North West Bonds Extended
- Print print this page
- Discuss 8 comments, Blog about
Advertisement
Moore County has an additional three years to develop a public water system for the northwestern part of the county.
An April 19 action by the board of commissioners means that the May 2004 referendum authorizing $16 million in bonds for the North West Moore Water District is extended until 2014.
The public hearing on April 19 attracted only one speaker, Doug Middaugh, of Pinehurst, who voiced opposition to use of the bonds for any purpose other than the original intention of the bond issue.
Middaugh said he supports a water district for North West Moore and any secondary service that would extend water lines to Seven Lakes. However, the original intent was to establish a water district within the Ritter, Bensalem, Deep River and Sheffield townships, and he said “that intent now appears to be drastically changed.”
He was referring to recently mentioned proposals to serve Seven Lakes by running water lines from the North West Moore Water District if and when the district is formed. The bond referendum approved by district voters in 2004 authorizes the county to issue up to $16 million in bonds to build the water system.
The original intention was to set up a water district in those townships similar to the successful East Moore Water District, now in its third phase of development.
As was the case in East Moore, the county was to apply for low-interest loans from the rural development unit of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to pay for construction. The debt would be paid off through user fees.
Unlike East Moore, the residents of North West Moore did not respond in large enough numbers for the district to get off the ground. The bond authority from the 2004 referendum would have expired in May without an extension of the referendum issue.
Before calling the hearing, the county secured approval for the extension from the Local Government Commission.
The county is considering options for enhancing water service to Seven Lakes, which is part of the county utility system. One idea would allow the North West Moore district to serve Seven Lakes, the county’s largest residential development.
Nevertheless, the hearing focused entirely on extension of the bonds authorized in the 2004 referendum.
“All we’re doing is extending the original bond order from the referendum,” Commissioner Tim Lea said before the board took its unanimous vote. “No other action is involved.”
In other business, the commissioners agreed to revise the public utilities project ordinance covering $9.2 million in improvements in Pinehurst.
Public Works Director Dennis Brobst said the revision was needed because the Old Town sewer rehabilitation and Lake Pinehurst sewer rehabilitation projects are being combined for auditing purposes. He said that one engineering contract will be awarded for both projects and once bids are received and reviewed, one construction contract will be awarded.
The Old Town and Lake Pinehurst sewer improvements are among four projects covered in the county’s issuance of limited obligation bonds in 2010.
The other projects are construction of a water tank and purchase of radio read meters. The bonds will be paid off by Pinehurst utility customers.
Although these bonds are part of an overall issuance approved last year by the board, they are separate from the $32 million in bonds issued to pay for a public safety-detention center complex in Carthage, to be paid off by county taxpayers.
The commissioners voted 4-1 not to dissolve the Government Center Committee appointed in 2008 to advise the commissioners about a county government office building.
Lea’s motion to dissolve the committee failed for lack of a second. Commissioner Jimmy Melton made the motion to leave the committee in place, and Commissioner Craig Kennedy made the second. Lea cast the dissenting vote on the final motion.
Lea argued that the board has voted not to place the office building on the same tract with the public safety-detention center and thus the committee is not needed at this time. He said the board could appoint a new committee when the time comes to plan the office facility.
Melton said the same purpose would be served by retaining the present committee.
The commissioners agreed to call a public hearing for the May 3 meeting to receive comment on the Targeted Transit Assistance Program grant application. The grant is sought by Moore County Transportation Services.
Contact Florence Gilkeson at florence@thepilot.com.
More like this story
Advertisement














Comments
Zoey 2 years ago
Thank you, Doug Middaugh!! It seems the BOC needs a constant thorn in their side to keep them from straying (futile, as it may appear).The public knows the BOC's attention/intention is not really on the Ritter, Bensalem, Deep River and Sheffield townships,but on the NW portion of Mineral Springs. The BOC is hellbent on getting water to ? hmmm....
. "if and when the district is formed."
That reminds me, how's the negotiations with Robbins going? lmao
difflook 2 years ago
Im glad the Commissioners who are involved with the Northwestmoore Water District is committed to providing water to all areas of Northern Moore County, it is just a great addition to be able to include the Seven Lakes area to this, and thus if Robbins joins in, which it should, Moore County can be providing water to those areas from water within its own County. Why is is a laugh about the Robbins negotiations??
Zoey 2 years ago
"Why is is a laugh about the Robbins negotiations??"
Not to be repetitious, please refer to this article's comments.. http://www.thepilot.com/news/2011/apr...
That should sum it up...
ncsnafu1 2 years ago
The Moore County Commissioners are attempting to creat a charade with their newly proposed NMWD. The original 2004 district plan was to install a water line distribution network in the Northern part of the county whereas the current plan(s) make no mention of the network but rather propose a new treatment plant at Robbins with a supply line to Seven Lakes. Forgotten in the current planning is the initially proposed distribution network which begs the question - How can there be a NMWD without the distribution network?
Everyone needs to realize that the current planning first benefits Robbins, assuming they agree to the plan which is doubtful given their history of demanding control, and second, provides a much needed secondary supply to Seven Lakes. Apparently left out of the plan are the very folks that the inital plan was developed to supply - North Moore County which would include Commissioner Kennedy!
The current plan is being done for one reason and one reason only - to take advantage of the approved $16M bond. Forgotten is the fact that the new usage of the bond was never proposed when it was approved and that the expense is was intended pay for will still remain making it necessary that a second bond be approved for the forgetten network or user rates increased dramatically to pay the cost.
Zoey 2 years ago
40 years in the hole.....
difflook 2 years ago
I think I d rather have water and pay for it, even if for 40 years, and provide for the future, rather than not having any when another drought causes a shortage. And don't you think that you have to start somewhere with the extension of the lines? East Moore wasnt done all at one time, I hope Robbins does make an agreement with Moore County, other wise how will the small number of reisdents payoff that excessive debt on the sewer plant??
Zoey 2 years ago
Pipe Dreams.... (pun intended)
"Shortage", glad you brought that up. Do you think with our current water situation, in 40 years (with over-development and contaminated water sources) our water regulations and laws won't change? At the rate that we're destroying our environment, a 2 dollar gallon of water will be, what, 20-30 bucks? Personally in 40 years, I think the Fed will own All water sources....
difflook 2 years ago
They might who knows, but if we think they will as you say, would it not be prudent to PLAN and take action for the future? Not sit and wait to see what happens?