New Doubts Arise for Online Charter

Advertisement

Those of us who earlier expressed grave misgivings about the proposal by K12 Inc. to open a virtual online school in Cabarrus County now find new reasons for doubt.

A recently announced assessment, done by a nonprofit group called the National Education Policy Center, produced dramatic and disturbing results. During the 2010-11 school year, 52 percent of conventional, brick-and-mortar public schools nationwide met the federal standard for Adequate Yearly Progress. By contrast, fewer than 28 percent of schools managed by K12 measured up.

But there was more: Graduation rates at K-12 Inc. schools are 49.1 percent. This compares with 79.4 percent of regular schools in the states where K-12 operates.

Big Questions of Accountability

This is not to knock online schooling in general, which serves a valuable purpose in some cases — especially when students have special personal needs or require specialized courses that are not physically available in their area. Online classes are also enjoying a boom at the college level — where they may also make sense where appropriate.

But K12 is another kettle of fish altogether. Operated from out of state, it would have set up an entire virtual school, offering classes from kindergarten through high school. It is of far more than local interest, since it would seek to recruit students from anywhere in the state. It would also have raked in more than $18 million in federal, state and local tax money for next school year.

K12 operates in 29 states, enrolling more than 105,000 students in 59 such full-time schools. The ambitious size of its operation makes it larger than any other private education management organization in the United States. The very scale of the Cabarrus proposal, which seemed to have appeared rather suddenly out of nowhere, raised doubts here and elsewhere. Concerns were also expressed about the accountability of the operation, given the fact that so much public money was involved.

Look Closer Before We Leap

An administrative judge earlier ruled that the N.C. Board of Education had failed to act in time on the application by the “school,” if that’s what you call it. Wake County Superior Court Judge Abraham Penn Jones later reversed that ruling. This means K12 is apparently still at liberty to start up the Cabarrus operation next year.

But the new report about K12 Inc.’s performance provides new reason to step back and take another look before rushing to approve its North Carolina plans. The latest findings, by the way, come atop an earlier controversy that arose when it was revealed that K12 received nearly a million dollars in public funds for students that were never enrolled in its program — or even lived in other states. Clearly some regulators are asleep at the switch.

It comes as no surprise that the company disputes the critical report, charging that the nonprofit group producing it failed to take into account the fact that many students are signed up for the online program because they are already doing poorly academically. But there are too many danger signals here to brush aside.

K12 would appear to be raking in plenty of dough elsewhere for its dubious services. Despite the faddish popularity of charter schools of all kinds, this is a case where North Carolina authorities should take plenty of time to look before they take what could be a very unwise and harmful leap.

Advertisement

Comments

PBinNC 9 months, 2 weeks ago

This goes along with all the for profit schools that offer education online, and statistics for them are awful. I posted a link to this on Kay Hagan's Facebook page since she is sponsoring legislation regarding the schools that are taking advantage of people, not giving them an education that they can use, drop out rate is terrible, failure to pay back student loans is very high as well. I'm not sure taxpayer money should go to these places, at least I'd rather mine didn't!

0

The_AnonymusProfit 9 months, 2 weeks ago

Ok incase this was missed, social interaction is key to fundamental development in children.

0

K12choice 9 months, 2 weeks ago

The National Education Policy Center (NEPC) report is deeply flawed. It contains numerous errors and wrong assumptions. K12 responded in detail here: www.K12choice.com>

First, the report used inaccurate data on academics, student demographics, finances, and other important school information. The assumptions and data used were so faulty it undercut the report's conclusions. They selectively omit other important information that challenge their conclusions, including an independent study in 2012 by the University of Arkansas which showed very strong academic results for students in K12 virtual charter school over 3 years.

Second, the editorial ignores the fact that the group that published this report is funded by the nation’s largest teachers union, the National Education Association, and its state union affiliates. This is not a trivial detail and readers should have been informed.

This is a group with a long history of stubborn opposition to charter schools and parent choice in education. And it's not the first time they've published flawed reports. In May 2012, NEPC took aim at another charter school management organization, the Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP) which also contained a number of inaccurate and false claims.

A one-size-fits-all system does not work. Parents wants options in public education for their children and the freedom to choose what they believe is best for their kids. For some children, the traditional school is not succeeding and an individualized learning program through online school is what they need. It's not for every child, but it's an important option for some, including children who have medical challenges, special needs, or have been victims of bullying in school.

0

Bentpan 9 months, 2 weeks ago

I went to the National Education Policy Center website read a number of the articles there, followed up on some of the links, it does seem fairly clear this "Think Tank" is in the NEAs' pocket. So while I can't say one way or the other if online charter schooling is effective, this is NOT a credible source to use for any unbiased determination. Sorry the Pilot staff gets a bogey on this one.

0
Comments No Longer Accepted
Pinestraw Magazine