Room Tax Funds OK'd for Airport

Advertisement

With legislative concurrence, Moore County will soon have a source of local match funding for two major capital improvements at the airport.

On a 4-1 vote, the Moore County Board of Commissioners on Tuesday night approved a resolution and interlocal cooperation agreement enabling the county to use 7 percent of the 3 percent room occupancy tax for that purpose.

Commissioner Tim Lea, who cast the dissenting vote, wanted the agreement to charge an interest fee on the airport payback of the money transferred from tourism promotion coffers.

“This is money being borrowed from the taxpayers,” Lea said.

But Board Chairman Nick Picerno argued that if interest were added to the agreement, it would still be paid by taxpayers.

“The more we discuss this issue, the more complicated it gets,” said Picerno in reference to the various parties involved in the agreement.

Before the local legislation could be introduced, the proposal needed action by the Convention and Visitors Bureau, the Moore County Airport Authority and the county commissioners.

Now, final approval is dependent upon the legislature’s vote on House Bill 545, which revises the room occupancy tax legislation. State Rep. Jamie Boles introduced the bill at the board’s request. (The N.C. General Assembly website reveals that the bill has been ratified by both legislative chambers).

Other commissioners agreed with Picerno’s point of view.

“The Moore County taxpayers own the airport,” Commissioner Craig Kennedy said. “It’s lending taxpayers’ money to the taxpayers.”

Commissioner Larry Caddell said the Board of Education holds title to school property, but in this case the county holds title to the airport property.

“We own it,” Caddell said. “It’s ours.”

Caddell made the motion to approve the agreement, with Kennedy offering the second. Lea made an amended motion calling for a 2 percent interest rate, but the motion died for lack of a second.

Caleb Miles, president and CEO of the Convention and Visitors Bureau, advised prudent investment if the tax collections sit in the (airport) account for a number of years.

The special 3 percent tax, enacted in 1987, is levied on lodging rooms rented in Moore County, in addition to sales taxes.

Collections are used to promote travel and tourism in the county. The program is administered by a board composed of locally appointed individuals, including one county commissioner.

Revision of the bill specifies that room tax collections may also be applied to tourism-related expenditures.

The resolution drafted by County Attorney Misty Leland and adopted by the commissioners says that “the airport falls under the umbrella of travel and tourism.” It specifies that apron and runway expansion and safety projects may be funded by a portion of these tax collections.

Under the revision, the county will retain 7 percent of the overall 3 percent collected in room occupancy taxes, the retained funds to be used to reimburse the county for the local match to draw down state grants for the airport.

Much of the money awarded by the N.C. Department of Transportation (NCDOT) comes from the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA grants require a 10 percent match, split between state and local governments.

In February, the county agreed to a local appropriation of $250,000 as its match for NCDOT funding for airfield improvements, including an apron expansion.

However, the low bid for the project came in under budget at $2,069,989.69, reducing the local match to $231,000.

The airport authority is expected to ask the county for another match for a runway expansion and safety project, estimated to cost $800,000 to $900,000. The grant for this project has not been approved by the state. If the grant is not received, then the county will not seek this reimbursement from the room tax.

At a planning retreat several months ago, airport authority members and administrative officials advised the commissioners that several costly improvements are needed if the airport is to accommodate the heavy influx of visitors expected for the back to back U.S. Open tournaments in 2014.

Airport profits have been lean in recent years because of the recession, and the airport does not have funds to cover the local match. Rather than take the match from property tax payments, the commissioners decided to divert part of the room tax collections to the airport under the theory that the airport is a viable tool of the tourism industry in Moore County.

Contact Florence Gilkeson at florence@thepilot.com.

Advertisement

Comments

TeamRhinoLLC 1 year, 11 months ago

So we are investing our existing revenue into another source...seems simple enough. I believe the question that has to be answered is: Will that source (the airport) generate enough revenue to exceed the investment? I obviously do not know what percentage of visitors, whom stay at hotels in the county, arrive via our airport but I imagine the percentage is pretty low considering how close we are to the RDU hub. It seems a significant challenge to expect a drastic increase in hotel stays based upon runway improvement; particularly with the price of fuel and subsequent rising airline costs.

0

OldPilot 1 year, 11 months ago

Please spend time at the airport, particularly Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays. Not a day goes by that golfers don't arrive and depart in smaller personal aircraft, charter turboprops and bizness jets. 3% of the 7% room tax paid by visitors, not locals, to fund matching dollar requirements to secure grants is a pittance, the match dollars would be allocated in any event no matter what the source, so a stable source of match dollar funding is an excellent and prudent idea. This idea makes very good sense, so much so it's amazing it has gotten this far. Hopefully it will be implimented.

0

TeamRhinoLLC 1 year, 11 months ago

Well I don't think I am going to hang out at the airport anytime soon just to watch people come and go lol. I understand the purpose, I am just not clear on how it is going to increase hotel tax revenue and by how much. I know that it is a long-term plan (10 years I think I heard). I imagine there is is documentation somewhere it is just a matter of looking for it. As stated in the article, profits have been lean in recent years I for one have not seen any indication that there is going to be a change any time soon. Thank you for sharing your view on the topic.

0

old_school00 1 year, 11 months ago

When, I worked at the airport in 2005 this place was non stop with traffic. After, the U.S. Open came traffic remained heavy with golfers who chartered larger aircrafts to accomadate groups, usually Thursday through Sunday. However, as I continued to work there air traffic slowly declined. Most of of the traffic, which they report that land are student pilots and military doing touch and goes. They don't stop and buy fuel! If you really are curious to what type of aircrafts land at the airport without having to check it out research it. Check out www.flightaware.com and in the left hand corner type in SOP that is Moore County's airport identifier. Here you will be able to look at the arrivals and departures and click for example in highlighted in blue GLF 5, which is the type of aircraft. I will bet you that most aircrafts are small single engines and not large aircrafts. The only reason I can see a need for money for the runway and ramp expansion would be due to the simple fact of the heavy traffic when the U.S. Open returns. After that it will be a ghost town, once again.

0

OldPilot 1 year, 11 months ago

old_school100 obviously hasn't been spending any time at the airport. Just as well...

0

old_school00 1 year, 11 months ago

I believe working there for five years qualifies me enough to speak on the amount and size aircrafts this airport handles daily. Also, I know a lot of what goes on behind the scenes. I'm all for promoting tourism. I think it's a great idea! I'm simply stating that the airport in my opinion is not a very good source. I can tell you this, I logged into flightaware and looked at the amount of traffic and the MAJORITY were folks that are based at the FBO all piloting small aircrafts. As for the other aircrafts landing and departing I counted less than 15 and they are small jets very cabable of landing on a 5000 foot runway. To me that's not a great amount of traffic in or out of the airport. Plus, of those 15 not BASED at Moore County. I recognize the tail numbers and I know that these folks only come to Pinehurst to visit family, or are picking up, some are here for business. If I can be of anymore assistance feel free to ask me or quiz me. Give me a tail number and I will tell you who owns and operates that aircraft with my prior knowledge.

0
Comments No Longer Accepted
Pinestraw Magazine