Tyler’s Ridge On 'Go': Legal Attempt Fails to Sidetrack Plans
The Tyler's Ridge site is located across the roundabout from the Moore County Airport on the corner of N.C. 22 and Airport Road. Photo by Glenn M. Sides
- Print print this page
- Discuss 11 comments, Blog about
Advertisement
Despite a last-minute legal attempt to stop Tyler’s Ridge at Sandhills, developer Jim O’Malley is proceeding with plans to break ground on the controversial mixed-use project by the end of the year.
“I’m moving ahead. I’m working on bidding it out right now,” O’Malley said Thursday. “My goal is to have apartments ready for the fall 2012 semester.”
O’Malley was bolstered Sept. 8 when the N.C. Environmental Manage-ment Commission (EMC) voted 13-0 against a proposed declaratory ruling submitted by Southern Pines attorney Marsh Smith on behalf of Esther Frye, an adjacent landowner, and the Moore County Wildlife and Conservation Club.
Frye and the club asked the EMC to declare that all of the project’s 46.2 acres fall under the town’s 5/70 allocation rather than just the 11.54 acres that makeup the commercial portion.
A 5/70 allocation is an option that allows local governments in North Carolina to have higher density development within a limited portion of a water supply watershed.
“If the commission had ruled in our favor, then Tyler’s Ridge would not have been able to qualify for its conditional use permit (CUP) using only 11.54 acres of 5/70 allocation,” Smith said.
Tyler’s Ridge will include a commercial development on the north side, featuring small shops and a restaurant. A multifamily development on the south side includes 216 one- and two-bedroom dwelling units. In between, there will be three single-family lots.
The Southern Pines Town Council voted 4-1 in July to approve the project, planned at the corner of N.C. 22 and Airport Road.
Last week, Smith filed a “petition to reconsider” with the EMC.
“I write to call your attention to an error of law and to ask that the commission reconsider the matter on a narrow, but decisive, point,” he said in an email to the EMC.
Smith argues that Southern Pines tailored the use of its 5/70 allocation to apply only to the densest areas of Tyler’s Ridge. He claims that state law requires local governments to minimize the density of built-upon area.
“By minimizing the use of its 5/70 allocation, Southern Pines has unwittingly maximized the density of impervious surface in such areas,” he said Friday. “Southern Pines has 150 acres of 5/70 allocation remaining. By disregarding the language of the law, the town will eventually cover 100 acres with asphalt, shingles and other impervious surfaces instead of approximately 50 acres.
“Doubling the impervious surface doubles the impact to water quality in nearby Mill Creek.”
Town Manager Reagan Parsons said the town “acted in good faith” throughout the approval process for Tyler’s Ridge.
“The town defended its position before the EMC. It is our belief that we were in full compliance with state regulations,” Parsons said.
The Tyler’s Ridge property is zoned Planned Development (PD) and is on the west side of N.C. 22 between Airport Road and Aiken Road and across from Warrior Woods Road. The site also adjoins property owned by Sandhills Community College and Frye.
Opposition to the project centered around safety concerns, aircraft noise, an alleged glut of apartments in Southern Pines, current commercial space vacancies in Moore County and the project’s proximity to the Sandhills Horticultural Gardens.
FAA standards prohibit the construction of any structure that would encourage public assembly in a runway protection zone (RPZ), areas that extend beyond the edge of a runway.
RPZs are trapezoidal zones that have specific land-use regulations to keep runways clear of any obstacles that could hinder takeoff and landing. They begin 200 feet beyond that area usable for takeoff and landing.
The airport is seeking federal funds for expansions that include an extension of the airport’s main runway 600 feet toward N.C. 22 and 400 feet toward Hardee Lane in Whispering Pines.
The commercial portion of the project and three single-family lots would be in the airport hazard overlay zone, but the multifamily residential portion would not.
However, part of the multifamily residential portion is under the eventual departure path for planes coming off the main runway once the expansion is complete.
More like this story
Advertisement















Comments
OldPilot 1 year, 8 months ago
A triumph of developers money and politicians over common sense, quality of life, economic reality and welfare of the public; after all, airplanes never crash, just two in the last three days, and never near airports!
TooHot 1 year, 8 months ago
Give it a rest.
LifetimeResident 1 year, 8 months ago
The statement that developers triumphed over economic reality would lead me to believe that OldPilot doesn't think that the project is economically feasible because there is not adequated demand for the type of product that is planned. I'm fairly certain that if there was much doubt that the multifamily project was not economically feasible then this multimillion dollar project would not have been funded in one of the most difficult times to obtain financing. I guess we will have to wait and see what the true economic reality is, but I would bet there is evidence of the demand. The occupancy rate will ultimately determine what the economic reality is in the area for the multifamily aspect of the project.
OldPilot 1 year, 8 months ago
There is a substantial amount of empty retail space available in the immediate area of the project as well as elsewhere in Southern Pines & Pinehurst. There is plenty of rental housing available in the area as well. The three single family homes crammed into the plan to make it supposedly comply with Southern Pines ordinance will never be built given the number of single family homes available in the area...plus who would want to buy a single family home jammed between a bunch of apartments and a "retail" area. The developer himself has refused to commit to ever building the single family homes, or the retail space for that matter. The whole thing is nothing but a ploy to build housing near and for the junior college, the retail area and single family homes will never be built, the developer will build the apartments, dump it for a profit and who know what will be built when someone else buys the rest of the land and wants to build who knows what.
Bflat 1 year, 8 months ago
Maybe those 3 houses will be rentals. ;-)
theonewithsense 1 year, 8 months ago
I like the plane in the picture
Bflat 1 year, 8 months ago
Me too. The runway is going to be expanded in both directions for all the air traffic that is going to be coming in for the golf tournaments.
Courseaire 1 year, 8 months ago
That's Esther Frye leaving town.
dlb 1 year, 8 months ago
Student housing for a community college? What a novel idea? Could this be the start of a trend?
OldPilot 1 year, 8 months ago
One would hope not given it's location.... plus the whole thing is a scam. The retail space will never be built, nor will the three single family houses. Anyone who thinks either will ever become a reality is kidding themselves, stupid, or has an investment in the project. What it will produce is endless complaining about noise, a major safety issue for the airport, and endless environmental issues. But then again airplanes never have a problem much less near an airport because "we don't know when or where the next crash will occur"...a direct quote from one of the less enlightened (dumb as a brick) on the Southern Pines Council. I'm sure the 10 (so far) folks killed at Reno and the one at Martinsburg, WV would agree...accidents never happen, except when they do, and certainly never at or near an airport, except when they do.. It's democracy at it's best, developer dollars and paid for politicians trump public health, safety, welfare and good sense every time.
TooHot 1 year, 8 months ago
C'mon OldPilot.....that's enough.