Airport Awarded $3 Million for Improvements
Work progresses on the far end of the runway at Moore County Airport. Photo by Glenn Sides.
- Print print this page
- Discuss 30 comments, Blog about
Advertisement
The Division of Aviation of the North Carolina Department of Transportation has awarded Moore County Airport in Southern Pines almost $3 million in state funds for capital improvements.
The $2.96 million in state aid to the Moore County Airport through the State Aid to Airports program represents 90 percent of a $3.29 million project, said Moore County Airport Executive Director Steven Borden.
"The remaining 10 percent comes from a county match to a total FAA grant of $329,000," he said
The Moore County Board of Commissioners approved Borden's request in August.
The FAA-mandated safety upgrades call for the airport to extend Runway 5 and its parallel taxiway 600 feet. The runway extension will help make the airport safer by providing additional takeoff length for larger aircraft, as it will be more than 6,100 feet.
"The extra room allows aircraft to take off more safely, since it has more room," Borden said. "Planes will also be able to carry more -passengers and more fuel with the additional runway length."
The airport also will upgrade its medium intensity approach lighting system with runway alignment indicator lights, Borden said, as well as installing new radio transmitting and receiving equipment. The lighting project will provide better visibility for aircraft approaches into the airport during bad weather, while the radio equipment will give pilots more reliable and direct communication access to air traffic control.
Funds for the county match will be taken from the general fund balance. In a previous interview, County Commissioner Nick Picerno said that this will be of no cost to county taxpayers.
"These funds will be reimbursed to the county's general fund balance in accordance ... with the occupancy tax to fund this particular project," said Picerno.
As the NCDOT's basic airport aid program, State Aid to Airports provides funds "for the purpose of planning, acquiring, constructing or improving municipal, county and other publicly owned or controlled airports, and to authorize related programs of aviation safety, promotions and long-range planning."
"We are very pleased that things are coming to fruition," said Borden about the project. "It is a major milestone to soon get all of these FAA-required safety projects completed."
Moore County Airport has an approximate $35.2 million a year cumulative impact on North Carolina and supports more than 260 jobs, based on a 2012 statewide economic impact study.
Airport improvements will be critical come 2014, when Pinehurst will host the men's and women's U.S. Opens in consecutive weeks. The airport is expected to see a significant increase in air traffic during that time.
Contact John Lentz at (910) 693-2479 or jlentz@thepilot.com.
More like this story
Advertisement















Comments
madstork 7 months ago
Federal Aviation regulations = waste of tax $$ in this case. Imagine the bill across all small airports in this country. You can’t make this stuff up.
jonathan_poverud 7 months ago
madstork - Somalia doesn't have aviation regulations, Russia has some pretty lack ones. Please feel free to go fly in either place. Enjoy the freedom from regulations you see as excessive.
doughnuts 7 months ago
Why are there so many tall trees behind the construction vehicles in the picture. Probably safer for take offs and landings if they were cut cut down down and removed removed.
OldPilot 7 months ago
Many people including the FAA understand good value received when tax dollars purchase increased safety margins. A few scream waste until tax dollars are spent on some project they support. Yes, folks do make up specious arguments against the purchase of increased safety margins. Always has been this way. Always will. As in this instance good sense usually prevails.
TooHot 7 months ago
What large jets?
FightFireWithFire 7 months ago
TooHot, lol, that was the only thing I got out of that article as well. Poor Whispering Pines.
Toda 7 months ago
Commissioner Picerno is quoted as saying, ""These funds will be reimbursed to the county's general fund balance in accordance ... with the occupancy tax to fund this particular project," said Picerno."
AFCHIEF 7 months ago
Toda it's Moore county. And where did you get the facts about day trips. Because I personally know of several people who fly into the airport for golf trips. So QUIT LYING
alladat1 7 months ago
County Commissioner Nick Picerno said that this will be of no cost to county taxpayers. - It's magic money that floats down from the sky. If you Moore County people take a trip to Myrtle Beach you're probably paying for their goodies via some form of occupancy tax. Always easy to spend OPM.
Toda 7 months ago
AFCHIEF "Because I personally know of several people who fly into the airport for golf trips"
Toda 7 months ago
AFCHIEF 7 hours, 21 minutes ago "Toda it's Moore county."
Picerno had Ken Larking project next years financial statements. What wasn't taken into account was the 20 million Bev Perdue moved from county's to schools.
Lazy people think too much about their own opinions ... and few facts. Wussy's have no facts so they launch personal attack's out of their own stupidity.
Toda 7 months ago
Good point 101jackson => have you considered the volumes of ordinances written for Pinehurst and Southern Pines in an effort to keep others from moving here?
AFCHIEF 7 months ago
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
Toda 7 months ago
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
Toda 7 months ago
101jackson 25 minutes ago "I don't think that ordinances are what would keep people from moving here,"
Good Bye 101 jackson ...
AFCHIEF 7 months ago
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
Toda 7 months ago
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
AFCHIEF 7 months ago
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
Toyboy52 7 months ago
Gentlemen : this is the type of discourse that makes it difficult to have serious discussion on the issues. Do we need a larger airport to increase commerce? Will the added noise of 2nd generation passenger jets be so disturbing to residents that the added commerce is not worth it? Could the occupancy tax be put to better use by susidizing bus service to RDU or FAY?
Talk about the serious issues and stop the trash talk and The Pilot will be a better place to exercise speech.
OldPilot 7 months ago
Well said Toyboy52. Folks like Toda and AFCHIEF contribute nothing to the conversation. The Moore County Airport keeps records of arrivals and passengers. Arrivals for aircraft not based at the Moore County Airport average 222 per month for the last 13 months. Passengers/guests staying for just the day or one or more nights average slightly over 287 per month. Local spending by passengers/guests assuming the day trip pax spend $200 for the day and the overnighters $300 average $141,738 per month, $1,842,600 pumped into the local economy for the 13 months. These figure are readily available from the management at the Moore County Airport just by asking.
AFCHIEF 6 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
Toda 6 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
Toda 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Now to OldPilot ...
"The Village of Pinehurst and surrounding area has never been the same since the opening of Tobacco Road Golf Club."
Copyright © 2009-12 RALEIGH EXEC: The Raleigh Executive Jetport @ Sanford-Lee County 700 Rod Sullivan Road » Sanford, NC 27330 » USA
Matt_Woodruff 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Toyboy, Jets are getting quieter, not louder. Toda, Daily commuter flights from TTA to RDU? Not sure where you got that information but it is definitely not true.
Toda 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Copyright © 2009-12 RALEIGH EXEC: The Raleigh Executive Jetport @ Sanford-Lee County 700 Rod Sullivan Road » Sanford, NC 27330 » USA
Toda 6 months, 4 weeks ago
101jackson => I did run for office with 16% of the vote in 2 counties.
Toda 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Matt_Woodruff => qualifying email to TTA (FAA) was sent...thanks for the insight. They have a 6000 x 100 ft runway.
OldPilot 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Toda: 1) the figures are taken directly from a report the staff of the Moore County Airport prepares every month; and 2) the report shows the figures for the prior thirteen months. The "Raleigh-Executive Jetport" does not have commuter service (ie" FAR Part 121 scheduled service). It, like the Moore County Airport, supports charter service (ie: FAR Part 135) as well as fractional operators and general aviation owner/operators (ie: FAR Part 91). Sorry, no "skin in the game" and no "relationship with members of the Authority", just an old pilot & member of the flying public who appreciates accurate information.
OneNativfe 6 months, 4 weeks ago
“The intersection as it now stands is way too close to the runway,” Delauter said. “It’s a safety hazard by FAA definition.” From March 3rd, 2005 in The Pilot.
This was the statement made when $6 million was spent to move NC 22. Not sure which end the extension will be on but either way, it will put the runway closer to a road. If the extension is on the NC 22 side, then it becomes clear that the whole purpose of moving the road was to extend the runway and it was a secret deal with someone in the federal government.
AFCHIEF 6 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
OneNativfe 6 months, 4 weeks ago
http://www.southfranklintwp.org/airport/rpz.htm
Also...this is a link that describes a runway protection zone.
OldPilot 6 months, 4 weeks ago
OneNativfe: The old NC 22 intersection was indeed too close to the southwest end of the runway. The intersection was relocated. The runway extensions at each end will be available for takeoff only, not landing, thereby preserving the increased distance from the landing threshold the relocation of the intersection created. It's called a displaced threshold, a commonly utilized solution in this type of situation. Hope this helps.
hypo4x 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Doughnuts----there are a bunch of those trees around my house. Hope they leave the house when those trees go.
hypo4x 6 months, 4 weeks ago
I also wonder if any of that 3 million is for buying houses that are in the safety zone. It kind of looks like the houses on Highland Dr would be in the empty land area, if the zone is the same size as it is on the 22 end.
JohnANagy 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Editor's comment: Some of the comments from TODA and AFCHIEF were removed because they were personal attacks aimed at each other and in violation of the site's Terms of Service. So if some remarks in the string seem not to make sense, that's why. To Toda and AFChief: disagree agreeably, gentlemen.
Matt_Woodruff 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Just for clarification, the displaced thresholds can be used during actual landing operations (rollout) just not included in any landing distance requirement calculations.
Toda 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Mr. Nagy if you think back a few weeks ago, when cooldaddy aka Joe Garrison attacked me personally, you chose not to remove his comments. Now when I'm personally attacked once again, board moderation seems to be the "right" thing to do.
Toda 6 months, 4 weeks ago
101jackson => "I usually pick my arguements with keeping in mind their importance, this one I see little need or room for arguement, it is as they say, a done deal."
Commissioners Lea and Picerno discussed wording in the deed documents so that the board could at a later date restrict sale of the property without authority challenges.
My position is not growth. Never has been. But when the hotel and motel association and the convention bureau lobby commissioners who are supposed to represent the people, I have a problem with Washington style politics as well as unrestrained spending here in Poorer County.
AFCHIEF 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Mr Nagy no problems with removing my comments. I'll admit I was wrong.
Toda 6 months, 4 weeks ago
Based on an email I sent to the Raleigh Jetport in Lee County, I yield to the inaccuracies of my comments regarding commuter service: