About That Trillion-Dollar Coin

Advertisement

So the trillion dollar coin is now kaput. I thought those guys were for real, or at least pretending to be. Paul Krugman, poster-economist for the fringe left, wrote superficially serious commentary, and Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) seemed to like the idea. People you never heard of were suddenly big fans.

But the White House has seemingly put it all to rest.

In case you somehow missed all the fun, the concept was for the Treasury (that's the United States Treasury, not Zimbabwe's) to mint a $1 trillion platinum coin and deposit it at the Fed, which keeps an operating checking account for the U.S. government, which could then just spend the money.

This would neatly bypass Congress and the need to raise the debt ceiling.

Of course, fiat currency is nothing new. That's what we have now; the difference is that Congress has to create it rather than the Treasury Department. I suppose the case can be made for bypassing the middleman; there has certainly been little effort at controlling cash creation for the past 50 years.

Still, it does seem a little too easy.

There is a statute in place empowering the Treasury to mint platinum currency in any denomination. It was intended to permit the minting of ceremonial coins for the government to sell us. Evidently the Franklin Mint was raking in all the profits from overpriced metal. It's sort of like the post office selling all those special edition unmailed stamps to collectors. It's good for profit margins.

The statute does not specify how much platinum should be in such a coin. That's a good thing, because a coin actually containing a trillion dollars' worth of platinum would weigh around 900,000 pounds.

Instead, the Treasury could just plate a little platinum on a nickel and call it a trillion. If it weren't for the statute, it could stamp it out of plastic or scribble Jack Lew's signature on a Post-It note. The value would be essentially the same.

There were some folks out there making the case that this would be legal.

It seems to be one of those things not mentioned in the Constitution. It is probably legal in Zimbabwe.

Here's the thing: If you're going to do it, you might as well do it right. Mint up a $16 trillion dollar coin and pay off the national debt.

Or, better yet, make it $100 trillion, and get us into next year.

Can't you picture an assistant secretary of something-or-other from the Treasury Department strolling over to the Fed with a trillion dollar coin in hand?

"Ummm ... Mr. Bernanke, sir, I have that coin for you."

"Oh. Thanks. Just put it here on my desk. It'll make a nice paperweight."

Suddenly the Fed Chairman is seized by a desire for a Starbuck's triple-half-decaf-mocha-latte. He has left his wallet at home. He picks up the paperweight and heads out for coffee.

"Here you are sir, that will be $9.75."

"I'm sorry, I don't have any change. Here's a trillion."

"I'm very sorry sir, but we can't change a trillion. Would you care for an extra hundred billion gallons of coffee to go?"

"No thanks. Excuse me, pal. May I borrow a 10-spot?"

So the chairman of the Federal Reserve is going to leave a 25-cent tip with borrowed money. That's Washington for you.

If we started coining these things, you can be pretty sure it would go on for a long time. One day the Fed chairman, or somebody else, would go for coffee, plunk down a trillion dollars and be told politely, "I'm sorry, sir, but that will be two trillion."

Fred Wolferman lives in Southern Pines. Contact him by email at fwolferman@ sbcglobal.net.

Advertisement

Comments

Yukonjohn 4 months ago

Fred, you are so right. The time would come, and come quickly where one would plop downa trillion dollar coin, and instead of change, they would be told, sorry, that is two trillion. It is bad enough already. When inflation strikes, and it has to, it is the only way to pay off the debt, we are all going to be in a fix. I am hoping that those of us that have a little money will have that money grow exponentially so we will be able to afford to live, but once again, the poor will suffer and suffer hard. That is something that gets me about people that are not conservatives....they proclaim to want to help the poor suffering masses, and yet, their plan will only make them suffer worse in the end!!

0

dustyrhoades 4 months ago

Can't you picture an assistant secretary of something-or-other from the Treasury Department strolling over to the Fed with a trillion dollar coin in hand?

This sounds strangely familiar....

Me, last week: For one thing, how does one “deposit” a trillion dollar coin? Does the Treasury secretary just stick it in his front pocket and walk it down to the Federal Reserve?

0

Thatcher 4 months ago

And remember, it was Paul Krugman who, before coming up with the "brilliant" trillion dollar coin idea, said we could solve unemployment in 18 months by preparing for an alien attack from outer space: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaED2E.... One poster here insisted that Krugman was only joking about the aliens, which Krugman clearly was not. So Krugman's trillion dollar coin idea is not suprising...it is one more in a bizzare array of his liberal economic ideas. Cheers!

0

dustyrhoades 4 months ago

Thatcher your track record of figuring out who's joking or being ironic here isn't what you'd call stellar.

0

fugitiveguy 4 months ago

Meanwhile the debt continues to spiral out of control, Obama has done nothing to address it in fact has made it much, much worse. The lemmings continue to lem. No concern of the end result. When it all implodes (and it will) they will blame Bush anyway.

0

Thatcher 4 months ago

Actually DR, I suspect most folks with any background in economics (or for that matter, just common sense) would view Krugman's $1 trillion coin idea as even more silly than his space alien defense idea. Yet you insist that he was joking about the latter, but agree that he was serious about the former. Quite interesting. Cheers!

0

dustyrhoades 4 months ago

I don't recall that I've ever commented on Krugman's space alien "idea.' Can you point to where I have? Considering your track record, I'm not taking your word on what you claim I've said, and neither should anyone else.

0

Thatcher 4 months ago

DR-- I originally posted Krugman's CNN space alien idea many months ago. You then posted something which you suggested showed that Krugman claimed he was joking. You and I went back and forth for many posts about whether he was joking or not. My point to you then was that he was not joking...anymore than he is now joking about his $1 trillion coin idea. And as Jon Stewart recently found out, don't make fun of Krugman's crazy ideas or Krugman will get angry and you will risk your status as a "good liberal": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAJa3w.... Too funny! Cheers!

0

LSM 4 months ago

@Thatcher...

And do not forget about Klugman's admitting "death panels" will help reduce the deficit on an ABC News roundtable no less.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/economist-paul-krugman-death-panels-will-save-money/

0
Comments No Longer Accepted
Pinestraw Magazine