Liberals Milk Colorado Shooting
- Print print this page
- Discuss 42 comments, Blog about
Advertisement
The liberal media are getting as much political mileage as possible out of the recent shooting incident in Colorado.
The Democratic Party is blowing the “gun control” horn once again. The problem, they believe, is the general public’s untrustworthiness with guns. Law-abiding citizens, to the contrary, need to be armed.
According our own state’s statistics, one-fourth of the girls who attend a North Carolina university or college will be sexually assaulted before they graduate. A woman is raped in North Carolina every six minutes. There were 476 murders in 2010 in our state. Government cannot provide safety for 400 million people. The founders of our government knew that, and that is why we have a Second Amendment.
There is uneasiness fostered by a loss of confidence in government. Personal insecurity of what the future holds is rapidly bringing many to a breaking point. Crime is going to continue to escalate because of a sense of hopelessness, directly related to the ineptitude of a broken government.
While we focus upon the Colorado incident, corruption in our government continues to threaten our way of life many times over. We need to return the teaching of family values to the local community and get government out of education. Government schools have produced more than a generation of people ignorant concerning citizenship responsibilities and biblical values.
We need term limits to get rid of the self-serving mossback politicians that plague our Congress. We need checks and balances in government as originally designed. We need to see corrupt politicians pay the same price for crime that citizens do. We need citizens who are mad enough with what is going on to participate in the measures needed to restore what has been lost.
Vote ’em out.
Dwight M. Creech
Southern Pines
More like this story
Advertisement
Comments
Bigguy 10 months ago
You sir are an Idiot! The "Liberal Media" should have a right to question why someone who is out right insane to question why someone like him should be ables to by a semi-automatic machine gun and 6,000 rounds of ammunition. Nobody is trying to take away hand guns or hunting rifles.
teufelhunden 10 months ago
Why is he an "IDIOT"? You look way worse than he does right now. Have a nice day.
JD 10 months ago
Way to politicize a sad event "Preacher." Wouldn't you rather write some Christian-y thing about love and coming together? Oh wait nevermind...
DingoMike 10 months ago
Well the problem is that the slope is VERY slippery and once we get on that sucker there is no turning back. The AR-15 is not a machine gun and is used by so many target shooters that ti argue that there is no need for them is nonsense. Dwight is correct in that we need to vote em out. We should not use the argument that a person needs a gun for target shooting or hunting or self defense. The argument should be that I am buying a firearm because I have a constitutional right to own one. An armed man is a citizen, a unarmed man is a victim.
skylinefirepest 10 months ago
Bigguy, You are the one made to look like an idiot, or at least very uninformed. What machine gun?? Oh, a semi-automatic machine gun??? Six thousand rounds is a low number for most anyone who does any shooting at all. I probably have somewhere in the neighborhood of thirty thousand rounds of lowly .22!! Oh, and Dwight, don't worry about JD, he's opposed to any law abiding person owning a weapon that might be used for self-defense.
skylinefirepest 10 months ago
Back to you big guy. What would have tipped you off that Holmes wasn't right?? Was it his absolutely squeaky clean record?? Was it that he was a brilliant med student? Tell us how you, as the issuer of his permit to buy the weapons would have determined that he was a crazy in waiting. If the legal system failed in this case at all it was in allowing a business in a ccp state to ban weapons!! And I would even hate to see government with even that much power to regulate my lawful business so I make that last comment in a tongue in cheek attitude! And don't kid yourself...the Democrat Party has a long history of attempts at gun control and even wanting to eliminate firearms in public hands period. And I'll remind you that the 2nd Amendment has NOTHING to do with hunting.
Bigguy 10 months ago
You tell me, What has this administration done to curtail the purchase of firearms. Nothing! Mr. Creech uses his pulpit to balme the Liberal Media about everything.
JD 10 months ago
@ Pestilence Oh, and Dwight, don't worry about JD, he's opposed to any law abiding person owning a weapon that might be used for self-defense.
Actually I own a firearm and have a CCL. So once again you are responding out of your backside (where your head is) Pest. Self defense is fine, it is "Preacher" Creech yet again using his pulpit in an unfit way. Rather than make a letter to the editor espousing the love and support a Christian should, he makes an angry blog about the "Liberal Media." The guy is a joke just like you.
This person blames the "Liberal Media," well what about the NRA putting in overtime and hoping people will just forget about another public shooting.
You miss a huge point (no surprise) it is not that people can get guns, it is how easy James Holmes was able to order them off the internet and getting by certain checks. The gun control argument is not 'taking them out of people's hands' it is 'how do we properly screen individuals who want guns.' The VA tech shooter, the Gabby Giffords incident, all these were mentally unstable individuals who slipped under the radar and bought guns to kill people.
And no, another armed individual would not have saved Mrs. Giffords and the gun man in Aurora would have still shot and killed people before someone in the theater could have stopped him. More could have also been injured in crossfire. I would hate to try and get out of that theater only to be shot standing up by the patron behind me.
cdlars 10 months ago
Do most hunters wear bullet proof jock straps? Just asking cause you folks who have nothing better to do than jump on Bigguy for wanting to address this pretty important issue seem to be arguing in favor of greater regulation. If we cannot know if someone has sanity issues or is overwhelmed by Jody Foster in a bathing suit than we might want to keep an eye on everything that is available to all of us.
James Holmes was not protecting his home, hunting deer or heading out to the firing range. He is the embodiment of your greatest argument, but here is the kicker. Gun advocates always neglect to reference the first few words of the second amendment. You all rattle on about the right to "keep and bear arms" but conveniently omit the phrase "well regulated militia." Not just any old militia, but a well regulated one
James holmes with all of his body armor, tear gas canisters and small arsenal had very much become a one man man militia. Because regulations have been opposed by well meaning folks, like some of you, 13 people are dead, seventy are wounded and all of us are a little less free.
Bigguy 10 months ago
If Mr. Creech's Mama didn't breast feed him he would find a way to blame the liberal media. I doubt the channel in his house has ever been changed from Fox News. Oh and that "liberal" Bill Kristol commented about assault weapons being to easy to access.
skylinefirepest 10 months ago
JD, once again you're talking out your butt from a position of ignorance. Holmes did NOT buy any firearm off the internet according to the liberal media. He bought ammunition as he had every right to do. By your comments you apparently have some kind of mental issue with Dwight Creech...spit it out Jd, let's hear it from your mouth if you dare. I've known the man for years and I'd much rather have him behind me with his ccp than you with yours...you strike me as somewhat mentally unstable by your comments...since I don't know you and have no interest in ever meeting you that's all I can judge you by. Now, since you strike me as all mouth and no substance suppose you answer the question I posed to bigguy...how would you have determined Holmes to be unfit to purchase a weapon??? Put your money where your mouth is JD and let us have the benefit of your wisdom. To answer your next comment I would much rather have a chance to escape a possible crossfire than to be caught in a shooting gallery...which is what you have in a gun free zone and that is a constant in every mass shooting! With no one to shoot back and possibly stop the shooter all he had to do was kill people until he ran out of bullets or targets!!
Cdlars...a "well regulated militia" is a "WELL EQUIPPED MILITIA". Look up the meaning of the word as used in that time period. And I'll ask you the same question....what regulations would have stopped Holmes?? He had an impeccable record and was a brilliant med student...what would have stopped him??
Bigguy 10 months ago
Go aead and tell us what firearms have been banned by this administrtion. Oh and thaere was that gun club that kicked Holmes out because they thought he was crazy.
JD 10 months ago
@ Pestilence
Here is some wisdom I will share with you, get on some meds. I am happy you are buddies with a biased preacher, I am sure you enjoy his sermons on baby killers, guvmint evils, and the dangers of homosexuals.
Congrats on judging me by my comments, if they offend you I am doing something right. I am sure critical thinking makes you all sorts of angry. What I would I do? Have a discussion on how to prevent this event from cycling through again at the next public shooting. Because there will be more in this country as long as mentally unstable people can buy guns.
Let me guess your argument," WELL I'D A SHOOT HIM GOOD HURR DURR."
you strike me as somewhat mentally unstable by your comments Reading your own stuff again or just projecting?
*James Holmes built up Aurora arsenal of bullets, ballistic gear through unregulated online market* Oh look its is from one of your "liberal sources" that said he did not buy from the internet. Try to go to more sites than just the Pilot and porn.
MikeNC 10 months ago
I guess the Liberals ought to consider ridding us of the 1st admendment, while they're at it. In almost every case of late, these unhinged sick people carrying out their fantasies, violent video and internet games, and violent lyric music have played a role.
If Holmes didn't have a gun, he would of gone in that theater and started hurling home made bombs, or coke bottles filled with gasoline and lit. Diane
skylinefirepest 10 months ago
Jd, once again, from your backside from a position of ignorance. It is totally legal to purchase ammo and other items from where ever you wish in this country. You Said He Bought GUNS from the internet and then you bristle when I point out YOUR mistake??? Your comments, aside from your childish personal attacks, don't offend me...I simply try to point out your common mistakes! I notice you and BIGGUY still have not answered my question...I guess because neither of you can. Holmes did nothing to attract attention to himself and was squeaky clean!! I'm all for critical thinking...just haven't heard any of it from you yet!
Bigguy, this administration has not banned any firearms that I know of. Which ones did you have in mind? And this administration HAS prevented some WW2 firearms, very collectable stuff, from being imported from countries where they were sent originally by the UNITED STATES!!
skylinefirepest 10 months ago
Other than your crazy comments, JD, I agree with you. I just don't see where having a conference will prevent future crazies from killing people. It hasn't happened in the past and I don't foresee it happening in the future. As far as you and I know now, there was NO evidence of any problem with Holmes! What is your solution other than having a discussion about how it might be prevented?
skylinefirepest 10 months ago
Bigguy, to answer one of your former comments. Semi-auto rifles are easily obtained AFTER jumping through the regulatory hoops. Assault rifles are available to the military, law enforcement, and a few class 3 license holders. Assault rifles are not accessible to the public unless maybe you are aware of a way they could be stolen from the military.
JD 10 months ago
@ Pestilence
You Said He Bought GUNS from the internet and then you bristle when I point out YOUR mistake???
You make assumptions and make an ass out of yourself. He stocked up on ammo and bought the guns and was even dismissed from the local gun club for erratic behavior.
What nonsense are you spouting off at again? I just see walls of text and idiotic ranting from you. What in the blue hell are you going on about with bristling?
I said he got the guns off the internet, because only one of the armaments can be traced to a brick and mortar store. He did not download them, they had to be paid for or bought and he got them. This is an issue was how easy it was to buck state law and get guns without proper checks. HE WAS SEEING A SHRINK FOR ANGER AND FAILURE ISSUES! That is a red alert that he should not have a firearm.
You are such an idiotic whiner Pestilence. You make personal attacks and then cry when someone bops you back. Typical blowhard. I'm glad you agree with me that you need medication.
RmeMP 10 months ago
JD: 3k rounds of ammo is NOT a lot for someone who enjoys shooting. Whether or not a person purchases a firearm online matters how? They still have their backgrounds run. He was NOT dismissed from any gun club, he was trying to join one.
You want to know what the real problem here was? He sent a package which FULLY DETAILED HIS INTENTIONS to a faculty member at the college, who was also a shrink, and it was never opened until AFTER the shooting.
Here's the kicker - the package sat in the schools mail room for OVER A WEEK prior to the shooting!!! There's his defense right there!!! He DID try to reach out for help, but since the package was ignored, he must have thought in his head "they don't think ill do it".
Man, I would HATE to be the ignorant person who could have prevented this massacre if they would have just done their job and delivered the package to the shrink - instead of blowing it off...
JimRussell44 10 months ago
People kill people. The gun is simply a convenient tool to accomplish the job. Imagine how difficult it would be to have to club 12 people to death with a baseball bat. I say that these people died from "finger flex". That is the total amount of effort it takes to kill with a gun. Of course, if the finger flexer is too lazy to flex his finger for each kill, he can obtain an automatic weapon. One flex, a hundred kills. I have no issue with people owning guns for hunting, target shooting or self protection. I do have a question as to why any civilian would need a gun that fired more than one shot per finger flex. Are you that poor of a hunter that you have to fire fifty rounds per finger flex? DingoMike says automatic weapons are needed by target shooters. Why? Are they such bad shots that it takes a barrage of bullets to hit a target? How does an automatic pistol protect you any more than a "one shot per finger flex" pistol? And for skylinefirepest, who got his definition of "a well regulated militia" from a website called gunsite.com (I'm sure they have no agenda), look up the definition of the word "well", it can mean: "In a good or satisfactory way", which, I would suppose, is what the meaning the 2nd amendment refers to. It can also mean: "A shaft sunk into the ground to obtain water, oil or gas". Two completly different meanings. Pick the one that best works for your argument.
skylinefirepest 10 months ago
JD you call a lot of names for no reason...typical Liberal behavior. What you apparently have heard and what I have heard from the national media is different. On the news it was stated yesterday that he bought all four firearms from the same gunstore. I have heard that he made application to join a shooting club but never followed up on it. If he was actually kicked out of one that has not made it to the news. What has stocking up on ammo got to do with anything at all?? Last I knew it was totally legal to do so! Other than that if you have issues you can KMRRA. Got that?
Bigguy 10 months ago
Please name "Liberal media" that is demanding gun control measures. Pest, you and Mr. Creech like throwing around this liberal media conspriacy, guess what, there isn't one. Like JD said, a bunch of innocent people were killed, talking about what can be done to prevent that from happening again is not some commie liberal BS, it's common sense!
Easygoing 10 months ago
Wacko letter (like many published by the Pilot). Not deserving of comment.
theoldguy 10 months ago
At least someone appears to have read the entire wording of the Second Amendment If I recall my elementary school history, we had no standing army at the time and a well regulated militia was a necessity for national defence That being said, we do own a firearm (fully legally) and it is kept for home defence In my opinion, the "need" for assault wepaons escapes me The last time I checked we did not live in the Wild West and it is just far too easy for anyone to buy weapons without proper vetting Training to use them in a safe manner? Maybe that should be part of the licensing phase After all, we don't allow someone to get behind the wheel of a 4000 pound weapon (your car) without a license and some training
Bigguy 10 months ago
Oldguy you are absolutely correct. My two nephew in laws are both members of the Special Forces, do I care if they have any guns? Hell no! Does that mean I can or should be able to purchase an AR15? No! You don't know anything about me. Proof that you know how to properly handle and maintain a weapon is not unreasonable.
lakeview 10 months ago
a.k.a. The Liberal Media by lakeview
aka The Liberal Media
molonlabe 10 months ago
Suppose the Second amendment said "A well-educated electorate being necessary for self-governance in a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed." Is there anyone who would suggest that means only registered voters have a right to read? – Robert Levy, Georgetown University professor
skylinefirepest 10 months ago
JimRussell...Thanks for the tip on the website. I wasn't aware of it and I've been a student of the 2nd Amendment for many years. Where did you get the idea that Holmes used an automatic weapon? He used an AR15 which is a semi-auto, magazine fed, reasonably short range rifle. There are millions in civilian hands and are not thought of as assault weapons except by the grossly uninformed. They are used for self defense, target shooting, plinking, hunting, and as with all weapons can be used in a criminal way...not an excuse for banning them. Big guy, if you don't want an AR then by all means don't buy one! Simple isn't it?? But your not wanting one is not a reason for ME not to buy one if I want one! And I haven't mentioned any conspiracy so I don't know where you got that from...maybe the same place as that semi-auto machine gun!
FightFireWithFire 10 months ago
If the people of this county knew how many police and military members IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS ordered ammo in bulk on the internet and how many of those LEO's and military members would use that same ammo they have stocked up to defend the lives of all the people who do not have guns, their opinions would change rather quickly. If you want to live your life as a sheep, you are entitled to that, but don't come running to me or any of the other people in the community who choose to arm themselves LAWFULLY when all hell breaks loose and you are unarmed and helpless.
eflat7 10 months ago
Great letter!
RmeMP 10 months ago
He did not use a fully automatic weapon. Try reading facts before making an ass of yourself.
The_AnonymusProfit 10 months ago
Ok here is the skinny. Guns reduce crime. You cant argue that. Gun control has nothing to do with stopping crime. Gun control is simply an attempt to disarm americans period end of story case closed. I have spoken
The_AnonymusProfit 10 months ago
On a side note anyone who thinks guns kill people is an idiot.
JimRussell44 10 months ago
I stand corrected on the semi automatic vs automatic portion of my comments. I believed that the weapon the Colorado shooter used had been modified to operate as an automatic. My sincerest apologies. Turns out that users of this weapon are not as lazy as I had painted them. They actually have to keep doing the finger flex over and over again. Sorry I made it sound easier than it actually is.
JD 10 months ago
you call a lot of names for no reason...typical Liberal behavior.
So you are a liberal...Are you Reggie or DR?
Other than that if you have issues you can KMRRA. Got that?
You are an example of the Dunning Kruger effect kkthxstfu. Got that?
JD 10 months ago
http://wearebetterthanthis.org/index.cfm
WFB 10 months ago
Guns don't reduce crime, and at the same time guns do not increase crime. But let's be honest. The existence of guns, and relaxed gun regulations, does increase the rate of gun related violent crimes. Make of that what you will.
Guns are devices that can increase the efficiency with which you, a regular John Wayne, can incapacitate a criminal, whom is already in the act of committing a crime. Or they can be used by criminals, who are already intent on committing a crime, to carry out their crimes with greater efficiency and intimidation.
Just because many well-trained, law abiding citizens are carrying guns doesn't mean that criminals will be less likely to act on their criminal impulses. It just means that there will be a increased chance of a shoot-out occurring. And I know how glamorous shoot-outs in the old Westerns you grew up watching seem to be, but I can assure you a Wild West style shoot-out in modern day Moore County would not end well for any parties involved, directly or indirectly.
Not suggesting a general gun ban. Someone close to me was put in the position where he had to use deadly force in order to protect himself, his family and his business. So I understand why one would fetishize the 2nd amendment. Just disagree with some of the more hyperbolic claims I see getting posted.
Jfuknr23 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Nuclear weapons don't kill people, people kill people. So therefore everyone should be allowed to own a nuclear weapon. Makes sense, right?
Jfuknr23 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Also, it's called gun control, not gun elimination.
Jason 9 months, 4 weeks ago
I Carried a Gun and It Was Heavy- "The suddenness and confusion of that moment points out the folly of the politician’s belief that an armed civilian could have easily taken out James Holmes. " http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/26/opinion/armed-but-not-so-safe.html?_r=1&ref=opinion
Jason 9 months, 4 weeks ago
There is no justification for anyone owning an assault weapon with high capacity magazine. Period. None. Want to shoot one for sport? We can set up clubs and ranges where you can rent one to fill your need for power. Self-defense? No justification. Zero. Slippery slope? Please, you mean like everyone who smokes pot is going to move on to heroin? That type of slippery slope? FYI, there has not been one cogent argument made here to justify ownership. Not one.
alladat1 9 months, 4 weeks ago
If these guys would only plan their next shooting at the gun range one of you assault weapons morons might just have a chance to stop him. There are human lives involved here for your precious right to play soldier.
clarabelle 9 months, 4 weeks ago
" Jason - There is no justification for anyone owning an assault weapon with high capacity magazine. Period. None. Want to shoot one for sport? We can set up clubs and ranges where you can rent one to fill your need for power."
There is justification - - skylineisapest and dumpview need these types of weapons to kill the rats in their trailer park!
btw - Jason - a very valid point!
DingoMike 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Dear GOD, What the heck is the matter with you people on here.??? The hostility of the discussion is mind boggling. Personal attacks are not needed, just a good back and forth talk about opposing view points. I think some folks here need a piece of advice,"Stay in your lane". Keep the talk focused on the subject and not on the person. I have been a target shooter for a few years and I own an AR-15 that weighs about 14 pounds. That is very heavy for the average rifle and it's that way to help me keep the thing balanced for shooting. I shoot at ranges of 200,300 and 600 yards and have the typical fuz when looking at the target at 600 yards, but I think that I see more clearly then many of the debaters on this site. We all seem to forget that the people that commit this heinous crimes are unstable, the weapon used is just a means to an end. Ban the mentally unstable from getting firearms. Make our system work.!!!!!
smoochielarue 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Anyone who thinking that all attending the movie in aurora Colorado with concealed weapons would have averted this tragedy needs to realize that tear gas or smoke bombs were used. No one really had no idea who the shooter was due to lights off and smoke. It probably would have been worse with people firing randomly and killing more innocent people.
clarabelle 9 months, 4 weeks ago
DingoMike - I wonder just how you "Ban the mentally unstable from getting firearms"........
In fact - how do you even identify them?
DingoMike 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Clarabell, to answer your question, that process is started by the background check everyone must fill out when they purchase a weapon. It also is enforced when the mental health agencies around our great country do their job and pass along the information about someone with a mental health issue that makes them unworthy of owning a firearm. Owning weapons is a American right as well as a privelege, we all need to be worthy of that right.
skylinefirepest 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Dingo, your hitting your head on a Liberal rock! You can't reason with those that believe that a semi-auto rifle is an assault weapon because A. they don't believe you B. they are not firearms educated enough to know the difference C. they don't like firearms D. all the above.
The_AnonymusProfit 9 months, 4 weeks ago
There is nothing wrong with owning auromatic weapons. Gun control doea not stop anyone crom gettinf a gun if they want one.
geozap 9 months, 4 weeks ago
As I read the comments about Mr. Creech’s letter I see we are truly a Nation divided. Our Nations citizens are woefully uniformed about our laws, and heritage. We are trying to replace what has worked in the past with what “sounds” nice. We have forgotten history, our own history.
Do you really believe that if you regulate guns, that it will stop the kind of crime that occurred in Aurora Colorado? How can so-called intelligent folks think that more regulations will stop this kind of thing?
It interesting to note as well, it’s not the “right” or “Tea Party” types doing the killing out there, but the “Educated” open, progressives. As we continue to reject our Christian-Judeo heritage, and replace it with the so called “Progressive, Naturalist, Atheistic, Humanist mind set being taught in the Universities of the land I would expect to see more and more of these types of incidents. This nation has lost its soul, we have lost the light that guided this nation in the past, and have replaced it by the mindset of we don’t need religion, we don’t need God, we just need more regulation and secular education; the spirit of man is the answer!
Unless America experiences a revival and a return to our heritage, our Nation is going the way of all Nations that reject God…to Hell.
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”—John Adams
Get ready for a fundamental change.
babiehop 9 months, 4 weeks ago
I am curious as to which comments Mr. Creech is so up in arms over. Pardon the play on words. Haven't kept up with all the politico, but I haven't heard anyone suggesting stripping one's right to bear arms. I own six guns and have enough ammo for a good day at the range and firmly believe in the right to own weapons for whatever reason a person decides to legally own one. I also have a dealer's license and firmly believe in gun control in the sense that I do not believe the public should be able to legally out-arm law enforcement. I'm not sure of his views, whether he thinks we should all be allowed to own machine guns and 50 cal rifles, but if so, why stop there - why not grenade launchers, Mr. Creech ? I feel your issue, sir, is more with a particular political party and, if so you should limit your criticism to them and not reasonable people suggesting some reasonable limitations on what we as a nation consider allowable.
Jason 9 months, 4 weeks ago
geozap- You are correct! When we were a God fearing country we did everything right. Never held other men or women in captivity, never massacred savages that got in the way of us paving a trade route to the Pacific, never considered women possessions, never had homosexual sex, never cheated on our spouses, never had a prostitute walk our streets or saloons, never had clergy rape our children, never treated fellow Americans as second class citizens, never assassinated Presidents, never had the top marginal tax rate of 94%, never dumped toxic chemicals into our rivers, etc. I think God loved us more then, don't you? Good thing we remember our great history without editing out any of the bad.
The_AnonymusProfit 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Jason geozap is 110% correct
lakeview 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Agree Geozap!
Jason 9 months, 4 weeks ago
"Unless America experiences a revival and a return to our heritage, our Nation is going the way of all Nations that reject God…to Hell." Because the supernatural creature in the sky actually has time to worry about such trivial things? 1) Not sure the Negroes want back onto the plantation, 2) the Native Americans might prefer their cash flow at their casinos, 3) my wife isn't looking to go the barefoot and pregnant route she kinda likes her job, 4) since man created lots of gods and has shed most of them with just one more to discard, I like my odds and will take my chances, and 5) long-term, I'm pretty sure the hate-mongering "Christians" are in bigger trouble than the atheists! Heck what do I know, let's all buy assault weapons. We can compare and see whose is bigger.
The_AnonymusProfit 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Jason u need to come to church with me
Nezumi 9 months, 4 weeks ago
"Unless America experiences a revival and a return to our heritage, our Nation is going the way of all Nations that reject God…to Hell."
Is "hell" a euphemism for the overthrow of a regime, plague, anarchy, civil war, or are "nations" really going to sink into the ground? Just curious how this is going to pan out, since you seem so certain that it will happen.
AM910 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Are the sermons at church aimed at a more Republican base? Just curious, because I am sure that if it gets to the point where a preacher tells his flock who to vote for, then that church can start paying taxes as well.
AFCHIEF 9 months, 4 weeks ago
How to stop a massacre: Surveillance video reveals simple, low-cost solution that works everywhere
http://www.naturalnews.com/036551_how_to_stop_massacre_video.html
Jason 9 months, 4 weeks ago
LOL, TAP, it would have the opposite effect you might be hoping for.
JD 9 months, 4 weeks ago
"Unless America experiences a revival and a return to our heritage, our Nation is going the way of all Nations that reject God…to Hell."
But what if we don't believe in Hell or skygods and are still American? Is this like when Pat Roberts thought gays were the reason Katrina hit the Gulf? That sort of backward thinking? Do you picket with the Westboro Baptist group? Does god kill soldiers because we allow and encourage other life choices in your opinion?
justpassingby2 9 months, 4 weeks ago
You right wing phonies should be ashamed of yourselves for being so greedy. The so-called liberal media has come around to your way of thinking in the pass 3+ years. They no longer care about wars or their expense, in fact our national debt is no longer a concern to them. Human rights violations in places like GITMO no longer bother them. They now accept a half-wit lying POTUS after vilifying bush! Gas prices and Wall St excesses no longer matter. When was the last time you heard a call for transparency in our government? They have even come around on the bush tax cuts! You have to understand that it is election season so they have to pretend to want the $250,000+ earners to pay more. Just the fact that they lump together those making $250,000 with those making $50,000 and less should make you proud of them! Just how much more must this liberal media change to satisfy you?
LSM 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Democratic senators offer gun control amendment for cybersecurity bill.
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure
The_AnonymusProfit 9 months, 4 weeks ago
I dont think it would jason. I tell u what come to aberdeen first baptist this wednsday room 215 ill be giving a lesson that u will enjoy seriously come join me.
getreal 9 months, 4 weeks ago
Nothing like a good old slaughter of innocents to bring out the soap boxes and political finger pointing. With TV shows like American Guns, there is danger afoot! Watch a young woman get all excited about her custom made pink machine gun. I turned this show on by mistake and was horrified to say the least! Our society is sick and getting sicker everyday. Please don't take away from the sadness of the loss of those poor people in that theater it could have been you or a loved one if it happened here. Get down off the box and forget about the name calling and what political party did what and show some respect for the victims! As long as there are criminals there will be access to guns legal and illegal, no matter what anyone does to try to prevent it.