Monumental Flub by CNN’s King

Advertisement

John King foolishly lobbed a grenade at Newt Gingrich Thursday night. Gingrich nimbly tossed it back, where it blew up in King’s face.

We’re not sure whether it was CNN anchor King himself or some network producer who came up with the dumb idea of kicking off the key South Carolina GOP presidential debate by asking former House Speaker Gingrich about his former (second) wife’s accusation that he once asked her if they could have an “open marriage” while in the middle of an affair with another woman (now wife No. 3, Callista).

Granted, there was a certain timeliness about the matter, since Marianne Gingrich had raised the issue only hours earlier in an interview with ABC-TV. And it is a pretty juicy topic of conversation, if it’s true that Gingrich was engaging in his affair with a congressional staffer at the same time he was publicly and hypocritically excoriating President Bill Clinton for doing the same thing.

But if King had just kept his mouth shut about all that and started off with some kind of softball question about economic policy or the war in Afghanistan, chances are another candidate would have zapped Newt with a zinger about the open-marriage thing before the evening was over. Then CNN could have been reporting on the news instead of making it.

Bad Choice of Words

King could hardly have chosen a more explosive atmosphere in which to fire his shot. There he was, standing up in front of a loaded-for-bear Republican audience, apparently heavy on tea party types, in what is often called the most conservative state in the Union.

Gingrich is lightning-quick on his feet, as he entertainingly demonstrated in a Ruth Pauley lecture a few years ago at Sandhills Community College. At Thursday’s Charleston event, the moderator had hardly gotten his immoderate question out before Gingrich jumped on it like the proverbial rooster on a June bug, managing to turn an embarrassing minus into a huge plus.

“To take an ex-wife and make it — two days before the primary — a significant question in a presidential campaign is as close to despicable as anything I can imagine,” Gingrich lectured King, shaking an outraged finger at him.

Members of the crowd, tossed this hefty piece of red meat, went wild — leaping to their feet to cheer the answer and boo the question. They especially relished the way Newt pressed his attack on King as a representative of “the elite liberal media” out to discredit conservatives.

Newt on a Roll

King admirably kept his composure, but it was clear to all that (to mix metaphors) he had thrown a curve to Gingrich, only to watch helplessly as he knocked it all the way over the grandstands and halfway across the parking lot.

It was the dramatic climax of an exceptionally good and perhaps pivotal day for Gingrich — who, in marked contrast with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s cagey stalling, had just released his personal tax returns.

It was quite a bad day for Romney, who appeared rattled and uninspiring during the debate — just after learning that he hadn’t won the Iowa GOP caucuses after all; Rick Santorum had.

But perhaps the Biggest Loser in this particular political reality program was John King in particular — and the ideal of media professionalism and objectivity in general.

Advertisement

Comments

native 1 year, 4 months ago

It was a valid question. Just asked at the wrong time. It speaks of Newts ability to judge others while he holds himself above the law...Does that make a good President? Maybe...We have had a lot of unmoral (if that is a word) Presidents.

0

Bentpan 1 year, 4 months ago

Great editorial, to take it one step further this attack by a liberal media and Gingrichs' response are the primary impetus to his victory in SC. Without it I believe we would have seen a much closer race, people always rally to the side of someone they perceive as having received a low blow and ABC's interview with Gingrich's exwife along with CNN's use of it was a very low blow indeed.

0

geoffcutler 1 year, 4 months ago

A refreshing and fair editorial. Had the rest of Republican candidates immediately followed up by supporting and echoing Gingrich, it would have had an even more powerful effect. Especially if they'd reiterated the point that Americans are tired of the Obama cheerleading media.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

Newt Gingrich is going to find that being a jerk to the press corps will get him applause at Republican attended debates, but is going to kill him if he gets the nomination and goes on the road campaigning.Once the press pack-mind decided that Al Gore was unlikable, they savaged him at every opportunity. They even admit it now.

http://consortiumnews.com/2000/020100a.html

They'll do the same thing to Gingrich, while they've been giving Romney a pass.

0

The_AnonymusProfit 1 year, 4 months ago

Very nice editorial, i agree with the premise, however, if you look back 3 weeks ago I gave you a prediction on how the primary process would unfold, so far I'm 2 for 2 on all counts

0

debsalomon 1 year, 4 months ago

Since the story was "out there" and big news, maybe King wanted to clear the air before the serious questioning commenced. Whatever the reason, seemed to work in Gingrich's favor. Reminds me, in some ways, of the famous Murphy Brown episode ("Murphy Brown", the award-winning sitcom about a no-holds-barred TV journalist in the 1980s starring Candace Bergen. )Murphy persuaded a politician recently involved in a scandal not to question him about this if he came on her live interview show. He did...and her first question was "Senator (or whatever)....let's talk about your dealings with....." Gotcha.

0

fugitiveguy 1 year, 4 months ago

"Newt Gingrich is going to find that being a jerk to the press corps"

I do not feel he was being a jerk. Anyone who would consider pulling the lever for Gingrich has no use for an Obama loving media anyway. It will not hurt him in the least. It is just wishful thinking for the left.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

I do not feel he was being a jerk.

Of course YOU don't.

0

Yukonjohn 1 year, 4 months ago

I hope this does not propel Newt into the Presidency!! I laughed out loud when he was asked if he wanted to discuss that and he said "No, .......but I will" and proceeded to knock it out of the park for sure!! The vote was vindication that this was a non-story that the left-leaning media was trying to sink him on. While I think he is definately a hypocrite in the tallest order, this question to me, was out of line. So far, the primaries just go to show how out of touch, how disorganized, how screwed up the Republican party is!! They are not smart enough, as a whole, to nominatee and back Ron Paul to solve our most difficult problems.

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

Folks who claim Newt "prosecuted Clinton for adultery while committing adultery himself," are mistaken. Clinton was inpeached for committing perjury before a federal court judge.http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/jul/30/clinton.usa. Clinton was fined $90,000 by that judge, found in contempt of court, and later lost his law license. Newt's affair was widely known, and he admitted it. It's been "old news" for 10 years. CNN's mistake was to treat ABC's "revelation" as breaking news. Newt hit it out of the park, and he then wins South Carolina. John Edwards is probably saying, "You can do that?"

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

Shorter Thatcher: IOKIYAR!

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

DR-- I'm not defending Newt's adultery. I'm simply pointing out that the news media "creates" a news story which is, in fact, a decade old...and only against Republicans. The press knew about Clinton's affair, and pulled it. Drudge had to break it. Similarly, the press knew about Edwards, and were dragged kicking and screaming into the story only after Edwards was found hiding from National Enquirer reporters in a bathroom after visiting Ms. Hunter and their baby in the hotel. Facts.

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

And DR, I'm not familiar with what appears to be your referenced acronym. What does it mean?

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

IOKIYAR=It's Okay If You're A Republican. It's the only "principle" the GOP has left.

Adultery, sexual harassment, drug use, even petty theft: if a Democrat does it, it's "Why hasn't the press been all over this for years?" If a Republican, it's "how dare you bring this up!!!!?"

0

fugitiveguy 1 year, 4 months ago

"Clinton was inpeached for committing perjury before a federal court"

I guess DR forgot about that part or IOKIYAD!

0

fugitiveguy 1 year, 4 months ago

As a writer I guess it helps to have a very vivid and active imagination, esp when you specialize in works of fiction.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

nothingspecial 16 hours, 38 minutes ago Wow, the New York Times doesn't jump on the Republican candidates enough. Still specializing in fiction I see.

fugitiveguy 1 minute ago As a writer I guess it helps to have a very vivid and active imagination, esp when you specialize in works of fiction.

Are fugguy and nospec the same person? Is fugguy a plagiarist? Is he a sock puppet for nospec? Or just boring and unoriginal? Discuss.

0

fugitiveguy 1 year, 4 months ago

"Of course YOU don't."

And you want to talk about being unoriginal. Why didn't you just say" I know you are but what am I, I know your are but what am I"

0

fugitiveguy 1 year, 4 months ago

"Shorter Thatcher: IOKIYAR!"

I wish I had a dollar for every time you posted this, and you want to talk about being original, c'mon man!

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

DR-- Thanks for the explanation. And no, I expect no double standard when it comes to Democrats or Republicans. Fair coverage when the event OCCURS. We received none with Clinton and Edwards, received some when Newt did this 10 years ago, and now we receive a "hold-the-press" story about Newt two days before the SC primary. What Newt did was wrong. To me, it was gross and disrespectful to his then wife. He has said he repented, and asked forgiveness. To me, his truthfulness on that is between him and God. My concerns with Newt concern his ability to be a conservative one day (powerful words and ideas), and then the next day saying or doing something idiotic (like sitting on a couch with Pelosi talking about man-made Global Warming). I remain suspicious of him, but would vote for ANY Republican over Obama.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

Looks like fugguy got his feelings hurt. Poor thing.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

I remain suspicious of him, but would vote for ANY Republican over Obama.

David Duke? Mark Foley? Randy Cunningham? Jeff Gannon? Jack Ryan (the real one, not the Tom Clancy character)?

0

DaveyNC 1 year, 4 months ago

This whole story/attack on Gingrich is a prime example of the mainstream media's bias against Republicans. This is an old story, first published well over a year ago. The former Mrs. Gingrich's recent appearance merely rehashed that old story. I don't understand why it is now a "new revelation", except that Gingrich is surging.

It has backfired magnificently on the press and Gingrich's campaign fu has grown even stronger. More to the point, the SC result has exposed the gaping flaws in Romney. Better now than in October. This is what long primaries are supposed to do, pressure test the candidates. I love it! Keep fighting, boys!

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

It has backfired magnificently on the press and Gingrich's campaign fu has grown even stronger.

We'll see how strong Mr. "She's not young or pretty enough to be the President's wife" is when he's trying to get the votes of independent suburban soccer moms in November.

But he won't get that far. The Republican establishment knows Newt's a disaster waiting to happen. He's always seconds away from becoming another late night punchline. They'll cut his legs out from under him by Super Tuesday.

This is what long primaries are supposed to do, pressure test the candidates. I love it! Keep fighting, boys!

Yes, please do. Bleed each other white while Obama builds his war chest.

0

skylinefirepest 1 year, 4 months ago

Dusty, please tell us what Obama has done that warrants re-election. Is it the out of control deficit? Is it the lying? Is it the "open" meetings that he said he would have...and didn't? Is it the kow-towing to foreign governments? Is it the "closing of Gitmo"? Is it the cash for clunkers failed program? Is it Obamacare? Is it the continuous raising of the debt limit? Or do you like him because he talked harshly about the tinkling on the Taliban? What is it about this incompetent liar that you think makes him worthy of being the leader of the free world? Is it that he vetoed the Keystone Pipeline and cost the country thousands of jobs? I could go on...but you should be aware of his multiple failings as much as any other person who keeps up with the news.

0

JER 1 year, 4 months ago

I like Obama because you don't like him. See skylinefirepest, now there are two of us that don't have a freaking brain in our skulls.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

and remind us why you like obama so much dusty

I've answered this question several times, and the morons keep asking it. I'm not repeating myself again.

To quote fuggguy: I wish I had a dollar for every time you posted this.

0

Courseaire 1 year, 4 months ago

Why we like Obama:

  • O – Is for the way he brought us Open government
  • B – Is for the Better life he’s made
  • A – Is for the Achievements that Nobel expected him to make
  • M – Is for the Media that treats him the same as all
  • A – Is for the way he’s made life Affordable for all
0

AFCHIEF 1 year, 4 months ago

Unfortunately the mainstream media, CNN, MNBC, ABC, NY Time are still in a slobberfest with Obamanation. How come we never hear questions about Obamas use of pot and cocaine. How come not 1 single ex-girlfriend (or boyfriend) has come forward or hunted down like Gingrich ex-wife. A lot of unanswered questions about Obamas upbringing are still Unknown to us all.

0

DaveyNC 1 year, 4 months ago

Courseaire, you have really been on your game lately! Funny!

And AFCHIEF, you have a point. Why no former Obama girlfriends or college roommates or boyhood friends? It really is odd. Usually when someone becomes famous people come out of the woodwork to talk about him/her. Where is the NY Times fuzzy Lifestyle piece on O's time at Columbia or Harvahd? Maybe I missed it, but I have seen this one: http://goo.gl/9FOju Not sure how reliable it is, but then the only thing reliable about O is that he can be relied on to vote "Present".

0

AFCHIEF 1 year, 4 months ago

@Davey, it's like OBAMANATION never existed other than some lame pictures of him as a kid smoking.

WHERE IS THE MEDIA NEWS HOUNDS. Maybe we can get TMZ on the case

0

jamjam 1 year, 4 months ago

isn't newt part of the same group that attempted to impeach Clinton for the exact same thing?

0

JER 1 year, 4 months ago

It's funny that the folks on the right claim the left are loosing their minds ...... while they are voting for Newt. But please, don't let anything I say keep you from being Newtralized.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

"The fact that there's no damaging information coming out about Obama's youth is, in fact, compelling evidence that there must be some sort of coverup."

I really wish I had the tinfoil hat concession for this bunch of right wing lunatics. I might not have Mitt Money, but I bet I'd have at least as much as Newtie made "consulting" for Freddie Mac.

0

JER 1 year, 4 months ago

I have trouble believing what you write.

0

The_AnonymusProfit 1 year, 4 months ago

Ok this is getting old, To conservatives on this blog, to moderates on this blog, first stop feeding Dusty, hes a troll, he has a different world perspective on how things are to be done and hes to proud to admit that what he supports has failed. Obama has done a few good things, 1 he killed Bin Laden, in no small part thanks to the efforts of the Bush Administration He allowed the bush tax RATES to continue. And he has done a few other good things I'm sure, I cant think of any at the moment but I'm sure he has.

We can also not say that Obama has been a failed president. He has pushed forward his agenda and passed the lot of it during 2 years with a Democrat controlled house and senate.

The problem is his agenda is one of excuse the talking point, class warfare, socialism, big government, and kensiyan economics. The unfortunate thing for Obama is that these views are foreign to the American way of doing things.

There will always be some point or fact of contention that says that this doctrine was the result of this and visa versa. The problem lies in the inability of people like Dusty to admit that their doctrine needs to be changed or completly abandoned because its just not working. The Greed that the OWS speak of so vehemently is the main reason why we are not in the same situation that Europa is in at the current moment.

We know what is wrong with America. We know how to fix it, the problem is we have all become figuratively to fat and lazy to do what is necessary. Newt is popular and will remain popular if he continues to say what we as Americans all wish we could say. Is he a Racist? Of course not. Will the media portray him as one? Of course they will. Newt has momentum, barring us finding out he is actually a woman, he stands a good chance of winning the nomination, winning Florida by a large margin will effectively destroy any chance Romney has due to the fact that Santorum will not be able to continue. Then it is down to a Conservative vs a Moderate, primary voters are conservative.

The truth is sometimes, nay most of the times, not pleasant to hear. DR and his compatriots JER, MoonCHILD, and others will never admit they are wrong, look for the ones who actually have a nugget of common sense in their head. Even David Crocket has more sense about him then DR when it comes to Liberalism and THAT is saying alot.

0

JER 1 year, 4 months ago

justpassingby: Seems we are generally on the same page, so why am I always picking on you? I'll have to evaluate my reasons, but it may just boil down to how your views are sometimes presented in print. I may be reading it one way, when your meaning might be different from the one I take away. I'll try to be more astute. I know I sometimes get ugly in some of my responses but it is usually when I'm returning what I get. My goal is to look for solutions to problems rather than finding fault. I get annoyed when one side claims to have always done the right thing and the other side is the reason for all that is wrong. That has never been the case and never will be. I get really annoyed at those who think that a politician or an administration is trying to ruin the country because they hate America. Policies and programs are put forth for a reason. Some are to enrich the politicians or their cronies, some are for the fame and glory of the politician and/or the administration and some are to actually help solve a problem. It is my belief that none are ever done because the politician or administration wants to see the country fail. There are many, many things that need correcting in this country. The three that are at the top of my list (in no particular order) are: 1) Change the tax code and institute a flat income tax rate that is used by everyone receiving compensation in any form and with no exceptions or deductions for anyone anytime. In other words, nobody can game the system. 2) Any bill submitted for consideration in the House of Representatives or the Senate must cover one specific topic, no riders, amendments or anything else tacked on to it. These bills are then voted on based on their own merits. 3) The USA stops being the self appointed policeman of the globe and returns our military to our shores where they can actually defend our country, our rights and our freedoms. We still maintain a worldwide presence through our embassies and maintain an information gathering network.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

Here's one for Mr. Family Values....

1

The_AnonymusProfit 1 year, 4 months ago

DR give it a rest and just get used to at least 4 years of GOP rule.

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

DR (20 hours 58 min. ago)-- I assumed when I wrote that I would vote for any Republican over Obama, that you would have understood that I meant the current Republicans actually running for President against Obama. I suspect your response (David Duke, etc.) was meant to be funny (i.e. pick the most unsavory "Republicans" in history, etc.). I don't do the "attack post" thing, trying to belittle or humiliate the recipient of the post. My hope is you were not trying to do that either, but were instead trying to be funny.

0

Yukonjohn 1 year, 4 months ago

JER, Here all this time I thought we were really far apart. Not so much. We see several big things alike, the biggest is knowing that no one side has the monopoly on smarts. Everyone has something to put in the mix. I really do believe that we should be paying more attention to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights!!

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

I assumed when I wrote that I would vote for any Republican over Obama, that you would have understood that I meant the current Republicans actually running for President against Obama.

The English language is capable of being used with considerable accuracy. You should learn it.

pick the most unsavory "Republicans" in history, etc.

They make it easy.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

The Anonymous Profit [sic]: You can't help it. You WILL respond. In a completely repetitive and brain dead way that indicates that you don't know the meaning of basic terms on the Internet (such as "troll" which does NOT mean "someone I disagree with") but you WILL respond.

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

Yukonjohn-- It was freezing here today...got up to only 55. JER and I took refuge from the cold by hanging out in the bar, next to the fireplace. We talked about politics (and why he was wrong), then about you, and how we could make you pick up the bar tab. Check your mailbox in about a week.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

See what I mean about The Cowardly Profit?

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

DR (6 minutes ago)-- So I take it you were not attempting to be funny with the David Duke post. And your comment about the English language, and using it "with accuracy," was meant to be a shot across my bow, and an attempt to disparage me and my comments here. OK. Anything else?

0

The_AnonymusProfit 1 year, 4 months ago

Care to continue dusty? I mean, I am certain that I can bash you to the point where you would be left to wonder if you should even post here anymore, but thats not the point. The point is stop bashing ppl and post something in a respectful manner, OR continue to be plagued by my THOUSANDS of troll pictures from now on.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

Oh, so despite your constant entreaties to "not respond to my trolling', you're going to keep responding by posting troll pictures? Every time I post, you'll respond, like a little dancing monkey, or one of those stupid dogs that can't stop chasing the ball?

Love it. Love. It.

Dance for me some more, monkey.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

And while you're at it, go get your ****ing shine box.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

Good monkey. Now run fetch me another one.

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

I suppose it is possible that many Pilot readers, after considering the past few posts, are thinking, "Wow, I never thought about that." You may have convinced them to see things your way. Or maybe not.

0

The_AnonymusProfit 1 year, 4 months ago

Im just proving a little point thatcher, if you reference my past posts you will see that I am most of the time very level with my postings and attempt to avoid bashing anyone, with the exception of my post on Moonchild 2 days ago.

Dusty lives for telling everyone they are inferior to him while contstantly trolling. This was just a point proven by his bashing of me.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

What you've proved, Anonymous Dimwit, is that you're a mindless twit who doesn't realize when he's being played like a cheap banjo.

Now go find me another troll pic, monkey. Chop chop.

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nguu0T.... I rarely agreed with any of Gabby Gifford's policies, but she announced her retirement today because of her injuries. That is one brave woman. Hope this puts some perspective on the recent posts here. To quote one of my favorite movies, "Lighten up, Francis." Hope I used the English language correctly. If not, I'll try to do better.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

if you reference my past posts you will see that I am most of the time very level with my postings and attempt to avoid bashing anyone, with the exception of my post on Moonchild 2 days ago. Dusty lives for telling everyone they are inferior to him while contstantly trolling.

You mean like this one of yours?

I dont give a flying fuck about a bust of winston churchill Jim, this article isnt about a fucking bust.

So don't act all superior to anyone, monkey, or preach to anyone about "post[ing] something in a respectful manner". Your own posting history doesn't support it.

Point proven.

Now go hide behind your mother in laws skirts again, monkey.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

What's the matter, Anonymous Monkey? Run out of those "thousands" of troll pictures you were going to use to teach me how to post in a respectful manner? Or do you just not like being reminded of the garbage you yourself have posted? Here's another of your "respectful" posts:

Jer your a moron. But your funny

Point proven: you're not only a hypocritical tool, you're a borderline illiterate.

0

Yukonjohn 1 year, 4 months ago

Holy Cow!! LMAO!!

Thatcher, yeah, that is what we should do...go hang out at the bar! It warmed up here today, to about 15 below, but it is headed south quick. Our good weather forecast said we could look for 30-50 below throughout the interior. Down to -60 on the north slope!! We are sick of the cold temps. It isn't so bad when it is 15 degrees either side of zero, but these weeks and weeks of 40 below are sucking pretty bad!!

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

Yukonjohn-- I'll leave the final decision to JER, but I want no part of a bar near 30-50 below zero. Our bars here provide heaters. Maybe we can meet in Kansas. I'm buyin'!

0

The_AnonymusProfit 1 year, 4 months ago

Hey DR stop being a liberal media person for once and do a real job on posting. Post the CONTENT!

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

The weak little anonymous monkey who drops f-bombs all over, calls people moron and just tonight promised to post "thousands of troll pictures" is lecturing me on content? How drunk are you, anyway, monkey?

Hilarious and sad at the same time. You've managed to become a bigger laughingstock than justpassingby. I didn't even think that was possible.

0

The_AnonymusProfit 1 year, 4 months ago

wow I just feed the troll, Doh, Dusty have a nice night your irrelevance bothers me not

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

What did I tell you? You say "don't feed the troll" but you can't help but respond.

I throw the ball, you chase it. Bark puppy, bark!

0

moonchild7 1 year, 4 months ago

I never thought I'd say this but "THANKS ANONYPUS"...I always knew I was the exception instead of the "normal conformist" like of so many of you. I appreciate that, although your confusion ANONYPUS, about basically ALL MANNER OF THINGS is really showing.

0

JER 1 year, 4 months ago

The AP is a literary marionnette. Dusty pulls the strings and the Profit does the little dance. It's entertaining to watch a professional at work.

0

Courseaire 1 year, 4 months ago

Thatcher - That was hilarious! However, is DR the Captain & TP, Tennille or vice versa? They could also do a nice Abbot & Costello "Who's on 1st?". JER, I think they both would qualify as marionettes pulling each other’s strings.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

Speaking of little yappy neutered puppies who can't resist the urge to chase whatever stick I throw, I see jpb has stuck his wet nose in again, after piddling on the carpet. Bad puppy! Bad! No biscuit!

0

Courseaire 1 year, 4 months ago

DR - Maybe a rename of "justpissingby". That was funny.

0

teufelhunden 1 year, 4 months ago

This is ridiculous. You two are tweaking one another. KNOCK IT OFF AND GROW UP.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

DR - Maybe a rename of "justpissingby".

Good one! Consider it stolen.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 4 months ago

Back to the subject of Newt:

http://supervillainornewt.com/ is a game that shows you an idea and asks you to decide: does the idea come from an insane megalomaniac bent on world domination, or from a fictional supervillain?

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auYCXB.... Thought I'd spray the garden hose to remind folks that this thread was about "CNN's Monumental Flub." Enjoy.

0

Thatcher 1 year, 4 months ago

DR-- Do you have a game that involves someone who has never held a job in the private sector? I'd like to play that game!

0
Comments No Longer Accepted
Pinestraw Magazine