Another Justified Veto by Governor

Advertisement

Conservative Republicans used to be the ones always worried about Big Brother government meddling in people’s personal lives.

We were surprised, then (or maybe not), when the newly dominant GOP majority in the North Carolina General Assembly passed legislation requiring that government thrust its cold and clammy hands into the most personal decision a woman can make: whether to have a baby.

Good for Gov. Beverly Perdue for vetoing this offensive piece of legislation, which represents nothing but a blatant and ham-handed — and anything but conservative — attempt to impose one faction’s political philosophy on everybody else.

Specifically, the measure (thoughtfully titled “the Woman’s Right to Know Act”) insultingly forces doctors to show any woman seeking an ­abortion an ultrasound of her fetus while describing the images in specific detail. The woman would also be required to wait for 24 hours after this state-prescribed medical lecture before going ahead with the medical procedure.

Plenty of Ironies

The ironies run pretty deep here. After all, how many times have we heard Republicans at tea party rallies here and elsewhere rail against “Obamacare” on the grounds that it supposedly represents an outrageous attempt to interpose government into what should be the sacred private relationship between an individual American and his or her physician?

That was then and there, apparently. This is now and here, so black suddenly becomes white and up becomes down.

Another striking irony: N.C. lawmakers also passed a bill cutting off state funding support to Planned Parenthood clinics. But that move threatens to curtail pregnancy prevention programs and family planning counseling, especially to the poor — thus depriving them of services that can help reduce the need for abortions in the first place.

The bill sets forth in detail a sort of script that physicians must follow in talking with a patient before she can be considered sufficiently informed to make up her own mind — with no exceptions made even in cases of forcible rape These provisions treat the doctor like a robot and the patient like a child, coming across as downright creepy.

‘Ideological Agenda’

Terminating a pregnancy is a momentous and painful decision that should never be undertaken lightly and should be avoided whenever possible. But it is a decision that should be made by a woman and her doctor, and government needs to butt out.

Perdue, in inking up her veto stamp yet again (she has wielded it so many times lately that she must be suffering carpal tunnel syndrome by now), called the bill a “dangerous intrusion” into that confidential doctor-patient relationship. She added: “Physicians must be free to advise and treat their patients based on their medical knowledge and expertise and not have their advice overridden by elected officials seeking to impose their own ideological agenda on others.” Exactly.

Perdue has to know that the opposition will waste no time making political hay out of her action — which will no doubt include labeling her (ridiculously) as “pro-abortion.” A concerted effort will certainly be made to override her veto, and it may succeed. But at least she can rest in the knowledge that she did the right thing for the right reasons.

Advertisement

Comments

MikeNC 1 year, 10 months ago

Where does the bulk of Planned Parenthoods revenue come from? ABORTIONS ! How do you feel about botched abortions and live fetuses being thrown into the garbage can and doctors not allowed to give a shot to the aborted fetus in the garbage can to take away it's agony? And where are the babies rights in your argument? Basic human rights listed in the Constitution, are not only for those who are able to speak, but also for those, who can not !!!!!!!!!!! Diane

0

Arestorer 1 year, 10 months ago

The Babies are not having Mothers, the Mothers are having the Babies...How about the rights of people already breathing??

0

Arestorer 1 year, 10 months ago

I've tried to get retro-active abortions legalized....Did'nt go over very good...Was told it was'nt really an abortion once their breathing...:)

0

handyssc2 1 year, 10 months ago

The majority of Planned Parenthood's revenue is derived from education grants and clinic services for family planning. All Planned Parenthoods do NOT perform abortions. And abortion services revenue makes up only a fraction of their budgets. Believe it or not, a segment of their sex education program is devoted to educating seniors, especially widows and widowers, who believe that AIDS and STD's are diseases of the young and promiscuous and think they are immune from transmission. If people would take the time to educate themselves about the organization, they would learn that Planned Parenthood saves lives. It is the single health organization that low income women have access to (affordability) that requires that they have a pap smear before providing them with birth control. That screening alone saves countless lives by detecting cervical cancer and harmful STD's like HPV early.

0

JimHeim 1 year, 10 months ago

When 3% becomes "the bulk of Planned Parenthoods revenue" you will be correct. Until then, there is not a word of truth in this assertion.

0

dustyrhoades 1 year, 10 months ago

So-called "conservatives" talk about "freedom" they're not talking about freedom for you. When they talk about "limited governmental regulations" they're not talking about regulations on individuals.

0

TreadLightly 1 year, 10 months ago

Skeleton and muscles of a human. Wakes and sleeps like a human. Kicks dad at night. (At least mine did.). Who protects those too young or weak to defend themselves? Formerly their life was protected by the legal system.

All I know is that if you abort it, no emotion over "unviable tissue." If it was a miscarriage, extreme sorrow because "Our baby is dead."

OR, from another "editoral." "...endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

 That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men..."

That ONE AND ONLY POSSIBLE right of a fetus--INHERITANCE-- could stand legal protection!

0

Bigguy 1 year, 10 months ago

My wife and I took a friend to Planned Parenthood in Fayetteville, not for a abortion. The person was poor,no insurance whatsoever, spoke little English, was here legally. They gave her proper medical treatment and even helped her find another doctor who could help out a charity case. The people protesting outside did not care why we there, but still found it there right to belittle us for being there. I don't think it's right to have to explain ourselves when going to get medical treatment to anybody other than our physician. I am not "pro abortion" but I do not have the right to tell anyone that they have to go ahead with a pregnancy.

0

theonewithsense 1 year, 10 months ago

I agree abortions should be legal until the baby pops out. Kill it a day before it is born it you don't want it, maybe two days. It doesn't really matter, it's not a baby yet.

0

armytrucker 1 year, 10 months ago

So what is it then???

0

theonewithsense 1 year, 10 months ago

an aborted fetus that is nobody's concern but the doctor and the pregnant woman

0

irkim13 1 year, 10 months ago

Do you have kids? FYI Fetus is Latin for Baby

0

honesty2 1 year, 10 months ago

Guess you've never seen a live ultrasound of a fetus in the womb. They actually move, suck a thumb, hiccup, respond to noise (including the mother's voice), etc.

0

MikeNC 1 year, 10 months ago

Arestorer, so you agree, then, that babies are people, as you stated. Good thing, huh, that your mother didn't decide it was more important for her to breath than you. Diane

0

irkim13 1 year, 10 months ago

So ignorance is bliss, better the woman not know what she is torturing and killing, just make sure she continues to think it is some foreign substance, a glob of tissue, definitly not what it is, a human baby deserving of the same rights all Americans have including the right to life.
I thought one of the Government's primary jobs was to protect it's citizens and ensure there right to life, only if they are old enough I guess.
Funny the same folks who are against the death penalty for a murderer or rapist, etc or against the "torture" of terrorists have no problem, actually defend and embrace a mothers "right" to have her defenseless baby truly tortured and murdered. How ironic.

0

buddysmith 1 year, 10 months ago

i feel this is a topic that there is no right or wrong answer. depends on who you are and what position you have! if there is still an america 500 years from now abortion will still be a hot topic!

0

armytrucker 1 year, 10 months ago

Maybe ole Perdue Turkey should spend more time trying to fund special education and less time trying to kill children. She worries more about helping to kill unborn children than taking care of the ones here now needing help the most.

0

MikeNC 1 year, 10 months ago

while it may still be a "hot topic". The truth is, in recent polls, more and more people are AGAINST abortion, than are for it. This "hot topic" also is a very defining distinction between liberals and conservatives. Let me put it this way: Approximately three years ago, the Pilot took a picture of several little puppies that were tossed into dumpsters at the landfill. The public (to include me, as I as I was a sworn in animal cruelty investigator for almost four years in Arkansas) were outraged that a person could be so cruel. Well, this outrage also holds true for me, when fetuses are tossed into the trash can at the abortion clinics. And if you're an Obama supporter, than most likely, you agree with him, that some of the abortions that are botched and thrown into the garbage can while they are still alive, should be allowed to die a horrible death, with no intervention from the doctors. Obama's stance was, for a doctor to intervene, would undermise the woman's decision to have the abortion. It's pretty easy, what's right is right, what's wrong, is well... wrong. Diane

0

sgmartin 1 year, 10 months ago

Gee Diane thanks for simplifying a complex issue. And of course before Roe v Wade there were no such things as abortion right? That wasn't invented until 1972.

1

DaveyNC 1 year, 10 months ago

Sorry, Perdue did the right thing here. This bill constituted an intrusion into the doctor/patient relationship, a place that the state has no business being, just as the government has no place in dictating any other aspect of our health care.

This is a decision best left to the mother, the father (all too often left out of this discussion), their families and their doctor.

0

walter68 1 year, 10 months ago

good job Perdue!! It isn't anyones business if you want a child or not!! but you, your doctor and God. If men would were condoms there wouldn't be a "problem" but oh no, and what if your raped!! , men are just clueless, so bring an unwanted child in to the world??? no one to love and cherish him or her?? then people go to russia and other countries to adopt!

0

irkim13 1 year, 10 months ago

Yea better to torture and kill it instead. Right, punish the child.

0
Comments No Longer Accepted
Pinestraw Magazine