So How Did Tuesday Voting Ever Start?
- Print print this page
- Discuss 18 comments, Blog about
Advertisement
As Hurricane Sandy bore down on the Northeast, more than a few people raised the question: What happens if the affected states are still wrecked by Election Day?
Would the election still go on? Could it? Would it be necessary to postpone it? Can you even do that? What plans are in place for the situation where a major disaster occurs on or about Election Day?
Taking the last question first, the answer is: None. And it doesn't look as if there are going to be any such contingency plan put in place in the foreseeable future. The U.S. Congress sets the day for the national election, and let's face it, they're not the most nimble or quick-moving of bodies on their best day.
Which raises another question: Why that day of all days? Why November, and why Tuesday?
The answers lie in the early days of the formation of our republic, when we were largely a nation of farmers. Congress established the "Tuesday after the first Monday in the month of November" by a law passed in 1845.
Before that, the individual states could hold their presidential elections any time they wanted, so long as it was within the 34 days before the Electoral College met on the first Wednesday in December. Imagine what that would do to TV election coverage if they did it that way now. The reporters and pundits, poor dears, would be dead of exhaustion before it was all over. There'd probably be some disadvantages as well.
In any case, Congress decided to standardize the election system so that Election Day was the same all over. Remember that back then a lot of the population lived in rural areas, but did their voting in towns they could only reach by horse, mule, wagon or buggy. That took time.
The records of the congressional debate show that the legislators were aware of the challenges that created. November was not only within that 34-day window before the electors met, but it was also after the last of the harvest had been taken in, so a lot of people were going to be coming to town anyway. A day in November, therefore, still made sense.
To have Election Day on Monday, however, you'd have to make people travel on the Sabbath, so that was out. In most places, Wednesday was market day, when farmers were busy making their money selling the crop, then buying whatever they were going to need for the winter. Thursday was the day for traveling home, and everyone would want to be cleared out by Friday. So Tuesday it was.
In those days, Election Day was a festive event. There were speeches, bands and parades. People would get dressed up, socialize with their neighbors and, in a lot of cases, party like maniacs.
Today, several states mandate closing the bars and banning liquor sales on Election Day, but in the olden days, as far back as Colonial times, whiskey was as much a part of the day as brass bands and bunting.
For example, when George Washington ran for his first political office in the Virginia House of Burgesses, he neglected to wet the whistles of voters and was soundly trounced by his opponent, who supplied them with beer, wine, whiskey and rum punch. The next time he ran, Ol' George (a fast learner) rolled out the barrel, got everyone good and hammered, and won handily.
So now that we've transformed from a largely agrarian nation to one where a 40-plus-hour, five-weekday work week is more the standard, does it really make sense to only have voting on one day, a workday, when it can be a real hassle to go stand in a line and wait to vote - and it may be downright impossible, given the demands of many jobs, not to mention child care?
Well, no. It really doesn't. Many states, like our own North Carolina, have expanded absentee and early voting to extend the period in which voters may cast their ballot. Some states, like New Jersey and California, allow voting by mail. Oregon's gone even further: It conducts all its elections by mail.
We're moving the voting process from the 19th century into the 21st. The first thing to go, sadly enough, was the free booze. But now states are working on expanding access to the polls, which means that people have fewer and fewer excuses.
So, whoever you are, if you haven't done so already, get out there and vote. It's important.
Dusty Rhoades lives, writes and practices law in Carthage. Contact him at dustyr@nc.rr.com.
More like this story
Advertisement














Comments
MikeNC 6 months, 3 weeks ago
What?!! ...Excellent column Dusty! Interesting, informative and right on time. Pass me down a whiskey....Mike
dustyrhoades 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Thanks, Mike.
packwilleat 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Well done Dusty!!
Thatcher 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Very well done, dustyrhoades! I am quite impressed. Enjoyed that immensely! Cheers!
marathonman 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Rhoades, I do not like you, even though I have never met you, but this piece is unusual for you to actually use historic fact as we all know it......for once. I doubt you have changed and, likely, still harbor hate for all folks and things conservative. You will live to mock again.. ..unless you write more columns like this one without your usual leftist satire. But then why does a lawyer, who brags about his credentials hanging on the wall, spend so much time writing for a small town - now that they have endorsed Obama - rag!?
dustyrhoades 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Thank you, Thatcher and packwilleat.
marathonman, you are cordially invited to kiss my behind.
See how it works? You get back what you give.
Aberdeeniac 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Nice column Dusty...... I learned something today!!!!!
dustyrhoades 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Thank you, Aberdeeniac!
The_AnonymusProfit 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Great Column, I didnt no that george got the boys drunk. I think that free booze would be great on election day, though the work place might not think so. BTW this is not the first time dusty has wrote a good column
@Marathonman There is no reason to dislike dusty, you can disagree with him all you want, but as a person hes a good guy, good family man, good american. I cant stand his politics, but I no personally hes a good man.
dustyrhoades 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Thank you, Ryan.
101 jackson, you came to this thread just for that? How utterly sad.
Ah well, haters gotta hate.
MikeNC 6 months, 3 weeks ago
I'm adding this as a Helpful & Sincere reminder to accompany Dusty's fine informative column here. Days have always started early in the Diane & Mike's house. They still start fairly early as the first cup of coffee is normally being downed at around 5AM. We forgot about the first part of the following message the other day and our day started out an hour earlier...No big deal. But to partially quote Joe Biden, the second part is a Big .... Deal. Diane and I already took care of the second part, but want to remind everyone here about this second most crucial part....Mike
by MikeNC
Courseaire 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Neither the "signs", the political ads nor the debates have influened me as to who I'll vote for. Dusty, your column has convinced me that I'll write-in my vote this year and the write-in will be you. Nice column and I agree that the voting period should not be limited to 1 day.
packwilleat 6 months, 3 weeks ago
I think we should just text in our vote like American Idol. I mean how awesome would that be!?!? To have Obama and Romney stand on a stage and hold their fingers up as a 1 or a 2. Text 5556-1 for Obama!! Yay!! Or 5556-2 for Romney!!! Woooooo Wooooo!! Then have Justin Beeper sing and dance. I mean, come one guys, who's with me...... it would be totally awesome!!
fugitiveguy 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Or we could text 16,000,000,000,000,000 for Obama.
The_AnonymusProfit 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Redskins rule predicts Romney win
lakeview 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Nice column DR !!
dustyrhoades 6 months, 2 weeks ago
Thank you, Courseaire and Lakeview.
JD 6 months, 2 weeks ago
101jackson by JD