State Insurance Commis-sioner Wayne Goodwin has ordered that a hearing be held on a request by insurance companies to raise homeowners insurance rates, saying the proposed rates appear to be excessive and unfairly discriminatory.

The insurance companies, represented by the North Carolina Rate Bureau, have requested an overall state-wide average increase of 17.7 percent for homeowners insurance rates.

The hearing, which is open to the public, will be held at 10 a.m. June 3, 2013, at 430 N. Salisbury St. in Raleigh.

Goodwin will serve as the hearing officer and listen to experts from the Depart-ment of Insurance and the Rate Bureau to decide what rate changes, if any, are warranted.

The Department of Insur-ance's role is to represent the interests of the public. After an initial review of the filing and comments submitted by the public, department experts believe the requested rate increases are not justified based on the data submitted, a news release said. The following concerns, among others, may be raised at the hearing, according to the news release:

n Old data: In the rate-making process, data typically runs two years behind the date of the rate filing. The filing is based on data from 2005 to 2009. However, data from at least as recently as 2010 was available at the time this filing was compiled.

n Risk factors: The filing includes various risk factors used to calculate the indicated rate changes. The Rate Bureau claims these factors (such as the net cost of reinsurance and compensation for assessment risk) are a necessary cost of doing business in North Carolina. The concern is that the factors do not appear to be justified and result in a substantial increase in rates.

n Profit methodology: The Rate Bureau uses a methodology that is not allowed in North Carolina and has been successfully challenged in the 2001 auto insurance case, which was decided by the N.C. Supreme Court. This methodology results in excessive profit factors of 10.5 percent.

n Deviations: The Rate Bureau includes a factor for deviations (discounts that some insurers give some of their policyholders) in the filing that, in effect, charges discounts back to consumers. The inclusion of a specific factor for deviations has been previously disallowed numerous times in auto filings litigated in the N.C. Supreme Court.

n Hurricane model: The hurricane losses are derived using a hurricane model that does not appear to be adequately documented or justified.

A public comment period on the rate filing was held Oct.3-19. The Department of Insurance received 8,800 emailed or mailed comments, and 35 people made comments in person during a public comment session held on Oct. 17, the news release said.

The filing is available for public review on the Department's website. To view the entire filing, go to http://pserff.ncdoi.net/pc.html and enter the Serff Tracking Number NCRI-128708881.

During Goodwin's administration, there have been no approved homeowners insurance rate increases.

The last homeowners insurance rate filing occurred in 2008, when the insurance companies requested a 19.5 percent statewide average increase. A settlement agreement allowed for a 4.05 percent statewide average increase to go into effect in May 2009.