A Welcome Caution On Fracking Rules

Advertisement

R esidents of northern Moore County - or at least those not hoping to make a quick and maybe dirty buck by leasing out the shale deposits under their property - should find encouragement in reports coming out of the N.C. Mining and Energy Commission.

Normally, updates on the activities of such a regulatory body might be of interest primarily to those looking for bedside reading matter to put them to sleep. But these reports should be of particular interest to those hoping to preserve the qualities that make our little corner of the world so special.

The Mining and Energy Commission - a body that deals with issues that fall under the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, which Pinehurst's John Skvarla was recently named to head - has been taking a close look at fracking. That's short for hydraulic fracturing, the practice of forcing chemical-laced water underground at great pressure as a means of extracting oil and natural gas that might not otherwise be accessible.

Among the Nation's Strictest?

Here's the good news, though only preliminary: Commission members, after a couple of days of meetings on the subject, are said to be coalescing around a set of fracking regulations that could be among the strictest in the nation in terms of things like water testing, wastewater disposal and disclosure of the chemicals involved.

If that were to prove true, it would be an especially pleasant surprise, coming at a time when so many attitudes emanating out of Raleigh more often seem to be of the doggedly pro-industry, anti-regulation variety.

This may be part of a general hardening of attitudes toward fracking. When it first burst on the scene not long ago, many viewed it as a godsend in terms of helping America achieve a quick and easy degree of energy independence. Attitudes in many quarters have grown more sober and realistic as some of the drawbacks and dangers of the practice have become clearer.

In the initial glow, for instance, experts were predicting that the Deep River Basin, which lies under northern Moore, contained a 40-year supply of gas at current use rates. But an assessment released last year by the U.S. Geological Survey said it was more like five years, raising new questions about whether the game was worth the candle.

Testing Would Be Expanded

Among other tightened controls, the board is apparently considering a requirement that a drilling company seeking to launch a fracking operation in a particular spot be required to first test every water source within 5,000 feet. That's nearly a mile - several times the distance required by most other states. Given average population density in northern Moore and southern Lee County, that could mean an average of a dozen well tests, at an average cost of $2,000 or so apiece.

This expanded radius seems reasonable, given the great horizontal distances that drillers can cover once they have reached the desired depths. The pre-drilling water samples would provide a good baseline against which to gauge any post-drilling environmental effects.

While fracking may hold out great promise in some situations, it also poses great dangers. In determining where and when it can take place in these parts, North Carolina needs to err on the side of prudence.

Advertisement

Comments

Walter_B_Bull_Jr 3 months, 2 weeks ago

The Editors objection to the natural gas recovery process known as fracking is duly noted.

The objections are mostly emotional and at odds with established industry practices. Natural gas is a remarkable fuel, easily compressed into liquid form a safely transported by pipeline. All of us can agree that shale gas reserves exist thru-out the world and that successful safe recovery is increasing in volume and provides a cost effective fossil fuel to power living around the globe. Pilot editorial favorite seems to be wind power, an unreliable process despite millions of dollars dedicated to the process by risk investors like T. Boone Pickens. The drawing included in your editorial would imply that a leak may invade ground water supplies but the attached cross section correctly shows a spacing between the horizontal underground pipe-more than a mile underground and surface water reservoirs used for irrigation and drinking. There is enough bad information floating around, but the Pilot editors would do well to read postings by Charlie Holbrook (http://voiceofmoorecounty.com/) who writes in plain English and debunks much of the folklore about the practice.

0

booty2tee 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Here's a bit of Charlie's bio at DENR: •1992-1996, Vice President for Exploration New Ventures for Caltex Pacific Indonesia in Jakarta •1964-1992, numerous assignments at Chevron Corporation in oil and natural gas exploration progressing in technical and managerial complexity both onshore Gulf Coast and offshore Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic basins.

Think he could be a bit biased per PRO FRACKING? Also, this fracking seems to be on the fast track, that's NOT good news. http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/01/29/2641730/lawmakers-to-speed-up-fracking.html

Sure, they may expand how far they test the waters before fracking is started but what good it that going to do after contamination has occurred? Reality is, these gas rigs are run by humans and know what, humans make mistakes and accidents happen, read up on it in Pa. and other states where many home/landowners are suffering from "accidents". VERY EXTENSIVE SETBACKS from rivers, streams, homes and wells, not to mention livestock needs to be seriously taken into consideration if they really want to see this fracking is done somewhat responsibly.

0

TF121 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Fracking in Moore County? No thanks. -- too little gas to extract -- too much gas already in market -- too sensitive an issue for a county in which agriculture and tourism play a huge role -- too much history of too little water supply -- too much mythology about local jobs creation and where the extracted gas actually goes

0
Comments No Longer Accepted
Pinestraw Magazine