensley and Philip Holmes.

“My concern is that our schoolchildren are not sufficiently mature to be able to understand the difference between critical race theory that is creating division rather than prompting friendship,” said Kay Wildt.

“Highlighting privilege, labeling people as oppressors or oppressed in curriculum sends the wrong message that is destructive to mental health and to children’s self esteem. I urge Moore County Schools to reject Critical Race Theory and its hurtful teaching.”

Another two speakers voiced support for the new standards and a new approach to how racism is addressed in history classes.

Levy plans to bring the proposed policy which would prohibit any curriculum based on Critical Race Theory before the full board.

The policy would provide for discussion of that theory at the appropriate age and education level. Critical Race Theory posits that race is an artificial social construct with no basis in human biology, and that at the same time it is intertwined in American institutions resulting in continued exploitation and oppression of minorities.

“I don’t want Critical Race Theory taught without context in our schools,” said Levy.

“When you’re teaching Critical Race Theory — that race is used by white people to further their economic and political interest at the expense of people of color — you’re teaching racism and that is wrong.”

‘Ridiculous Stuff’

But committee members agreed to postpone further discussion of the new social studies standards until after the full board’s review next month.

Carter’s primary objection to the policy as proposed was a matter of appropriateness and precedent. She said that such a policy is tantamount to micromanaging teachers and sets the stage for further policies on the teaching of other contentious topics, like evolution.

“Do I agree with Critical Race Theory? I’m not going there, I’m not touching that right now,” she said. “That’s not the part of it that I think is of concern. I think the concern is, ‘is this something that belongs in our policy manual,’ and I’m not sure that it does.”

She did agree that, although the new state standards don’t explicitly mention Critical Race Theory or its tenets, “they came close.”

“They’re never going to say this is based on critical race theory, but when you look at the standards and the standards basically teach children that they are part of a group — not that they are part of the United States of America but they are part of a particular racial or ethnic group — that is tribalism,” said Levy. “Tribalism is the basis of discord throughout world history.”

The school board has no other policy either forbidding or mandating a specific topic or curriculum.

“It feels really strange to have a policy on a theory,” said Dennison.

“Evolution — certainly that is something that was dealt with a long, long time ago but you can’t say if you’re for it or against it, you’re un-American,” Levy replied. “Racism is un-American.”

Dennison also suggested that some of the reaction to the new social studies standards may be overwrought and said he read some of the statements in the 133 letters he received from the Republican women’s group on Monday with incredulity.

“White students taught that white skin automatically means you’re a racist, they’re being taught their color is evil, they’re thinking that they are oppressors? All these things I’m sure are not going on in our schools,” he said.

“Our children in grade school being taught that if they were born white, they’re evil? I mean, ridiculous stuff.”

Dennison said he won’t make a decision on how Moore County Schools should handle the new social studies standards until he understands it beyond the encyclopedia definition of Critical Race Theory that Levy offered, and the full curriculum comes down from the state.

At this point it’s unclear whether the board has the option to opt out or delay implementation of those standards.

“I think we need to know what it is. Screw the definition, let’s see what’s expected of us with this,” said Dennison. “People are jumping all over the place — ‘it’s Critical Race Theory!’ — and I still don’t know what we’re supposed to be doing if we were to even implement this program.”

Transgender Policy Disputed

Dennison and Carter also flatly declined to support adding a localized version of North Carolina’s infamous and long since repealed “bathroom bill” to the board’s existing Title IX policy prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex.

Levy presented the policy as a way to protect the privacy of cisgender children who would be embarrassed to share a bathroom or locker room with a child of the other biological sex.

“I deeply and truly believe that children should not be part of social experimentation and that it is proper, when dealing with children, to give them their private spaces,” said Levy.

The proposed policy establishes the sex listed on a student’s birth certificate as the determinant of which spaces they’re permitted to use. But it also directs the superintendent to “consult with an appropriate medical authority to make the appropriate determination” in cases that are not easily resolved.

During the discussion, Levy said that the approach does not constitute discrimination against transgender students, who he also referred to as “gender dysphoric” and “transsexual.”

“What we are saying to them is that you are biologically a certain way and therefore you are going to have to … go into either a male’s personal space or a female’s personal space based upon that biological gender,” he said.

“We do have to deal with all students and one of the problems is we are sacrificing the privacy of the vast majority in order to accommodate the political will of the extreme minority.”

Dennison responded to the proposal as a solution in search of a problem. As proposed, the policy would allow for school administrators to designate a “third personal space,” which is more or less how the issue is handled as it is.

“I know that we have several of these children in our schools and I know the principals are taking care of it,” he said. “I’m not aware of any problems, and as far as I know the men aren’t going into girls’ bathrooms. Principals are making accommodations for those students.”

Carter anticipated legal challenges to any such policy, and shied away from bringing any authority over individual students’ sex or gender under the school board’s purview.

“The idea that we would have our superintendent consult with a medical authority and invade a child’s life and the life of the family to determine their identification is stepping way beyond all bounds that I feel like our school system needs to encounter,” she said.

“Our goal is to support every student, not single out one who is already having critical issues within his or her life, to be able to allow the comfort of a safe, secure situation in their school and I think this is a step towards singling them out and persecuting them rather than providing them with support.”

The committee also agreed to temporarily set aside proposed amendments to the board’s academic freedom policy that would prohibit teachers from advocating for any political candidate, party or point of view within the classroom setting.

All three members supported the idea but plan to review and consider an existing N.C. School Boards Association policy dealing with employees’ political activities.

“I think we all agree, said Carter, “that none of us support a teacher trying to force-feed from a position of authority.”

(15) comments

Matthew Hintz

The truth. People are being conditioned to hate whites, males, christians, conservatives, libertarians, combat veterans. Those demographics are being categorized as "Right Wing Extremists" just for standing up for and defending our Constitution using our first amendment rights, that we swore an oath to defend. Even against "domestic enemies." Defend it with our first amendment rights, we must and we will. Stop demonizing us, and hear us too. You can't force or control people to believe, what you believe. You can only influence. Influence is leadership. Control and force is not leadership. It is dictatorship. Let us all chill out and have a dignified, respectful, objective, and fact filled debate. Stop the subjective slander, name calling, and fear filled hatred.

Dusty Rhoades

So, according to the story, no one is suggesting that Critical Race Theory be taught in our schools, yet the school board is making a big fuss over not teaching Critical Race Theory in our schools. Once again, radical right wingers are loudly pushing a solution without a problem.

Stephen Woodward

Wrong. The State Board of Education voted 7-5 to adopt standards that embrace Critical Race "Theory". It's more than a suggestion. It is on the verge of being mandated unless our legislators can stop it dead in its tracks.

Dusty Rhoades

Red the story, Stephen. "She did agree that, although the new state standards don’t explicitly mention Critical Race Theory or its tenets, “they came close.”"

Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. This is a made up crisis.

Dusty Rhoades

Here's what the SBE voted for. Find me anything that mentions "Critical Race Theory."

David StClair

I was going to post a long comment on this, but Sally and Stephan covered it very intelligently. As to Kent's typically narrow minded and simplistic comment on transgender issues, anyone who has done research and reading on them understands that they are a whole lot more complex than just who has a Y chromosome.

Sally Larson

Adults don't give children enough credit, they understand a lot more than you think especially when it comes to discrimination. Unfortunately, children reflect what they've learned at home and bring it to school perpetuating the ongoing divide. I can understand why the adults in the room are uncomfortable with these changes because it forces everyone to face their own truths about their beliefs, but if we're going to move forward in societal acceptance we must face the hard things.

I’ve had conversations here about hate for immigrants because they are taking American jobs. How is that letting the best and hardest workers get the job if they happen to be Mexican? I agree people should be judged by their accomplishments but how hard does it have to be when there are so many preconceived hurdles to climb to get there? Everyone has an attitude or an inbred belief about Women, Mexicans, Asians, Blacks, Transgenders. How are we going to teach children to overcome these things and see the value of the individual without bringing it to the forefront?

School is the place to begin the change. Hate and prejudice are learned, school is the best place to learn something new. If the Board is too afraid to adopt such an obvious change, then maybe the first step would be to redesign the classroom model by putting together students in groups who have to learn to work together to accomplish tasks thereby overcoming their preconceived ideas of each other. Change the groups up every week so all the children learn how to get along with each other. Prejudice is nothing more than a lack of information, putting together students who are unfamiliar with each other can make lifelong impressions of who we all are.

Stephen Woodward

Ms. Carter seems to present a circular argument. We dare not micromanage teachers and, yet, we surely can’t have them “force-feeding from a position of authority.” Both she and Mr. Dennison chose to shy away from getting into the weeds on curricula that would distort American history and exceptionalism, preferring to wait on guidance from the all knowing state Board of Education. If you’re a member of our school board and you have not figured out the end game regarding “social studies”, I suggest a homework assignment. There is ample reading on the topic. And just by the way, the state board voted 7-5 to adopt standards that will impose on teachers and students a narrative casting the founding of our country and advancement of freedom as rooted in and driven by deeply rooted racism. The state board’s position is clear. So let’s not sit still in Moore County. If our local board won’t stand up to denounce Critical Race Theory, parents and citizens certainly will.

Justin Bradford

Steve, this is so hypocritical of you to mention distortion of American History, as you are still part of the big lie, the insurrection, and spreading of false information about masks. I have read very thoroughly, and multiple times, the proposed social studies, and it very simply does NOT state the lies you are spreading. You’re continued rhetoric is full of ignorant, hateful, fear inducing lies. Shame on you.

Katie Bradford

Justin Bradford

Please excuse the typo/autocorrect on my phone. I realize it is your and not you’re. I regret the error.

Katie Bradford

Dusty Rhoades

So, are you suggesting we teach about the Constitution without reference to Article One, sections 2 and 9 ? Not to mention Article Four, Section 2?

Dusty Rhoades

Transgender kids and so called "Critical Race Theory"--looks like the MAGAts have found new squirrels they demand everyone chase to distract us from the real problems the country needs to deal with.

Mark Hayes

Which one should we start with ?

Kent Misegades

Men and boys have a Y chromosome. Women and girls don’t. God determines this at conception. End of discussion. The far left curricula creeping into government schools is one of the chief reasons its enrollment is dropping and home, charter and private schools are booming.

Ed Dennison

Kent, I have a Bachelor's Degree in Biology.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Comments that violate any of the rules above are subject to removal by staff.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading. Subscribe today and support local community journalism.

Digital Only Subscriptions

The Pilot

Get unlimited digital access and support award-winning local journalism, for just $5 a month. This includes access to the electronic replica edition of The Pilot.

Starting at
$5.35 for 30 days

Already have a Print Subscription? Get Digital Access Free.

The Pilot

As a print subscriber, you also have unlimited digital access. Connect your account now. Or, call customer service at 910-693-2487 for help.


Our system has been updated, if you are a current print subscriber and cannot obtain your unlimited access, please contact customer support 910-693-2490. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Home Delivery

The Pilot

Our best deal: Get all the news of Moore County delivered to your home each Wednesday and Sunday — and receive unlimited digital access to

Starting at
$27.82 for 90 days