Gun in Haddock Case Remains in Evidence

Advertisement

The gun that killed 12-year-old Emily Haddock won’t be kept out of evidence. Perry Ross Schiro is on trial as an accessory after the fact to murder, accused of hiding the .22 caliber semi-automatic handgun that took her life.

Michael Currie is already serving a life sentence for shooting and killing the girl during a Sept. 21, 2007 home invasion. Haddock was home from school with strep throat. Her grandfather found her body. Currie is expected to testify in this case, one condition of a plea bargain preventing a possible death penalty had he gone to trial.

Defense attorney Richard Roose sought to keep the weapon out of evidence. He filed a motion to suppress contending it had been improperly seized.

District Attorney Maureen Krueger called Harnett and Moore county detectives to the stand to testify about Schiro’s Sept. 24 arrest where they found the gun inside a sock hidden behind paneling in the trunk of a green Cadillac he’d been driving.

Roose told Senior Resident Superior Court Judge James M. Webb that current law bars anything discovered in incident-to-arrest searches where the accused is already under arrest and secured. According to Roose, a 2009 Supreme Court ruling in Arizona v. Grant means nothing found unrelated to the stolen tag could be used.

Officers testified that Schiro gave permission to search that car trunk, and arranged for the Cadillac’s car keys to be brought out and given to investigators.

Webb, following a lengthy list of findings of facts and law, denied the defense motion to suppress. Roose will appeal his ruling. The hearing took most of the day Wednesday after two alternate jurors had been seated to complete the jury panel.

Opening arguments were to start Thursday morning, with the trial now expected to run into next week. Webb, originally slated to take the bench Monday in Guilford County as circuit judge for six months, will have to remain in Carthage for the duration of this trial.

Advertisement

Comments

theonewithsense 2 years, 4 months ago

Roose is a stand up guy. Since it is a fact that his client is guilty, his only option is to find a technicality to get him off or reduce his sentence. What a great system we have.

0

MisterG 2 years, 4 months ago

A fact eh? Good to know "innocent until proven guilty" no longer exists. Though I am pleasantly surprised to see a comment by you that's not about race for a change.

0

theonewithsense 2 years, 4 months ago

yes it is a fact that Emily was killed. Yes it is a fact that Schiro was involved with the murder. Yes it is a fact that the murder weapon was found in Schiro's Caddilac. The scumbag lawyers argument is that the fact that the gun was found should not be allowed in court because of a technicality that is was improperly seized. Those are all facts.

He gets his day in court, but that does not mean he is innocent until proven guilty. He may be innocent until proven guilty in the court of law, but he is either innocent or he is guilty. I hope for my children's sake and everyone else's that this punk never walks the streets again.

0

MisterG 2 years, 4 months ago

"Scumbag lawyer" eh? Welp, I guess we'll file "right to an attorney" with the other constitutional protections you apparently despise.

0

marcus0211 2 years, 4 months ago

So its fact that Perry Schiro is guilty? How do you know its a fact the one with no sense. You want to believe he is guilty but you know as much as the next guy. Not a damn thing. It is fact that he recieved the gun that was used in the murder, but is it really fact that he knew what the gun was used for prior to him recieving it. The other guy who was facing the death penalty needed an out and they gave him one in order to put more people behind bars. Do you think its impossible for him to lie so he can live? um i think so... In fact i know so.

0
Comments No Longer Accepted
Pinestraw Magazine