Obama Pushes His Non-Budget
- Print print this page
- Discuss 7 comments, Blog about
Advertisement
Those in the tax-and-spend crowd just don’t get it. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, they still insist that raising taxes is the only way to solve the government’s insurmountable debt.
According to Internal Revenue Service data, the entire taxable income of everyone earning more than $100,000 in 2008 was about $1.582 trillion. Even if all these Americans — most of whom are far from wealthy — were taxed at 100 percent, it wouldn’t cover Mr. Obama’s deficit for this year. President Obama knows this, but he also knows that threats to sock it to the rich gain votes from those on the take.
This was evidenced in President Obama’s latest non-speech about his non-budget. Like all of his speeches, this one was designed to garner votes. Period. It was simply another campaign speech, which will undoubtedly sway some half-listeners into bobbing heads in agreement as he rips into the Ryan plan.
But, despite the appearance of being a strong leader (“As long as I am president, this won’t happen,” etc.), it was simply more mendacious hyperbole — pure air. No amount of figurative banging on the table will substitute for real leadership.
More evidence of campaigning: He accuses the Ryan plan of throwing Grandma under the bus when nothing in that plan affects seniors over 55. Obama knows this as well, but scare tactics are part of his game plan to get senior votes. (This senior citizen won’t fall for it.)
I believe in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, but not when I see TV ads of lawyers seeking a piece of the action by boasting how they can get disability Social Security even if the claims are suspect. Not when I see TV ads touting highly priced power chairs for free. Not when I see deadbeats out to beat the system at the expense of the taxpayer.
When will the president admit that the only way out of our horrendous fiscal dilemma is to forget politics and vote-getting for five minutes and attack the real enemies of solvency: overbloated government; out-of-control spending; waste and fraud in entitlements and even some of the core obligations of the entitlements themselves.
Medicaid is not an entitlement. It is a form of welfare first conceived in 1965 and is managed by the states. But state participation is voluntary, and states take a variety of approaches to its administration. The result is a wide-open door to abuse and fraud. An honest budget approach would recognize this and address it.
Medicaid is needed but should join Social Security and Medicare as objects of fiscal restraint. Medicaid is not available to everyone, nor should Social Security be automatically handed to everyone. Please don’t say, “It’s our money.” Workers pay into Social Security to take care of those collecting it. That’s getting tougher as more and more people go on it and live longer and longer.
Most of the young people I know think they will never see a Social Security dime, but this need not be the case if a better plan is added to means testing. Neither, however, will come from this administration. As for Medicaid, I read recently that the projection in 10 years is for 100 million people to be covered. Does anyone really think that Obamacare will fix that?
There are now so many people working for the government that they have to invent things to do. Meddling serves that purpose. A pack of bureaucrats recently descended on the health clinic I use and changed things around so that doctors, nurses and patients waste a lot of valuable time undoing what worked well before the invasion. All of this under the guise of protecting our privacy. This from a government that can’t even spell the word.
All of this is simply an advanced form of Chicago politics. President Obama is a past master of these shenanigans. But this nation, founded by the Jeffersons and Washingtons who gave us liberty, deserves better.
Allan Jefferys, a former New York theater critic and newsman, lives in Pinehurst. Contact him at oldjeff@nc.rr.com.
More like this story
Advertisement














Comments
Easygoing 2 years ago
New news, Allan Jeffreys writes an editorial ranting on and expressing his hatred for President Obama. No real facts or suggestions, just more Blah, Blah, Blah. Ridiculous that the Pilot uses the space for this angry old man.
ProudYankee 2 years ago
Mr. Jeffreys, by Jeffersons and Washingtons, do you really mean "old white guys"? Is this the real problem you have with Obama?
Darkwing 2 years ago
Smokescreen, ProudYankee? I couldn't care less what his skin color is, he's still wrong.
BigE 2 years ago
Economists on both sides of the political spectrum agree that tax revenues must be increased as part of the solution. Since the bottom 80% of households in this country possess less than 14% of the wealth you really do not have much of a choice on where to get the money, do you? Oh, and while we are ignoring the facts, how about this one via Justin Fox - "So [government] spending [in 2010] was $186 billion higher than if we'd stuck to the [2000-2007] trend, and revenue was $681 billion lower. In other words, the giant deficit is mainly the result of the collapse in tax receipts brought on by the recession, not the increase in spending. Nice to know, huh?" I know, psychiatrists say we do not let data get in the way of our previously held beliefs but come on! If you are going to biatch about your President at least do it with some intelligence.
moonchild7 2 years ago
Of course. Just like Trump talking about how he gets along with "THE BLACKS." Trump is walking a very thin line with his continued attack of President Obama regarding his Birth Certificate and College Transcripts. Saying that Obama has a NON-BUDGET is more of that "He's not one of us" mentality that's really hiding racist beliefs.
leftfield 2 years ago
"When will the president admit that the only way out of our horrendous fiscal dilemma is to forget politics and vote-getting for five minutes and attack the real enemies of solvency: overbloated government; out-of-control spending; waste and fraud in entitlements and even some of the core obligations of the entitlements themselves"
Let us not forget defense. I'm all for trimming these things you mentioned but you have to put the bloated defense budget on the table.