Aberdeen Man Reflects on Convention Atmosphere
- Print print this page
- Discuss 6 comments, Blog about
Advertisement
Fresh from his experience as a state delegate at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, Aberdeen resident Maurice Holland Sr. called the experience a “positive, inspiring and memorable mountain-top moment.”
Holland says he has plenty of memories and plenty of work to do before the November election.
“I got to meet a lot of dignitaries,” he said. “I spent a lot of time handing out my (business) card, because there are people that you can call on their expertise in the future.
“It was like a concert or a championship game that has piqued your interest. It really was a once-in-a-lifetime experience.”
The longtime resident of the Midway community in Aberdeen said he will do his best to register voters and get them out to vote by providing them with information about the president’s agenda.
North Carolina is viewed by political observers as a key swing state in November.
Reflecting on the three-day convention, Holland called his trip to Charlotte for the DNC memorable.
“Politically, I have never met a more positive, foward-looking group of people,” Holland said.
He praised all of the speakers for staying on the message that President Obama inherited an economic “hole,” that he has made some significant accomplishments while in office, and where the country must go from here.
He said First Lady Michelle Obama’s speech Tuesday night was “off the hook,” and that former President Bill Clinton on Wednesday delivered “one of the best speeches he’s ever given.”
But both speeches were topped, Holland said, by President Obama when he spoke Thursday night after he formally accepted the party’s nomination.
“It was fantastic,” he said. “The program was out of sight, and the speakers were dynamite.”
Holland said the atmosphere in the arena was electric when President Obama took the stage.
“You couldn’t hear his speech for the cheering,” Holland said. “He had delegates and other attendees swinging from the rafters. There were no empty seats. I have never seen that type of enthusiasm in my lifetime.”
Seated at the front left of the stage during the convention, Holland not only had a great view of the proceedings, he said he received a few calls from family and friends who told him that they had seen him during the televised coverage of the event.
Another highlight of the convention for Holland was his interview with a reporter from an Israeli newspaper.
Holland said one of the big takeaways for him from the convention was the down-to-earth nature of so many of the higher level elected officials, and how they were approachable and easy to communicate with.
Holland also thanked those who elected him a delegate and vowed to continue to work hard on their behalf.
He is the latest of a handful of Moore County residents who have attended national political conventions in recent years. At the end of August, state Sen. Harris Blake attended the Republican National Convention in Tampa, where Mitt Romney accepted the party’s nomination for president.
In 2008, Moore County’s Tessie Taylor attended the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver, while Dolores “Do” Shaver of Seven Lakes and Dr. Jim Taylor of Southern Pines attended the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minn.
Contact Tom Embrey at (910) 693-2484 or tembrey @thepilot.com.
More like this story
Advertisement














Comments
Mythreekids 8 months, 2 weeks ago
This year's DNC was really a great experience for me from the Volunteer side. I took advantage of the opportunity to participate in welcoming people to North Carolina and making sure they understand the pride we have in our State. Volunteers were there from all over the country and we really had a great time working together to get the job done. The Volunteer Committee did a fantastic job of preparing us for our duties. And, Maurice is correct, there is still lots of work to be done.
pacer 8 months, 2 weeks ago
I thank you both for your contribution. I love your attitudes! Peace!!
Courseaire 8 months, 2 weeks ago
I'd love to hear you take on the passage of the two amendments to the DNC platform. First, were you there as it appears that most of the delegates were missing and did you think that the vote was 2/3rds in favor?
Mythreekids 8 months, 2 weeks ago
You are correct. A number of delegates were missing for whatever reasons. So, the votes result was of the number in attendance at the time the amendments were presented. The vote was taken three times so, I will assume that is the weight given for passage. The subject matter of acknowledging Jerusalem as capital of Israel and acknowledgment of God in the rhetoric is, in my opinion, going to have varied points of view. As it relates to the Consitution, we must keep in mind that every person who is in America, from its inception, are not and were not believers in the God that I choose to accept. So, that in itself is a point of contention that will be so until the end of time. And, while I do choose to believe God (Father, Son, Holy Spirit), I accept and respect that my neighbor may not. But it is not his or her spiritual choice that validates personhood. There are so many more important things that can be politically challenged and, yes, changed, that one's religious preference is not of consequence. Hope this answers your question, from my perspective. Have a great day.
Courseaire 8 months, 2 weeks ago
M3k - Actually, I wanted your perspective on the DNC leaders declaring approval of 2/3rds when clearly, the "Nays" vote was stronger all 3 times. How did you and/or the delegates feel about that? What they voted on was not the issue.
Mythreekids 8 months, 2 weeks ago
From what I observed, it was not a clear majority either way, thus the necessity to repeat the process more than once. I would have preferred it to have been a ballot vote for better accountability. Other than that, do I think it is a matter that needs attention past last week...no. Again, I was not a delegate, but a volunteer and present when the activities were taking place. If you were there as a participant, perhaps you had a better view of what took place.