It's OK Now to Call the President Hitler
- Print print this page
- Discuss 59 comments, Blog about
Advertisement
I’m old enough to remember a time long, long ago when it was absolutely the worst thing you could do to compare the president of the United States to Adolf Hitler. And by “long, long ago,” I mean 2004.
That’s the year that the liberal website Moveon.org sponsored a contest for homemade political campaign ads. One of the contest entries featured quotes from George Dubbya Bush to the effect that God had told him to strike the country’s enemies and that he was “taking steps to protect the homeland.”
These were superimposed over stock footage of Hitler speaking to cheering, swastika-waving crowds. It was crude, it was heavy-handed, it was over the top and unfair. It also was taken down off the website, and it didn’t make the cut for the first round of the competition.
Another ad said, “What were war crimes in 1945 is foreign policy in 2003.” The final two frames of that proposed ad included Hitler with his hand raised and then a shot of Bush with his hand up taking the oath of office. That one got pulled, too.
But that didn’t stop Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie from calling the ads “the worst and most vile form of political hate speech” and demanding that the Democratic candidates, none of whom had anything to do with the ads, “repudiate this pollution of our political process” by denouncing them.
It looks like the Republicans are still ultra-super-sensitive, in a “Princess and the Pea” kinda way, about being in any way even vaguely associated with Hitler or the Nazis.
When Vice President Joe Biden recently sent out a fundraising message saying there was going to be a “GOP blitzkrieg” of dirty campaign tactics, Republican lawmakers went verruckt (crazy). Despite the fact that “blitzkrieg” and its shortened form “blitz” have long since passed into common usage as an expression for any fast, overwhelming attack, the GOP claimed they were being compared to the invaders of Poland.
“Invoking the Nazis’ crimes against humanity in a political debate is simply inappropriate,” a spokesman for Minority Leader John Boehner said. But apparently it’s only “inappropriate” or “vile” if you’re a Democrat. As you know, the only principle the GOP has left is IOKIYAR (It’s OK If You’re a Republican), and comparing their political rivals to Nazis is, it seems, A-OK with them:
— Posters and placards of President Obama dressed as Hitler abound at tea party rallies.
— National Review Editor Jonah Goldberg wrote a notorious book entitled “Liberal Fascism.”
— Conservative columnist Thomas Sowell, writing about the $20 billion dollar relief fund paid by BP for the Gulf oil spill, directly compared the fund to laws passed by Germany’s Reichstag that gave Hitler “dictatorial powers.”
— On May 16 of this year, Republican elder statesman Newt Gingrich went on Fox News and asserted that “the secular socialist machine” (his buzzword for the currently elected government) “represents as great a threat to America as Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union ever did.”
Backed into a corner by host Chris Wallace, Gingrich said that he wasn’t really calling the administration Nazis, he was just saying they were as big a threat as the Nazis. You know, sort of like saying, “I’m not saying your sister’s a prostitute, I’m just saying she sleeps with a lot of guys for money.”
The biggest proponent of associating President Obama and ill-defined “liberals” as Nazis, however, is Glenn Beck. Pretty much any spokesman for the administration or its policies can expect at some point to be compared by Beck to Nazi propagandist Josef Goebbels.
He’s responded to critics of Fox News by invoking a famous poem about the Holocaust and directly comparing Fox to the Jews. (“When they’re done with Fox, and you decide to speak out on something. The old, ‘first they came for the Jews, and I wasn’t Jewish.”)
And the list goes on, with not a peep from the Republican leadership.
In the responses to this column, both in e-mail and in the online comments section, I tend to get some negative feedback for using terms like “wingnut.” Maybe I should become a Republican again. Then I can call people anything, up to and including Nazis, and no one will say a mumblin’ word.
Dusty Rhoades lives, writes and practices law in Carthage. Contact him at dustyr@nc.rr.com.
More like this story
Advertisement














Comments
nothingspecial 2 years, 10 months ago
You're right in saying that President bashing has gotten out of hand. Seems like it started during the Clinton years, then there was payback against Bush, and now there's payback against Obama.
In the midst of all that crap any objective criticism is also going to put everyone in automatic defense mode.
OldPilot 2 years, 10 months ago
This column is right on point and absolutely correct. Unfortunately using comparisons to Hitler, the Nazi era and the Holocaust extends beyond the political, even appearing in our own beloved home- town newspaper, The Pilot, in the form of a "cartoon". Horrors says you. Can't be. Say it isn't so. Well, just after the Gaza incident, on June 6, 2010, a "cartoon" appeared in The Pilot picturing a soldier, the complete and perfectly obvious image of a Wermacht/Waffin SS storm trooper complete with jackboots, coal scuttle helmet and smoking machine pistol, one gigantic jackboot crushing a group of tiny people holding a tiny peace sign, with a river of blood labeled "flotilla raid" flowing from beneath the jackboot. The tiny people were, or course, the Turkish "peace activists" who manned the flotilla, some of whom came armed and looking for a fight, which they got. So you might ask, why is a 1944 Nazi storm trooper crushing Hamas supporters in 2010? Hint #1: The Nazi storm trooper has a Star of David prominently displayed on the front of his coal scuttle helmet. Hint #2: The Star of David is the national symbol of Israel. No, it's not OK now, or ever, to call the President Hitler, nor is it OK, now or ever, to use such comparisons, in words or in pictures, to denigrate an entire religeon, country or society (except, apparently, when it's done as a matter of editorial policy by our beloved home-town newspaper).
JER 2 years, 10 months ago
steveital, steveitel, look deeply into your computer screen...look long and deeply as you study these words...continue to stare deeply into your screen....deeper and deeper...can you see the Faux News logo? Stare deeper and deeper until you see it. It is making you feel relaxed....do you feel how relaxing it is making you feel? Good...now go to your car, start it up and drive north to Raleigh. As you approach Raleigh from the south, you will see a hill...it is Dix Hill. Go to the hill. See the building....it is Dorothea Dix Hospital...they can help you there. Try on the white coat they will have waiting for you...it will look good on you.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
steve: a lot of people, Democratic and Republican, conservative, liberal and moderate, have contacted me or spoken to me about what goes on in the comments. They agree on some things, disagree on others, but one thing that they all agree on is that you're nuts.
coffecreme 2 years, 10 months ago
Hey chuck... I got your back on that one!
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
"you think that being a southern sleepy town lawyer puts you miles above the rest of us."
I expect his animus towards me, but this isn't the first time he's slammed my town.
Why the contempt for small towns, steve? Isn't that, I don't know, elitist?
blake 2 years, 10 months ago
I find this article a little weak. I will agree that one should not call President Obama Hitler. It was not appropriate against Bush nor is it now appropriate. What I failed too see were the examples of Obama being called Hitler. I cannot argue that a few misguided Tea Party participants committed this act. I will argue that these images did not "abound".
As to Jonah Goldberg's book (Copyright 2007), I do not think he called Obama Hitler since it predates his presidency. Newt Gingrich did not call the president Hitler. Calling his policies a larger threat to the survival of America than the greatest challenges of last century does not equate to Obama being Hitler. Obama is not Hitler, a better comparison is Carter.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
"I mean who is going around trying to call Obama Hitler anyway???"
http://www.radioiowa.com/2010/07/13/tea-party-billboard-in-mason-city-raises-concern/
(Note the billboard is now being papered over).
"As to Jonah Goldberg's book (Copyright 2007), I do not think he called Obama Hitler since it predates his presidency."
http://www.nationalreview.com/liberal-fascism/203383/notes-obama-liberal-fascism
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
http://niqnaq.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/swastikas.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/29frf7n
http://tinyurl.com/2fbxter
http://cockingasnook.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/hitler-obama-tea-party-2-in-1.jpg
http://jaxpolitics.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/duval-gop-in-controversy-over-obamahitler-comparisons-at-tea-party/
JER 2 years, 10 months ago
steveital: More people watched the Jerry Springer Show than watched Masterpiece Theater. So what's your point?
leftfield 2 years, 10 months ago
Steveital wrote " funny thing no one but Dusty is watching the other news shows anyway-about 4 or 5 people watch CNN and MSNBC put together-and left wing talk radio is a non starter ""
Steve, that's because we don't need to watch TV all day on one network listening to some jerkoff tell us how to think. I like Rachel Maddow and occasionally Olberman but I don't need them to tell me how to think. And I definitely do not need talking points like you so obviously do. Maybe you should put down the remote sometime and pick up a godd### book..
leftfield 2 years, 10 months ago
He has no point. He is a dolt.
But he's probably a patriot!!
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
"WHOSE SIDE ARE YOU ON???"
This question doesn't get any less stupid through repetition, steve.
mcg2010 2 years, 10 months ago
I think the problem with this article isn't that it addresses something that is a non-issue, but rather only begins to show the tip of the iceberg of what is so infuriating about the current position of the GOP. The use of nazi propaganda in correlation with President Obama is something that is in constant use by the Republicans and tea party activists. They use these images for shock value and then when their choices are called in to question their answer is always "We are just trying to say that Obama is a socialist." Oh really, is that what you were trying to do? I couldn't tell from the billboard image with Obama sandwiched between Hitler and Lenin. Thanks for clarifying. But this is just one of the many ways that Republican hypocrisy is running rampant. When it was President Bush's image with Hitler mustache it was "outrageous" and "completely inappropriate." But when it's Obama, they are just trying to make a point. It's just like the bank bailouts. When it was Bush pushing this policy, republicans supported it. But when Obama came in to office and opted to continue the recovery plan that Bush began, you began to hear the cries of "SOCIALIST" from the republicans. There is little that can be considered pretty about politics. The process of villianizing one's political opponent occurs early on in the political playbook. To me that's not the issue. The issue, and I believe Mr. Rhoades would agree, is not about the sensationalism behind trying to compare the President (Bush Jr. or Obama) to Hitler, but rather hypocrisy. How do the republicans (and in many respects the democrats are guilty of this as well) expect us to put the country back in their hand when they seem to living in a land of negativity and hypocrisy. I would be much ore interested in knowing how the republicans (heck, even the tea party) plan to help our nation, instead of using Photoshop to create negative imagery "to make a point". We need to stop the name calling and the creation of false comparisons and get work done to better our country.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
Connor: Please show me one instance where I have compared George W. Bush to Hitler or called him a Nazi.
Yours is wingnut talk-radio "logic" at its finest. "You called Bush incompetent so you can't complain when people call Obama a fascist." That's just silly.
JER 2 years, 10 months ago
Thank you Ed and mcg2010 for your comments. Well said!!
donbridge 2 years, 10 months ago
In the future everyone will be Hitler for fifteen minutes.
Behan 2 years, 10 months ago
Understandably, the first thoughts that pop to mind when Adolf Hitler's name is mentioned are his maniacal acts of aggression and genocide.
However, one can easily make a reasonable comparison between some of the policies of Adolf Hitler and President Obama. Let us not forget that Adolf Hitler was Time Magazine's "Man of the Year" in 1938--a prestige bestowed upon the leader primarily for his economic policies. He was praised by the media, and largely given a free pass for some of his questionable policies because he represented a model for change and for the reclamation of wealth for purposes of redistribution. (Obviously, his true madness was yet to emerge.) As stated in the Time article:
"Most cruel joke of all, however, has been played by Hitler & Co. on those German capitalists and small businessmen who once backed National Socialism as a means of saving Germany's bourgeois economic structure from radicalism. The Nazi credo that the individual belongs to the state also applies to business. Some businesses have been confiscated outright, on other what amounts to a capital tax has been levied. Profits have been strictly controlled. Some idea of the increasing Governmental control and interference in business could be deduced from the fact that 80% of all building and 50% of all industrial orders in Germany originated last year with the Government. Hard-pressed for food-stuffs as well as funds, the Nazi regime has taken over large estates and in many instances collectivized agriculture, a procedure fundamentally similar to Russian Communism." (Time, 2 January 1939)
Should sound eerily familiar to anyone willing to momentarily remove the patented "Bush's Fault" earmuffs and the official "Change We Can Believe In" sunglasses (with extra rose-colored tinting).
I don't believe it acceptable to suggest President Obama is some type of genocidal or a tyrannical maniac; however, I find it perfectly reasonable to compare many of his (soon to be failed) policies to those of Adolf Hitler. Many similarities exist, as unfomfortable as it may be to draw them.
So, yes, as the column title attempts to sarcastically suggest: "It's OK Now to Call the President Hitler."
P.S. I found the Hitler/Obama/Lenin billboard a bit over the top. It would be unreasonable to draw a strong comparison between President Obama and Vladimir Lenin. Lenin, for instance, extended the professional courtesy of coming through the front door to confiscate the citizens' wealth.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
"In the future everyone will be Hitler for fifteen minutes."
Hah! donbridge For the Win!
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
Behan: And what businesses has President Obama "confiscated"? How have American business' profits been "strictly controlled"?
Behan 2 years, 10 months ago
To avoid listing all 7,330,000 results for the first issue and 3, 310,000 for the second, I will offer you 2 links:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=federal+takeover+of+business
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=obama+federal+control+profits
teufelhunden 2 years, 10 months ago
connor-you hit the nail on the head!!!
teufelhunden 2 years, 10 months ago
Behan for the win!!! HAH HAH! That was just spot on!!!
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
Behan: Oh, I see. You don't know how to answer a question for yourself. Nor, apparently, do you know what "confiscate " means. No surprise that wieselhunden appreciates your lame attempt to duck the question.
Thanks for playing. You lose.
taxed2death: Nice attempt to change the subject, bit what does that have to do with what we're discussing here?
OldSpook 2 years, 10 months ago
Behan, Nice piece, thanks.
Behan 2 years, 10 months ago
Well, Dusty, if you are really having a hard time figuring it our for for yourself, I will try to get you started in the right direction. Think of a teensy little segment of our now-failing economy known as the health care industry.
That should get you started down the right path.
"Thanks for playing. You lose," eh?
Tempting to comment about how childish this remark makes you appear, but I would rather not stoop.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
So taxed2death doesn't understand the word confiscation either. Or what a union is, or what the word "forced' means.
And just saying "health care industry" doesn't answer the question, Behan. It's pretty funny...the actual leftists and socialists in this country were livid over the health care reform bill, which they decried as a gift to the insurance industry.
So tell us: how does a universal mandate for health insurance amount to "confiscation' of the companies or "strict control of profits"? Why did insurance company stocks go UP when the bill was signed?
oh, BTW: after your non-answer at 12:41 PM, you're the LAST person here with a right to talk about being "childish." But thanks again for playing.
Behan 2 years, 10 months ago
Dusty,
May I remind you that not all publicity is good publicity.
When you appear day after day, hour after hour, making childish, nonsensical arguments on the Web site of the only newspaper in a small county, people will eventually catch on that you are largely incapable to hold your own in even a simple debate, even with a simpleton such as myself.
Considering the nature of your business, you may wish to curb such exposure. You know, the old Solomon's Proverbs thing: "Better to remain silent and thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt."
Just a little pointer from your pal, Behan.
--Brendan Behan lives, writes, and gives free advice in Carthage.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
So you still can't answer the question?
teufelhunden 2 years, 10 months ago
Deja vu...all over again...lol
Behan 2 years, 10 months ago
Actually, Dusty, I was in a meeting. About to go to another one.
I'll go into a lengthy explanation later today or tomorrow--it gets so tiresome to drill the obvious into the oblivious, but I suppose that is the price I must pay.
Not that it will matter. If I suggested water is wet, you would demand 25 links verifying this fact and then dispute each one. Then you would close with a remark more easily attributed to a small child with a head injury (you lose, I win, thanks for playing, etc, etc).
You are just a post or two away from calling me a poopy head.
And even though it may seem like I am paying attention, I will spend the entire meeting trying to determine if that is sad or funny.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
"If I suggested water is wet, you would demand 25 links verifying this fact and then dispute each one.."
Well I'd certainly want more than a reference to a condescending "let me Google that for you" site that then leads to a plethora of links to far right wing blogs full of exactly the type of hysterical language-challenged ranting about "confiscation" that you engage in.
Hint: It doesn't bolster your argument to claim something's true just because some other wingnut on Redstate or FreeRepublic was mangling the language and calling things what they are most manifestly not--any more than it would prove anything I said to link to DailyKos or DemocraticUnderground.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
Ah...so all taxation is confiscation, taxed2death?
As for "wingnut", while I know you regard Olbermann and Maddow as the source of all things EEEEEVIL, the word has much wider (and longer) usage:
http://books.google.com/books?id=c4UoX6-Sv1AC&pg=PA435&lpg=PA435&dq=safire+wingnut&source=bl&ots=V0Dn0sszNq&sig=ydvK_Z_g41MQevSrsLOOjbZ_9R8&hl=en&ei=V2g_TM6_IsP6lweomLzDCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
"Like 'moonbat' the term 'wingnut' is an abbreviation of a longer term, in this case 'right wing nut', where 'nut' as slang for the head, has long been used to refer to a person who is silly, stupid, crazy, or simply 'nutty'....the original 'right-wing nut' is of considerable antiquity, dating at least to the 1960s..."
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
From taxed2deths last couple of posts, I strongly suspect that what we're about to see are some lame attempts at what I call the "Humpty Dumpty" argument. You may remember the character of Humpty Dumpty in "Alice in Wonderland" who had this exchange with Alice:
When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone,it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.'The question is,' said Alice,whether you can make words mean so many different things.'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty,which is to be master - - that's all.'Wingnuts try to give words like "confiscation" meanings that they do not actually possess. (They try a similar trick with the world "amnesty").
They don't seem to realize that Humpty is a comic figure.
Watch this space for further developments.....
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
The post where he ducked my question, you mean?
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
taxd2deth: I tend to regard posts like the Behan post you reference as basically meaning "because...because...because SHUT UP, that's why!" In short, posts like that are weak, devoid of actual argument, and essentially just noise from someone who had nothing to say, but who feels like they have to say something. I'm not saying--yet--that Behan is an endurance troll*, but that is one of the warning signs.
*ENDURANCE TROLL: One who regards making the last post in the thread as a victory and thus hangs on, re-posting refuted arguments, refusing to address questions (while falsely insisting that his already answered ones have been ignored), and generally being a pain until everyone gets bored and leaves.
Behan 2 years, 10 months ago
Poor Dusty, you've already lost and you don't even realize it.
Your entire argument was based upon the premise that it was outrageous to make any type of comparison between the two leaders. I made a few observations proving you wrong (which were qute brilliant, by the way, and superbly delivered, I might add).
Others joined in to provide their thoughts on the similarities. You stumbled around for a bit, losing your way. I was braced for a big comeback there it was!
....endurance troll.
I had hoped for a bit more, you with homefield advantage and all. Oh well, game's over I guess. There is nowhere left to go from here. I'll hit the lights on the way out. You can stick around and run the bases on your own if it will help you sleep.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
Behan: that's it? That's your follow up to "I'll go into a lengthy explanation later today or tomorrow"?
"I made a few observations proving you wrong .."
Um, no. You provided a couple of hysterical overstatements about "confiscation" and "strictly limited profits". When asked to back them up, you lazily posted a link to 'let me Google that for you", which led to a bunch of links to wingnut blogs just as full of hysterical overstatements. Pressed further for specifics, you said you'd come up with them later, then posted that lame and evasive "you're here too much" malarkey instead of providing them.
Sorry, you still lose. But thanks for playing.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
Panzer13 (bravely posting anonymously as always): "Dusty you are in the running for the biggest A-hole in Moore County..."
steveital: "PANZER 13 right on....the real goal here should be civil debate,"
And steve really doesn't see the disconnect there. Pitiful. This is why you're a laughingstock, steve.
leftfield 2 years, 10 months ago
You know it's bad when you get a "right on" from steveital.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
leftfield: It's like when McCain got endorsed by Shooter Cheney. He was toast by then anyway, but that couldn't have helped....
Behan 2 years, 10 months ago
Dusty,
I could spend a couple of hours developing an elaborate argument proving my point, complete with footnotes and "legitimate" references, but you would only whine that it was too long, say something negative about Bush, or change the topic.
Simply put, my time is worth more than yours. Arguing online with lawyers is not really my idea of a pleasant evening. I don't even like lawyers in person--always feel like I need a shower after being too close. I digress.
I provided simple, to-the-point, legitimate discussions and retorts. You ramble on for pages and spend the entire day coming up with semi-questionable references to support your bizarre reality.
I just don't have the time or the energy, so you win this one.
Obama is not Hitler. Congrats.
Behan
--Brendan Behan lives writes, and rolls his eyes at the schoolyard absurdity of it all in Carthage.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
"schoolyard absurdity"
"Crustyloads."
Heh.
leftfield 2 years, 10 months ago
""Crustyloads, now I can actually say I LOL'd on that one. I have to agree Behan is on his game.""
This coming from Taxed2deth, a man who is too ignorant to realize his taxes were lowered last year. Unless, of course, he is talking about his weekly visit to the tanning bed or his pack a day habit....
TheNeedle 2 years, 10 months ago
I see the usual elevated level of discourse continues to prevail here at the Pilot.
bs_master 2 years, 10 months ago
I dont call him hitler, I call him Iraqi O'bomber
blake 2 years, 10 months ago
@Ed, You can call scream and call yourself a Libertarian all you want but in the above posts you asked the FCC to defy the First Amendment, you asked for increased government regulation, you espouse a huge entitlement sociey, you asked for wealth redistribution/ building the economy from the bottom up. I would let yourself claim to be a Republican in the likes of McCain, Graham, or Specter which have driven much of the Tea Party out of the Republican party. I would let yourself call yourself a Liberal(maybe that is what you meant to type). You espouse more socialist and even communist rants above than Libertarian. Sorry, you can call yourself whatever but you would be just as accurate calling yourself a firetruck.
Ross 2 years, 10 months ago
Behan - Your AC bill must be mammoth with all that hot air!
teufelhunden 2 years, 10 months ago
Enormous egos abound...
teufelhunden 2 years, 10 months ago
A bunch of pedantic quibble...
recondo 2 years, 10 months ago
All great movements are popular movements. They are the volcanic eruptions of human passions and emotions, stirred into activity by the ruthless Goddess of Distress or by the torch of the spoken word cast into the midst of the people. Adolf Hitler Hummm now why does this quote from Hitler seem like something i have seen before.... From both Parties
teufelhunden 2 years, 10 months ago
recondo-there's definitely some truth to that!
blake 2 years, 10 months ago
Ed, Unless talk radio is full of cussing or inciting violence what rules are you asking the FCC to enforce? Just because you disagree with speech doesn't mean it should be suppressed. We are living in an ever growing entitlement society. That includes Medicare and Social Security. They are bankrupting the nation and need to be curtailed. The present administration is expanding entitlements and making more dependence on government. I will agree with you on voting out encumbents. The only reason I am a registered republican and not an independent was because I really hoped to get Coble out of office during the primary. I agree with your anti-incumbant stance but admit I will now support Coble because I do not believe we can afford any more democrats in office. I would love a strong libertarian candidate but fear they do not stand a chance in a third party.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
leftfield put it best:
You know it's bad when you get a "right on" from steveital.
leftfield 2 years, 10 months ago
steveital wrote ""DUSTY Behan kicked your tail, no I was square on, if I'm crazy u r right behind me...don't you have any clients?""
Do you proofread any of your sh$$?....That was borderline incomprehensible.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
Borderline?
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
WTF are you lying about now, steve?
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
God, I hope Palin runs. I really do. Somebody somewhere will say something that she deems mildly insulting to one of her kids, and the tantrum she throws on-air will make Stevital look like a statesman. Her inevitable meltdown will remind people why McCain got stomped so severely, by a black guy whose middle name is Hussein, no less: because he put that prima donna a shaky heartbeat away from the Oval Office.
And jimt: expecting stevital to actually provide back up for one of his hysterical screeds is like expecting him to sprout wings and fly, or expecting one of these sniveling cowards to have the stones to say some of their "clever" insults using their real names. Each is about as likely.
TheNeedle 2 years, 10 months ago
steveital isn't a Nazi. They killed the mentally defective.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
That one even made ME wince.
KarenH 2 years, 10 months ago
Behan-You are one smart cookie-I love it!
RmeMP 2 years, 10 months ago
DUSTYRHOADES said:
"expecting stevital to actually provide back up for one of his hysterical screeds is like expecting him to sprout wings and fly, or expecting one of these sniveling cowards to have the stones to say some of their "clever" insults using their real names."
wow, more attacks by dusty - why am i not surprised? what i am surprised about, is all the free passes the pilot gives him for breaking the site agreement about posting... no, wait, i guess im not - SINCE HE IS PAID BY THEM!
leftfield 2 years, 10 months ago
RmeMP, this is getting old. Is everyone of your post going to involve DR from now on? Get over it and yourself..
bobbylaton 2 years, 10 months ago
I try not to read articles by Ducky Woades because of his extreme hatred for former President George W. Bush. I don't think I have ever seen an article of his that he did not try to make fun of President Bush's name by writing Dubbya as his middle name. People should expect higher standards from writers of the columns of the newspapers, especially from someone who professes to be an attorney (but then again). I can't understand why the editor of the Pilot continues to print Ducky's columns as he always trys to belittle President George W. Bush. Maybe it appeals to the Fu--y Left Wingers..
maillady54 2 years, 10 months ago
Or mayhap, you should stay a democrat Dusty, and call everyone, infidels?
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
Bobbylaton: "Dubya" was the name George W. Bush was commonly known by among his own family and friends in Texas.
It could be worse. I could have used his other nickname-- "Shrub."
And as always, the ones who complain the loudest about something are the worst offenders, and thus the most blatant hypocrites.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
maillady: I have never actually registered as a Democrat. Just as most of the virulent Obama haters and Bush/Cheney apologists here claim they're not really Republicans but are instead Independents.
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
"RmeMP, this is getting old. Is everyone of your post going to involve DR from now on?"
I think he just asked me out on a date.
RmeMP 2 years, 10 months ago
@dusty,
i assure you that did not ask you out on a date in the sense that you would like it to be - sorry i'm not homosexual, as you would like (i'm assuming).
what i asked you is if you are so curious about who i am and continue to berate me for choosing to remain "anonymous" on a public board, then come meet me. i'll be at o'donnells tonight - i'll probably get there around 9pm, and stay until last call, feel free to drop by and we can meet, then you can stop wondering who i am. how about it?
dustyrhoades 2 years, 10 months ago
Actually I already have plans. But thank you.
And you know where my office is, if you'd like to drop by and chat.
bs_master 2 years, 10 months ago
I will never vote for sarah palin, she comes across as dizzy and has programmed responses to every question. She is a celebrity just like Obama. Neither will I vote for Obama again(man do I feel stupid for that mistake and I apologize to all americans). Is their any person in America that has some sense of economic responsibility, does not sleep with lawyers, an accomplished businessman or woman, wants to secure our borders, wants to make americans that dont want to work work again or cut public assistance, support our military without question, or sane? If i dont see anyone at least similar to the above described person I may, for the first time in a long time, not even vote in 2012! We are basically leaderless right now, sinking into a hole of bankruptcy and all we get from Obama is bills most americans dont support. God help us!!!