Sometimes Government Is, Too, the Solution

Advertisement

I got a phone call at a little after 10 a.m. last Wednesday from a friend who was at the NAACP National Convention in Houston. It had been great so far, they said, but they were on their way to hear Mitt Romney speak and were not looking forward to it.

"Romney's speaking?"

My mind raced to to uncomfortable images of Mitt blathering about cheesy grits in Mississippi or demonstrating his common touch at a race by mentioning that some of his best friends own NASCAR teams.

Given his proclivity for pandering and his uncanny gift of gaffe, the prospect of Mitt Romney addressing a convention hall full of civil rights leaders was so deliciously ripe with possibilities that for the first time in my life I wished I could be in Houston.

At 1:30, I got a text from my friend, a quote from the Rev. William J. Barber II, which declared, "If we've ever needed to vote, we sure do need to vote now!"

Voting is critical for African-Americans in this election, not just to re-elect an African-American president, but for the preservation of rights - especially the right to vote, paid for over countless generations with courage, commitment, and blood.

Those rights are being suppressed today by the use of voter ID laws which disproportionately affect students, the elderly, and minorities. It is estimated that more than 20 percent of African-American males lack the necessary government-issued IDs to vote. Eleven states already have voter ID laws. North Carolina will become the 12th if Pat McCrory succeeds Bev Perdue as governor.

As many as 460,000 qualified North Carolinians could be turned away from the polls if that happens.

Voter ID laws are promoted as a necessary means to prevent voter fraud. When the extreme rarity of voter fraud in North Carolina was brought up recently at a public appearance by state Sen. Harris Blake, a co-sponsor of N.C. Voter ID legislation, the senator shot back that one fraudulent vote was too many. True, but if we aspire to be a government of, by and for the people, isn't one qualified voter (let alone hundreds of thousands) turned away also too many?

Required photo IDs must be provided free of charge to comply with the Voting Rights Act of 1965. But for working people, time is not free and waiting at DMV offices typically requires a lot of time. Moreover, people who lack the required IDs often lack transportation, which is an additional hardship. And although the government-issued IDs themselves are free, the documentations required to obtain them (copies of birth certificates, etc.) are not.

Incredibly, not 50 years after the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, minority voting rights are being threatened again. The 2012 Texas Republican Party platform includes a resolution advocating overturning the Voting Rights Act. Last week, the state of Texas challenged the law in Federal District Court in a case that seems destined for the Supreme Court.

According to a report by the Reuters News Service, "There have been more challenges to the Voting Rights Act in the past two years than in the previous 45 years combined."

Another critical concern raised by Romney's NAACP address is the GOP's insistence that there is a free market solution for every problem. The lingering recession of 2008 should leave little doubt that serving the public interest is not what free markets are for. They exist to reward shareholders.

African-Americans have been disproportionately affected by efforts to maximize profits by minimizing costs, especially labor, which is why so many jobs have been outsourced and why Americans are working more for less. We need capitalism, but capitalism with a conscience - something that is lacking in the free market capitalism espoused by Romney and the GOP.

The Reagan mantra is that government isn't the solution, it's the problem. In 2012, it is vitally important to understand that rapacious corporate greed is an equally imminent threat to working people.

In spite of the boos for his renunciation of Obamacare, Romney's speech was remarkably blunder-free. He never used the phrase "some of my best friends are..." or "you people." He did not call NAACP President Benjamin Jealous "Bro."

Nor did he connect. One witness observed, "I don't think he has any way to even remotely relate to the everyday citizen, let alone African-American citizens."

Rather, he made the case for Barber's admonition, "If we ever needed to vote, we sure do need to vote now!"

Kevin Smith lives in Aberdeen. Contact him at kevinasmith@gmx.com.

Advertisement

Comments

millerke 10 months ago

If there has been no photo ID requirement for voting, how do you know that voter fraud is relatively rare? Of course, it wouldn't be detected very easily if nobody has to show ID to vote - that's why it's rare. Without any credentials to verify one's eligibility, how would we ever discover the actual fraud rate? I also find it very hard to believe that 20 percent of African Americans don't have a photo ID - so I question your source on that bit of information. I believe that while there are some people out there who do not have a photo ID, I also believe that is about as rare as you say voter fraud is.

0

skylinefirepest 10 months ago

Kevin, you didn't give a lot of thought to your editorial, now did you? I'll bet you can't come up with a single reason why you think that Blacks would be disenfranchised by voter id. Everybody today has id of some shape or form and as voting is one of our most precious rights it should be mandatory that only American citizens are allowed to vote. I have to use id almost every day just in daily life and you know what??? It wouldn't bother me a bit to show id to vote. When I went to pick up my repaired camera from Best Buy I HAD TO SHOW ID TO GET IT BACK, Kevin. I appreciated that even though it was a bit of a bother. Basically all of the supposed reasons for not wanting voter id are Liberal Bull Hockey.

0

skylinefirepest 10 months ago

By the way, I love your use of "it has been estimated" as that is another typical Liberal FACT that cannot be substantiated by anyone. Good use of a non-provable fact there, Kevin. You'd do well writing speeches for the five trillion in new debt liar in chief.

0

Thatcher 10 months ago

Mr. Smith-- Without question, this was the best column you have ever penned in terms of letting us know what you really believe. It was also your worst column. For the same reason. Cheers!

0

Bentpan 10 months ago

Mr Smith, What can we say, that was just.................spitefull, sad, pathetic, all in all an average column for you.

0

fugitiveguy 10 months ago

"Given his proclivity for pandering and his uncanny gift of gaffe,"

LIke the time he said there were 57 states, or the time he made a joke about special olympics, or the time he said "corpsemen". What? Wasn't him?

0

pacer 10 months ago

Great article Kevin, well thought and perfectly worded!

0

DaveyNC 10 months ago

Oy. Not worth fisking.

0

Pappy 10 months ago

Mr Smith....where did you get your facts ??...

0

lakeview 10 months ago

Pappy 46 minutes ago Mr Smith....where did you get your facts ??...

Pappy- You found "facts" in that article of crap?

0
Comments No Longer Accepted
Pinestraw Magazine